@Werner: I just asked myself that question too ;-)

@ChristianHupfer The history reveals a pattern across multiple review queues.

@Werner: The pattern is in most cases opposite to voters in almost any case. I noticed many times already

@Werner: You asked him two days ago (or yesterday?), in a similar case -- did you get any reply?

@ChristianHupfer No, but that's to be expected. Chat accounts are different from regular accounts and my ping is not strong enough... :)

StackExchange got rid of the 10K flag queue and there's been activity around the usefulness of the review queues as well...

...such activity definitely points toward (what I call) robo-reviewing, where users are more interested in the badges associated with the activity rather than the activity itself...

...and the return on investment does not benefit the community, but only the user.

For example, see The current review system encourages fake reviews; some people upvote everything rather than actually fixing problems.

@Werner: I am still reading ;-)

@ChristianHupfer Yes. :)

The thing is that we don't have review audits on TeX - LaTeX.

@Werner: If I understand the first post (on the 10K flag) correctly, it was more difficult earlier on the 10k+ level to vote for delete etc?

However, review audits are also not really fool-proof, but still; it's a way to make people a little less incentive-driven.

@Werner:Are there such audits on other SX sites?

@ChristianHupfer I think there was just a lot of duplication where 10K users were doing the job that could also be done by others...

...I didn't the post again (sorry). :)

@ChristianHupfer Yes, Stack Overflow has review audits.

@Werner: I agree on that fake reviews post and on silly upvoting of (stupid, sorry) questions

With a review audits, you occasionally receive a review that would test whether you're actually doing your job. For example, it could be a deleted post that is pushed into the "First post" queue and if you upvote it, it's obviously wrong.

@Werner: I see... well, of course, human beings are errant sometimes, perhaps clicking too fast, but if there is a pattern ;-)

@ChristianHupfer Yes, and review audits are failed, which is okay. But failing multiple ones result in a review-ban for a number of days (I think).

@Werner: Review - ban ;-) Ok, although I have an SO account, I am far away of doing reviews there, so I am not endangered by a review-ban.

@ChristianHupfer :)

Anyone here a star with tikz? I can't control the colour of the scatter points from a table. :-(

@Werner: In rare cases, I wished, I could retract my review vote, regardless what the precise decision was in that moment, say, if a question is in the close review, I have sometimes voted to leave open and the post turned bad, due to various reasons. But I know, a retracting vote possibility would confuse the whole system even more ...

@ChristianHupfer Yes, that's also happened to me. Some actions can be reversed after casting the in the review queue, but this is really few and far between if your diligent with your regular review tactics.

@Werner: Yes, it could be done if one casts the initial close vote, I know, but in true close review queue, the vote is fixed, unfortunately

@ChristianHupfer True.

@1010011010 Sorry, my tikz-badge doesn't really portray my proficiency in that medium...

@Werner You're such a let down! :-D

@1010011010 I know!

@Werner: In my opinion, a user should not also not be pushed into the close review queue if there is a answer of him to the post under review, this provokes some kind of a 'conflict'

@1010011010: Unfortunately, I know nothing of tikz, I always say to myself: It's time to look into tikz , but I have not started yet ;-)

Bye for now, I have to go to bed ;-)

@1010011010 I may be able to help... :-)

@PaulGessler Sweet~! Right, so I got this fancy looking little graph here. I've fit a curve based on some set of points. The data set is of course visualized using the table option. Here's an excerpt of that part of the tikzpicture:

\addplot[color=green,scatter, scatter src=\thisrow{class}, only marks]
      table[x=x,y=y] {
    x          		 y               class
    100			-160		1
    200			-35		1
    300   		-4.2       	1
    400 		9       		1
    500 		16.9       	1
    600  		21.3		1
};

Works great! Minus one detail. I want to change the colour of the marks.

Documentation in the pgfmanual (v3.0.0) is very very minimal (don't even see scatter mentioned anywhere).

Been fiddling around a little with that \thisrow{class} (that's where the color set is coming from, right?). No dice, though. I can't declare my own colour for it, unfortunately.