@NickStauner I'm very sorry you're unhappy with the rules and expectations here. I really would like to get your question into a place where you can get some useful answers, but you seem disinclined to even consider compromising between the community expectations and your personal expectations.
The question, as-is, is very broad. When we close a question, we are really putting it on hold, with the hopes that it can be improved to the point where it fits our format appropriately.
Thus, if the question gets closed, it is not, as you put it, us who are "dismissing" your question. We're merely trying to get it into a format where we, as the community, feel it will receive the most favorable attention.
Your question, even with your improvements (and I do appreciate that you made the effort to edit the question), still contains a fair amount of tangential points, secondary issues that further expand the possible scope (regardless of the disclaimers), and doesn't really express the fundamental problem you want to "solve". At its heart, the best I can make is that you want a list of possible reasons why this situation could exist
As has been mentioned repeatedly, there are some interesting, and very relevant concepts in there. But the question would benefit from some significant refinement. This isn't a criticism of you, or an attack; just a statement of what the experiences we've had here have shown regarding what does or does not work well in a question.
Regarding the comments about cogsci.se:
I have had some limited interactions with that site. I hold it in very high regard.
However, the level of detail that is incorporated into many answers there, or even some questions, far exceeds all but the most exceptional that I've seen on most other SE sites (granted, most of my exposure is to what are generally referred to as the more "subjective" sites).
I don't perceive this as a negative; quite the opposite, in fact. But the differences do seem to be there, and it can seem odd to those used to the culture more commonly found at many other SE sites.