@BeastOfCaerbannog I am too close to 3k, in a day or two, I'll be one of the most active reviewers :D
@mickmackusa Hmmm... Yes, from the answer given by the author, we can say that the question is related to Windows. In my humble opinion, the question is really silly. Anyway, it's an off–topic question, flagged.
@Someone Well, there are more users that do an awesome job reviewing and editing. I just mentioned the ones that were in this room and I could tag them.
@Someone Hmmm... Yes. I tried to edit it, but nope. It should be deleted, though not for the reason the comment says:
While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review — Davidyesterday
The "link" is a not embedded screenshot, which also shows the wrong menu.
@BeastOfCaerbannog I reviewed this as "Looks OK", but since I found that it needed a lot of work to salvage it and it wouldn't add anything new to the existing answers, I flagged it as NAA.
@Zanna How do the AU mods feel about overriding a community close-vote when it does appear to be "wrong"? It seems to me from the Catija post that the other sites' mods did manually handle some Reopens when warranted (at least during the experiment window). In most cases, it meant a reduction in Mod-closures, but probably an uptick in Mod-reopens.
That said, I know some mods (on some sites, at least) are reluctant to override a community decision, and I think they would need to be a little more open to that if we decreased the close-vote count.
Also, if the AU mods agree that we want to try it, I believe (a) someone needs to just create an answer on the old question and (b) Mods need to agree and then tag it status-review for the Staff to see, right?
After reading terdon's comments, I'm actually a bit afraid of too many WSL posts being wrongly closed as well. You know I've worked hard to educate folks that WSL is often on-topic, but there still seems to be a bit of a negative reaction to some WSL questions, just because they (to use your great description), "smell too Windowsy."
Additional discussion is, of course, always welcome.
Oh, and another general comment -- I found my data was wrong. Successfully CVR exit percentages were even worse than I thought because many of those that did "Complete" were actually Audits, not "real" CVRs.
It turns out to be a lot more difficult to filter out audits from real CVRs.
