@Kulfy Sure, but if that was the case, according to the problem (if I understand it correctly) one of two things should happen: 1. excluding the first line, there should be output after every triplet of lines, or 2. the output should be at the end.
Not necessarily. The input might be getting processed in milliseconds. If the OP copy pasted the whole input at once, the resultant "visual" can't be interpreted. If they type the test cases one by one, the first case was the possible outcome.
Yeah, I have upvoted it. We'll see what the OP will say. Also, I have voted to close it as OT. If the OP's response shows that it isn't, please ping me so I can retract my vote.
@jokerdino When a user reports a post to Natty using @Natty report ..., it automatically registers as a true positive. As you can see in Sentinel, the post has received both your's and Kulfy's feedback.
So you don't have to give feedback again, although it doesn't hurt if you do.
But the feed is automatic? Because I cannot see an option to have the posts sorted, e.g. by date, and what I can currently see are over 2 year old posts only.
Oh. I'm not sure if there is deliberately a delay or if there is a bug that is causing this.
I think the Sentinel review queue drops an item from the queue once it receives feedback from even one user. But I believe (going by the number of replies to Natty in this room) that there are quite a few newer posts that haven't received feedback. So I don't know.
Another approach to "reviewing," which is good for more recent messages, is to go upward in the chat and look at each message from Natty. I've found this to be good not just for very recent messages but for messages up to weeks or even months ago. You can keep clicking "Load older messages". :)
You can also look at Natty's messages here at chat.stackexchange.com/… though it's not very convenient since replies are in a new tab. Most of what it reports here it also reports in chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/54445/sebotics where there is less other talk, but some reports only manage to get here because of rate-limiting (it was the other way around, with some reports only going there, until Bhargav Rao changed which room it posts to first).
Maybe it would be more efficient to just click the Sentinel link, and not the post link.
This would pass up the opportunity to vote and flag on posts where those actions make sense, but if most of the posts in the backlog don't need such on-site interactions, I think that could be a worthwhile tradeoff.
Yes, and if you're only giving feedback, it's about the version of the post that Natty saw and that Sentinel has anyway, whether or not it was then edited in a way that changed whether or not it's NAA on the site.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted username, potentially bad asn for hostname in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (94): select and PS2 variable by Wesley Atwood call me this way on askubuntu.com
