« first day (2610 days earlier)      last day (111 days later) » 

1:23 AM
@Kulfy I don't know if it's better to edit the existing answers or post a new answer there.
@Natty tp
@Natty ne
(Though I guess it might be considered just fp.)
Btw, I approved that edit but it needs at least one more review.
This question seems like an example of a question where it is reasonable for 20k users to delete (long) before 48 hours have passed.
 
 
2 hours later…
@Natty tp
I think all the comments here from the third one down, or perhaps all of them, are no longer needed.
There are many no-longer-needed comments about accepting answers, and those comments are examples of that, but also worse than usual (from both sides). I can imagine myself in either of the commenters positions and while I can't speak for anybody I'd personally love to have a comment conversation like that deleted especially if I'd participated in it.
If you're not sure what I mean, take a look at the last parts of this comment and that reply. I assume it's from one or both of those that another user ended up posting this unfortunate thing.
The main reason to flag the comments is that they're irrelevant to the interest of anybody reading the post and have no value. I'm mentioning my reasoning because, for some reason, the whole thing seems to have been looked at by high rep users before, but the comments are still there.
I don't mean to make a big deal of it. I just noticed it when I was flagging the recent NAA post.
 
@EliahKagan flagged them all
 
Should the first two, by the OP, be removed as well? I didn't flag those.
 
4:05 AM
they seemed obsolete to me but maybe there is something to be said about that topic?
 
Yeah, you're right.
The second one kinda cancels the first one out. :)
 
yeah haha
 
 
2 hours later…
5:55 AM
This is a partial answer, not something, I think, we should be deleting as NAA
 
 
1 hour later…
7:10 AM
not an appropriate edit suggestion imho I rejected as attempt to reply
@EliahKagan I actually think this is an answer of sorts so my edit to it is pretty superficial. Do you think it helped, or is further/different editing needed, or should the post still be deleted?
 
7:27 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +10 more (1188): nutraslimdiet.com/sera-relief-cbd-oil/ by user986507 on askubuntu.com
 
@Natty tp
 
@Natty tp
and I guess that means the question it's posted on is a dupe as well ^ (as suggested by @karel)
should this question be closed as a dupe of one of the posts we have about fixing the error /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by UID 0 and have the setuid bit set or should we be voting unclear and/or asking for further details?
 
I converted that non-answer into a comment, so that reviewers will know that the OP accepted it as a duplicate question.
 
thanks :)
your version of the comment is even more exclamatory than the original :)
I review a mere handful of First Posts and get two audits in the bunch O.o
 
8:03 AM
unclear (I think?)
looks at the First Posts review history page and sighs heavily at all the No Action Needed reviews
 
8:20 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, +2 more (491): Your body will get in a perfect shape by williefarmer on askubuntu.com
 
this NAA-looking post seems to be a reply to that comment with some extra info on what worked. Can it be edited to be more useful?
or should something else be done?
@Natty hmm
not sure what to do
 
8:54 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, +5 more (689): Lean Boost Keto is Pumpkin like natural product by swandonle on askubuntu.com
 
9:13 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +3 more (397): confidentpedia.com/velofel-south-africa/ by JohnyQuiry on askubuntu.com
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer, potentially bad ip for hostname in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer (94): Battery information is wrong by SHUBHAM Gupta on askubuntu.com
 
10:04 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, blacklisted website in body, link inside deeply nested blockquotes, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad ns for domain in title, +2 more (299): confidentpedia.com/velofel-south-africa/ by JohnGlase on askubuntu.com
 
10:59 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, +1 more (393): interactive prompt internal error by Ulfatbos64 on askubuntu.com
 
11:43 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, +7 more (790): health2wealthclub.com/ultra-fast-keto-boost/ by dugaon on askubuntu.com
 
@Zanna Seems fine now.
 
ok :)
 
@Natty fp
@Natty I don't know if that's intended as an answer or not.
@EliahKagan Why did that feedback have no effect?
In Sentinel it's not shown.
 
12:05 PM
I'll try again...
@Natty fp
Nothing.
 
^^ A manufacturer's official website is a blogspot blog?
 
dubious
 
It's not. I found their actual website. Also, the linked blog post only claims to have Windows and Mac drivers.
@Natty tp
Yeah, that didn't do anything either. Is Sentinel down?
 
maybe
 
12:15 PM
They replied to my comment seeming to agree that the link is not to where they said it is to, but saying they're not a spammer and just found it through Google. I don't know why they don't delete the post, then, but maybe they don't know how. Or maybe they are a spammer (though they have a bit of other SE activity) or it's a hacked account.
I think it's reasonable to vote to delete the post rather than wait for it to be deleted by spam flags... also, this might be a situation where the VLQ flag is actually appropriate (if you're not comfortable flagging as spam).
The "official website" part is enough for me not to retract my spam flag, at least for how. But I've also voted to delete it, which is sort of a way of giving the post author the benefit of the doubt. Sort of.
 
I voted to delete it too
 
@EliahKagan Or may be a comment. "Related: What is hwe?"
 
@Zanna Sentinel doesn't show your recent feedback either.
 
:(
 
Assuming the problem is that Sentinel is not fully working, the feedback can just be given when it works again. I've had feedback not do anything, though never for this long a time. The feedback is in the chat log so little is lost.
 
12:30 PM
yeah
 
When metasmoke is unable to receive feedback, is Sentinel usually also unable to receive feedback?
 
12:47 PM
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +5 more (692): www.herbalsupplementreview.com/nutrigen-dietary-forskolin/ by kamchujagupri on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer, pattern-matching website in answer (139): What is kthrotld? by user986601 on askubuntu.com
 
That one took! :) Never mind, no it didn't, I misread. Sentinel is still not receiving feedback.
I feel like we must already have a fan speed question that this one might be a duplicate of.
 
I thought so too but didn't look
 
12:54 PM
So anyway, as seen above, Natty doesn't respond to manual reports either. I think something's down with the infrastructure. If it persists we should probably say something.
 
 
2 hours later…
2:57 PM
@EliahKagan did it!
 
Does that really need to be CW?
Oh, there's a conversation about this in AUGR.
Thanks for posting the Q&A, btw!
 
:)
it probably needs work
which I can be lazy about since it's a CW XD
 
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
^^ It's just a quote of that whole answer and a statement that it worked.
This Natty feedback will, I assume, have to be redone latter. But we can delete the NAA posts sooner.
 
 
1 hour later…
4:44 PM
@EliahKagan It seems neither Natty nor Sentinel is down. For example, this received feedback 2 hours ago.
It seems Natty is angry with AU.
 
Interesting.
 
I just checked the GitHub. I thought may be Bhargav saw those buggy messages and committed something. But last commit was on Mar 7.
 
I didn't read Raffa's answer thoroughly. Does it really address all concerns? It already got 12 upvotes (may be because of HNQ madness).
 
4:59 PM
I mean the answerer tried to cover all the concerns, but most of them are generic suggestions and tips on good practices. In their defence that's the most one can do as the question has almost no technical details.
 
Makes sense. Closed.
 
5:47 PM
Good edit, sudo really is needed there and it was used in the preceding commands (which are not chroot commands or anything) so it appears intended.
I clicked Skip on this edit.
 
@EliahKagan I think that's no improvement. I rejected.
 
Okay.
 
6:28 PM
@Natty tp
Natty ain't working properly for AU
 
The problem seems to be that it's not responding to messages from this room.
 
Yeah just saw.
 
7:21 PM
@Natty alive
 
 
3 hours later…
10:14 PM
 
11:10 PM
@Natty hi
 
11:38 PM
Do we have something for this?
@EliahKagan May be Natty needs to be rebooted by a mod like Bindoz. May be dropping a message on sebotics help.
 
@Kulfy Maybe. But I recommend you go ahead and post your answer (the solution you commented about that worked) unless you find it really soon.
@Kulfy Bindoz isn't currently pingable in SEBotics, I don't think. Is that room checked regularly? Or would it be better to post in SOBotics?
Or we could invite Bhargav Rao and mention both this and the linking bug you found earlier.
 
Or on GitHub?
Some mod was active about an hour ago.
The mod should be SO mod or any mod?
 
Is it referring to diamond moderators?
If so, then my guess is that any mod could do it, because they're all mods on chat, which is probably what Natty checks.
Or by mod does it mean people from a list of users who are allowed to control Natty?
 

« first day (2610 days earlier)      last day (111 days later) »