« first day (2123 days earlier)      last day (2191 days later) » 

12:25 AM
Is this clear at all?
 
 
1 hour later…
 
1 hour later…
 
2 hours later…
5:58 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad pattern in URL body, blacklisted website in body, +4 more: Rapid Trim Ultra Forskoilin Review by raookinatra on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body: keto tone diet new soe new by vfsdvdsds on askubuntu.com
 
6:20 AM
@pomsky voted to close as unclear
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty fp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
love the smell of delete votes in the morning o.O
 
6:41 AM
First blood
 
 
1 hour later…
7:48 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +6 more: foreverhealthy786.com/healthy-king-keto-burn/ by bess on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +6 more: foreverhealthy786.com/healthy-king-keto-burn/ by McColl Sean on askubuntu.com
 
 
2 hours later…
9:35 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, +1 more: Bold Mass Although many exercises will by beetasara on askubuntu.com
 
11:18 AM
@Natty tp
 
 
1 hour later…
 
1 hour later…
@Zanna someone pressed upvote button probably
@pomsky closed
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
 
3:07 PM
@jokerdino it could be so
 
3:27 PM
@Natty tp
 
5:49 PM
@Natty tp
 
 
2 hours later…
8:17 PM
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
 
@Zanna If somehow that's off-topic, then the reason is neither apparent nor related to it being of interest to developers. (We list "Development on Ubuntu" explicitly as one of the topics that people can ask about in the help center, after all.)
 
I could not see anything off-topic about it. But I don't think I understand the question, alas (not at all the question's fault)
I don't have a clue how to answer this question but it looks to me like somebody would be able to figure it out... if it's unclear, what's missing?
 
8:40 PM
It seems fine to me. Nobody's requested clarification. David Foerster didn't seem to have a problem interpreting the question when he answered it.
Are non-recent editors pingable? I think the answer is yes but I'm not sure...
 
If only the system would tab-complete editors to let us know we can ping them, we would be able to tell if there was a time limit
well, the review is complete now, thanks! :)
 
I think the reason it doesn't is that it's the client-side JavaScript that does (or does not do) tab completion, and the information about all the editors is not provided in any form. Of course this could be remedied by including it, or fetching it when a user comments, or fetching it when a user starts an @ reply while commenting.
No problem.
 
ah... could be fixed then
I think that question is ok
 
8:57 PM
I agree. It's of direct relevance to Ubuntu users in a way that it is relevant to basically nobody else, and also we explicitly allow questions about "Services provided by Ubuntu." I don't exactly know what that means anymore, and I'm not sure I ever did, but I can't think of any interpretation at all that would exclude questions about where to find files that are provided officially on the Internet for use on Ubuntu systems.
Most of the close votes are for the EoL reason. I wonder if people didn't understand the question, or were unfamiliar with the technical issues involved?
I think a userscript could accomplish it, too, but if the system changed who gets pinged, the userscript would be far, far worse than useless. If the system changes who gets pinged but @ autocompletion is not updated, then that would be even worse... but SE devs would be able to make both changes at the same time, and if they didn't then there would be heavy practical testing resulting in a bug report and fix, probably in a short time unless only uncommon use cases were affected.
 
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
 
9:31 PM
seems answerable possibly by the commenters...
 
I've asked that the second commenter, who does not believe it is a bug (and who I think is right), if they'll post an answer.
 
thanks!
@Natty that could be the answer
 
9:56 PM
@Natty fp
 
 
2 hours later…
11:49 PM
OT (mac OS X)
 

« first day (2123 days earlier)      last day (2191 days later) »