« first day (3382 days earlier)      last day (1164 days later) » 

03:39
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in body (1): Getting "Apache2 Ubuntu Default Page" and I'm not a webserver by motschmania on askubuntu.com
 
4 hours later…
 
3 hours later…
09:50
@Zanna I think so too. It regards a very specific case (using Solaar).
thanks for the input
@Natty tp
@Natty fp
 
1 hour later…
@Zanna I added a custom reason for rejecting the edit, but I wrote "question" instead of "answer". :/
11:50
I also rejected it and hopefully wrote something expressing what I meant haha
anyway nobody reads those messages XD
 
3 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
15:46
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in title (1): What are the benefits of taking online tuition? by Priyanshu Rawat on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in answer, link at end of answer, blacklisted user (226): What are the benefits of taking online tuition? by Abhay Bhatt on askubuntu.com
 
1 hour later…
 
1 hour later…
18:31
Another edit that should have been an answer. I rejected it with a custom reason, but the other reviewer rejected it as "Attempt to reply". After my conversation with terdon here and here I understand that "Attempt to reply" is not the correct reason for rejecting such edits.
I suppose that most reviewers understand "Attempt to reply" as I did ("an attempt to reply to the question's OP through an edit of the answer"). Should I (or maybe a mod) make a meta post about it?
It seems that even mods are confused about it, judging by the review of this edit.
@BeastOfCaerbannog Perhaps not most, but many. I saw more edits rejected as "Attempt to reply" the last few days, and this is what I usually see on reviews of similar edits.
19:07
hmmmm
 
1 hour later…
20:07
Should this edit be accepted, considering that the edited answer is probably NAA?

« first day (3382 days earlier)      last day (1164 days later) »