« first day (418 days earlier)      last day (2146 days later) » 
04:00 - 13:0013:00 - 19:00

S S
4:46 AM
@TheDestroyer Why did you miss out low quality posts? :D
 
@SS Pushkara's Leela. What can i do? :P
 
 
1 hour later…
5:58 AM
@TheDestroyer - HAHA but what's my LEELA , all is his :) शुभ दिनं - वेदान्त & फिलोसोफि 🙏🏻
 
@SwiftPushkar haha. वन्दनं अभिवन्दनम्
 
@TheDestroyer - नमस्कारं , प्रणामं , नमस्कृत्यं , :)
 
6:20 AM
@RakeshJoshi There?
 
@KrishnShweta i visit this room less...
 
I know :P
 
So... I was reading this post again... plus your arguments ^^
https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17616/were-women-cursed-with-menstruation
Seems you are against to those answers.
 
yes these answers are not true... the concept of menstruation is not a result or curse or sin but its something auspicious .
 
6:26 AM
Can you tell me more about this? If you don't mind?
 
yes
as per the story indra did some sin and women accepted some part of that sin and which started as menses in them...

but then the question is, the women before that incident did not menstruate or what?
its not possible

without menses one does not attain puberty and cannot have capacity to conceive.
apart from human other animals like some monkeys , bats etc also menstruate.. then whose sin did they take up ?
 
Then why women are not allowed in temples during that?
 
it is a natural phenomenon
because of male dominated society ...
 
Oh!! Shakta perspective?
 
in tantric poojas there is no such restriction .. in fact they prefer woman guru over male guru .

in tantric literature menses is celebrated and the menses substance is referred as "pushpa" or "flower" and women who is having menses is called "pushpini"
in assam there is kamakhya temple where the goddess is beleived to menstruate every year for 3 days ...
this june month itself.
every year a big fair is held there during this period for 10 days
temple remains closed for three days
they say that red fluid comes out from the main sanctum sanctorum

festival is called "ambubachi"
 
6:34 AM
Oh!! When a girl attain puberty, people celebrate.
Yeah, I read about this temple.
 
S S
Kamakhya temple is one of the shakti peethas.
It is believed that a part of Sati devi fell at this place too.
 
@SS Yeah. I read it's the lower body part of Sati.
 
now also in some south indian and east indian states when a girl gets her first period then it is celebrated in a grand manner.
it is called mangala snaanam
yoni portion of sati has believed to feel there... hence there is no idol and just a yoni shaped rock.
its a mysterious temple and that place neelachal parvat is associated with many legends
 
@RakeshJoshi Yes. People celebrate it grandly.
But few don't :P
But people call it impure and untouchable :(
 
one has to accept the fact that women has been given special previlege of being able to conceive ..
male chauvinist people have made shasras in a diferent way with anti women stuff
if it was something bad then how can the first period be celebrated in a grand manner ?
 
6:41 AM
And women are suffering :(
 
in fact if someone does not get period then its bad ... its a medical condition called amenorrhoea
 
@RakeshJoshi Hmm... But during that celebration, people shut the doors of their pooja room
 
that all later thing
its that natural arrangement of body is that there is extra blood produced everymonth which can be used for the development of fetus ..
that is why after pregnancy menses stops .. because that blood is used for foetus development
 
Yes....
 
i think in vedas also there is no such direct statements like its inauspicious etc
 
6:46 AM
Oh!!
One personal question :P
 
some grhya sutras say to follow vrata for 3 days thats all .

vrata means austerity

means has to follow moderation in food etc and avoid intercourse.
 
@RakeshJoshi If you have a girl child then will you allow her in poojas/temples during that? (Sorry)
 
why not if she is willing then nothing wrong
even now also mental pooja and mental chanting etc is allowed right ?
?? i did not see
nothing wrong
we dont know what was case in the past but now i think there are modern sanitary pads then i dont think that menses blood can make a temple impure. so in temple also it wont be a problem .
 
@KrishnShweta - I also think , It does't matter :)
 
6:52 AM
@SwiftPushkar in your answers you have heavily criticized menses though ! :)
 
@RakeshJoshi - where its criticizing ?
 
then is it praising ?
its declared sinful then what more criticism wanted
 
@RakeshJoshi - I don't know ,but i couldn't locate the precise criticizing content :)
 
means something related to sin is good as per you ?
 
@RakeshJoshi - Sharing a sin is not bad :)
 
6:57 AM
so u believe that religious restrictions are wrong on it ?
 
@RakeshJoshi Actually I thought to ask you this before only. But I didn't..
 
why
i will try to make a post on this topic ..
 
@RakeshJoshi - With today's advancements and with better hygiene products , the restrictions are not that applicable but has to be followed in temples etc. but in case of performing poojas at home or reading its ok
 
@RakeshJoshi Ok....
 
@SwiftPushkar but now also untouchability etc is there. but its good that u think that home worship can be done.
 
7:02 AM
@RakeshJoshi - yeah , we have change /adopt ourselves (also spiritually ) according to time :)
 
@TheDestroyer
ojas is root dhatu as per Ayurveda . so its there both for men and women.
 
@RakeshJoshi I remember you said that you don't subscribe to puranas. Is this the reason?
 
@SwiftPushkar You are not habituated to Rakesh well. You will soon. :P
 
many reasons ...
 
@RakeshJoshi But how do you explain for females through semen?
 
7:13 AM
But nothing wrong with Men dominating society until there is no injustice to women.
 
means
 
@TheDestroyer - haha , he will change , already started to see 😀
 
In fact, a society should be men dominated only.
 
@Aghori Why?
 
@Aghori by your saying nothing will happen .. just witness the rise of women ... its just the beginning.
 
7:18 AM
@RakeshJoshi Women or men. They are Humans and they are deluded by Maya. Equality should be there. But we shouldn't also misinterpret some verses as male domination. Also, there should be no fake feminism.
 
can u see ojas on face of ma anandamayi ?
@TheDestroyer
 
@RakeshJoshi Explain conceptually?
 
@KrishnShweta Women are source of creation. They must be loving, caring, soft. Womanhood & motherhood are synonymous. Such warmth of women rises a perfect dharmic life/offspring. Women are not supposed to behave like Men as men are not supposed to behave like women. Both genders have their own significance, no gender is above than other. It is just that both have different areas & scopes. @RakeshJoshi
 
@TheDestroyer which verse i have misinterpret ?
 
7:20 AM
@RakeshJoshi Swatantra verse of Manu Smriti and some other verses.
 
when u say both are equal then why you snatch independance from one ?@TheDestroyer
 
@RakeshJoshi That's not independence. Do you think if your mother restricts you from going somewhere as snatching independence or protection? There should be tradeoff.
 
@RakeshJoshi Rise of uncontrolled feminism will give rise to uncontrolled Meninism. Once Meninism comes situation would be again like before. Balance os nectar, imbalance is venom.
 
@Aghori be honest and talk your heart out .. yesterday you were saying against sexual empowerment now ur saying women should not imitate men.. what exactly is the issue ??
@TheDestroyer have u read complete verse ? if not then read it then comment.
 
7:22 AM
@Aghori When the time comes for women to fight like men then she will.
 
@RakeshJoshi Everything should be in equal proportions.
 
I'm saying neither Women should copy men, nor men should copy women. Its simple. Both are different creation & not competitors.
we have misunderstood the word “equal”. Equal does not mean same. Equal means equal opportunity, equal regard, equal respect, but not sameness of action. If you bring sameness of activity, you will put the woman to great disadvantage in most areas of life outside. You will put men to disadvantage in certain other areas of life. And above all, inefficiency will prevail – women trying to do what men are good at, men trying to do what women are good at and making a mess of it.
 
@Aghori good one.
 
now jaggi will decide which are men oriented and which are women oriened work s?
 
@KrishnShweta Harmony never prevails by satisfying egos, it prevails by mutual respect, coordination & Swadharma.
 
7:28 AM
@Aghori Who decided what women should do and what men should do?
 
@RakeshJoshi read this article
 
Women are trying to aping men, it is nothing but paradharma which is not in accordance of Dharma.
@KrishnShweta Simple, natural aptitude.
 
@TheDestroyer if swatantrya does not mean independance then what is the antonym of that word ?
 
Krish!!
 
Independence with awareness is benediction, without awareness curse.
 
7:32 AM
@Aghori "women trying to do what men are good at, men trying to do what women are good at " What women and men are trying to do? What he is talking about?
 
@TheDestroyer looks like some vishissht-advaitin has written this article
@TheDestroyer somedays back you were opposing manu smriti now supporting it ?
 
@TheDestroyer - VASTU-DOSHA 😆
 
@Aghori ??
 
Take simple example @TheDestroyer there are 50 houses & each house has 1 family consisting of Father, Mother & 2 sons therefore total 50 families.. suppose there are 50 posts in a company. Every family needs one representative for that particular post otherwise family would starve. Some family is doomed to starve if any family sends 2 employees for job.
Now this is happening. there are 12 such couple both got the job. Resulting in two jobs per family. Therefore 12 families are starved to death.
 
@Tezz - महोदय , आप भि अपना मत प्रकट किजिये , आप के विचार हमे सुनने दिजीये :)
 
7:40 AM
And 12 families eating more than required.
When one earns more than required, someone on the planet gets less than required.
@KrishnShweta have answered you as well with above example.
 
@Aghori - I didn't got this concept , how come ? Resources are plenty , only situation ,opportunity matters , i think
 
That's why women shouldn't be allowed to earn as long as his family earning less than required.
@SwiftPushkar there is a post in company, my family is starving. But that post has been hijacked by a women which I could get ,when her husband was working there already.
Little example.
2 job in one house there. But no job here.
1 family getting more than necessary but 1 getting less than necessary.
 
@Aghori isro entry level scientist salary is rs 56000 is it more than requirenment or less than requirement ?
 
Women are getting reservation everywhere, I'm against of it.
 
Nothing wrong in earning more than required. One can try in other company as well.
 
7:45 AM
Nothing wrong if there is no poor left. @KrishnShweta
 
So, let men stop working. Why are saying women to give up?
 
Then who will care for child?
 
@Aghori - yeah , but men can work at any place , not the women , he can move grt. distances in search for better job , women generally can't , and if the women has the right talent for that particular job then she should be allowed , And one other family afterall gets supported by one women working also
 
what about the unknown future expenses ? who will save for it ?
 
Only women have aptitude to raise a child. @KrishnShweta Don't speak out of gendered ego.
 
7:47 AM
my aunt was a working women and yet raised her children so well..
 
I don't have any gender ego.
 
@AnkitSharma - Nice Avatara :) a total change from chocolate boy to , small kid :)
 
who started the reservations in the first place ? do u think its started during ambedkar?
 
you started saying women to give up. @Aghori I didn't
 
It was mistake of upper castes
 
7:48 AM
@SwiftPushkar this one is from The Lego Batman, previous one was a Singer
 
mistake of upper caste MEN
 
Yes women shouldn't be allowed to earn as long as her family is earning less than required. I am firmed on my conviction. I believe in universal harmony not individual.
 
@Aghori O.o
 
Yes @RakeshJoshi Due to ego.
 
@Aghori dont be jealous because your position were grabbed by other girls
 
7:50 AM
Hahaha
 
@RakeshJoshi lol
 
try to become more conpetant instread of thinking such mindset
 
I'm not speaking to heal personal wounds. I am saying after deeply analysing the situation.
 
I believe in equality and everyone should be allowed to go for any job they want men or women or kinnar
 
You can read above messages. I've already explained.
 
7:51 AM
@AnkitSharma - he resembles "The Incredibles" kid :)
 
@SwiftPushkar ohh, no this one is Robin from The Lego Batman film
 
You didn't get me. @RakeshJoshi there won't be equality with such mindsets of yours. There always will remain poors.
 
@Aghori ultill humanity exists poors and richs will continue to exist
 
There is no such rule.
 
@AnkitSharma - yeah u told already :) You are getting smaller & smaller month by month , whts the secret ?
 
7:54 AM
see from the earliest time
 
One should always get basic requirements like Roti, Kapda & Makan.
 
from the time immemorial there has been differences in society
ideal society cannot exist .
 
11 mins ago, by Aghori
@SwiftPushkar there is a post in company, my family is starving. But that post has been hijacked by a women which I could get ,when her husband was working there already.
This is example, nothing happening so.
:P
 
@SwiftPushkar I am a complan boy
 
so my father is earning good then i should not work also ?

are we doing social work here?
 
7:56 AM
@AnkitSharma - complan D :)
 
That mindset is worng
 
@Tezz - Ashu means quick , Its another name of Lord Shiva." In Hindi, the word means "Fast:)
 
Instead of saying, provide a fault in my above examples. @AnkitSharma
 
@RakeshJoshi How does philosophy matter here? This is not about Brahman or some other thing.
 
@Aghori If one family have two people ( introspective of gender), both capable of earning for whole family, so by your rule one should not work ?
 
7:57 AM
Yes.
 
@RakeshJoshi I oppose only some verses like pouring molten lead into ears of Sudra,
 
That's wastage of one person potential
 
@SwiftPushkar ??
 
If working of only husband is sufficient
 
@TheDestroyer i have already toild u about contribution of vedantins in shudra and women issue
 
7:58 AM
@TheDestroyer
1
Q: What are the Twelve Hymns beginning with 'Aashu' whose Lord is Indra?

TezzLord Agni in Agni Purana chapter 296 tells about Five Mantras used in worship of Lord Rudra. The chapter is itself named as 'The Five Constituents of the worship of Rudra.': Fire God Said: 1-2 I shall describe the five constituents of the worship of Rudra. It is the most excellent that c...

 
What about the someone who don't have a single job. His family is starving.
 
@Aghori all the graduttes should opt for work .. else what is use of education? country needs skilled workers
 
Give women different education. Simple.
Femininely education.
 
@Aghori then give your income to poor .. no point of speaking goody words
 
@Aghori but what if wife is more talented ?
 
8:00 AM
I would have given, had it been worked.
 
@SwiftPushkar I'm aware that Aashutosh is name of Lord Shiva.... but I don't think this is related to this hymn...
 
@AnkitSharma - yeah , thats my point :)
@Tezz - hmm , ok , it was just a comment , just given u the name :)
 
@TheDestroyer have u gone through whole smriti ?
 
@Aghori that's wrong at fundamental level
 
@AnkitSharma C ya. :)
 
8:01 AM
@AnkitSharma wife should use her talent to raise a child then. Using such talent she could raise a divine life.
 
@Aghori I think this example may not be correct.Given cost of living and other things, both should work.
 
Instead of saying wrong. Better you point out a particular fault. @AnkitSharma
 
@Aghori that's too close minded thinking which I can't relate with
@Aghori I did but you ignored
You are making talented females to sit in house and raise kids
 
Close minded because you have been being taught to have aversion with such thoughts since childhood. :) @AnkitSharma
 
You call it aversion I call it equality
 
8:04 AM
@AnkitSharma Yes, if a family is stopped from starvation at the expense of sitting of talented woman at home. I am in support of such sitting. :)
 
@Aghori 50 people should get jobs from 50 families

in that scenario its imppssoble that all 50 candidates have same skills and abilites

only the fit candidates with skills would get job

not just because "there is no one earning in my family"
so if one family there is no one with good sills then obviously other familiies will get multiple jobs
 
@Aghori someone will always going to be starved, blame population, government but not working woman
 
@Aghori She can raise kids and do work from home too. :P
 
so the crux is "work on your skills and abilities" enhance it .. enrih it
 
Yes @TheDestroyer have you read above messages?
@AnkitSharma No there was less poverty when women were not allowed to earn.
 
8:06 AM
If one family have no talented person then?
@Aghori give me stats not baseless claims
 
@Aghori But Irrespective of whether women working good or not, Cost of living is forcing women to work. It became their SwaDharma now.
 
we are not doing social work to give jobs to unskilled people
 
I agree with @Aghori : Both have their own significance and areas. They should work as complement/supplement instead of competitor.
 
Take this @AnkitSharma
 
@TheDestroyer - Yeah , that's one of the main points :)
 
8:08 AM
India was rich when he visited. What to talk about before?
 
@TheDestroyer let men not decide the swadharma of a woman
 
@SS Well, researched answer on Hanuman.
 
@TheDestroyer I'm saying in case of more than required. If such so she can work..
 
@Aghori take form India's perspective and include issues like population, poverty, greed of biy child etc and then you will find the reasons
 
@RakeshJoshi Also, tell women not do things to satisfy their ego (like, why can't i do when a man can do)? Same applies for men too.
 
S S
8:09 AM
@TheDestroyer Thanks.
 
@AnkitSharma I've given you a claim. Now you are updating your claims.
 
@Aghori India faced lots of other stuff and working woman is not the one of them
 
no one will strain themselves ... but now money is the highest power so all are behind it.. be it men or women ... nothing wrong in it
@TheDestroyer
 
@AnkitSharma Because women never worked. :)
 
@Aghori your claim are based on your own thinking and far from reality
 
8:10 AM
Like today.
 
@Aghori so you mean Indian is not developed country because women work here ?
 
Not far from reality I've given you an example. You can apply that to bigger picture. @AnkitSharma
 
Compare it with developed rich nations and do the maths
 
@AnkitSharma I've never said so. I'm pointing 1 case among many.
 
I'm also agree with @Aghori that reservation should not be without considering areas. (And yes, education should also be in accordance)
 
8:13 AM
@AnkitSharma lol, Earth is one . Any country if gets more than necessary, some country gets less than necessary.
 
I am fully against reservation
 
@AnkitSharma We can't take for granted everything is correct in developed nations. We should see multitudes of factors before we compare India and West. Rich is not true developement and materially poor is not underdevelopment.
 
Cya m lunch.
 
@TheDestroyer west nation have issues too but my point is giving working equality to both gender is not a issue at all.
 
@AnkitSharma ok.
 
8:17 AM
We will have no one like P. T. Usha and Mary Kom with this kind of mentality in future
If they were also forced to raise kids only they might not have raised our Nation's name
 
@AnkitSharma EVen in past there were female Yoginis in India. They were like Male Yogis. So, working should be no problem if they do it properly (fulfilling all their Swadharmas properly).
 
Fulfilling your dreams is not adharma either
 
@AnkitSharma It is passion. Yes, not Adharma.
 
Patriarchy is a narrow thinking and I can't support it at all. My mom is also a house wife but that was by choice not force.
 
@AnkitSharma But don't get carried by that emotion. Even too much of freedom for women is dangerous. Fake feminism we are seeing now in India is result of that. There should equality in true sense.
 
8:24 AM
Ms. Chanda Kochhar
 
@TheDestroyer what is too much according to you?
 
S S
Speaking of feminism, here's a video you might like.
 
@SS seen it already
 
S S
@AnkitSharma it is for others. I posted it in other room a while ago. You rushed in middle. :D
 
8:27 AM
lol, k
 
@SS - haha :)
 
To me working in a respected job, following a passion, marrying at your own choice or not marrying at all is all fine to me
 
The whole scenario today is a reaction of what they went through in the past ..
they were denied education , religious equality, social equality , denied to work .. financial freedom etc.

now they want to get educated and be financially independant there is nothing wrong i it
@AnkitSharma cool that
for a nations development we need all skillled people to contribute regardless of gender.
let all the family members work ... it will help nation grow .
 
@RakeshJoshi agreed
 
those who dont have jobs and are struggling to run a family should not procreate if their circumstances are such.
i have seen people complain or poverty but then keep on giving birth to children which is burden to them as well as to the country.
 
8:31 AM
@RakeshJoshi agreed
 
reservations were not started by ambedkar ..

in the temple and royal families all there were reservations that only so and so people can be have that job
 
@RakeshJoshi And most of them keep on procreating untill they get male child. And, they face Karma for that later in form of poverty.
 
@RakeshJoshi - yes , but that means only eligible can have that job , & not a discount like we have today
 
8:34 AM
so its not our dutty to think of them ..

i have seen slum people keep on giving birth to child this is a sad situation

when you yourself is living on road then how can u raise a child ?

he will either turn into a beggar or a criminal
@SwiftPushkar

first let them give away the reservation in temples which they had for milleniums
 
@TheDestroyer - yeah , more children for farming / earning and financial security , is also one of the reason
 
@RakeshJoshi i have seen many people who are allotted houses from Governement don't stay in those houses and instead decide to stay in their slums and they give Governement allotted houses for rents.
 
so we are not going to give up jobs for the poor .. instead they should think of family planning
 
@RakeshJoshi - Yes one should change himself to brahmin and can get the gob
 
who allows ? they only believe birth based system .. go to any gurukul and verify yourself
 
8:39 AM
Will be back ..
 
@RakeshJoshi This birth based caste is doing more harm now. Politics in India is soley decided by Caste (most of those politicians have no idea of Varna).
 
so that is what i m saying
reservation is not started by shudras or women

it was started centuries back by higher caste men

the present reservation is just a reaction to the past centuries.,
 
@RakeshJoshi - their are lots of Gurav priests in shiva temples in MH who are not Brahmins , and let someone who changes should maintain brahminhood for 3-4 generations and then let his children have that job so someone at least should start the process.
 
why not major temples ??? jyotirlingas ?
go and ask in pathshala if they will teach to a non brahmin
 
@RakeshJoshi - temple reservations for puja is totally different than , job reservation , the reasons are different
 
8:43 AM
what reasons ?
 
@RakeshJoshi - Purity of mind , knowing of correct mantras , vedas , vedic study , knowing correct puja procedure etc . there are very few jobs , and these are not jobs , these are positions. Pujari /priest , and associated persons
 
so what is why i m saying .. only when u allow people to pathshala they can become brahmins ...

one one hand you dont allow them to vedas and then say that temple requires brahmins oinly
many of my relatives are working as priests .. its certainly a job

they get PAID for their work ...

there is a well defined trust of the temple
 
@RakeshJoshi - i already told you in rishikesh pathshala everyone is allowed
 
talk of maharastra yaar why going to other states ?
talk of alandi ,, nashik ..
 
@RakeshJoshi - then who is gona pay them , and what about their families ?
 
8:49 AM
means ?
 
@RakeshJoshi - they get PAID for their work ...
 
yes temple trust pays them monthly salary ? r u not aware of this ? !!

do u think priests work free of cost ?
 
S S
@RakeshJoshi Temple reservations and job reservations are two different topics.
 
why different ?
 
@RakeshJoshi - its not only issue of MH its issue of Hinduism and whole india as well as abroad , as many new temples are being built all over world
7 mins ago, by SwiftPushkar
@RakeshJoshi - temple reservations for puja is totally different than , job reservation , the reasons are different
 
S S
8:51 AM
@RakeshJoshi how are they same?
 
when brahmins claim for temple and rituals jobs

when kshatriyas claimed over royyal jobs then what is left for women and shudras ?

that is why they have got their reservation NOW
@SS how do you define a job ?
a service ?
 
S S
So is this a revenge?
 
this is reaction built over centuries
 
@RakeshJoshi - its declared by our scriptures , and people followed it , not " reaction built over centuries"
 
scripture allows changes of varna..
how shivaji became king ?
 
S S
8:54 AM
I destroy your caste for some generations, you do that when you got chance for some generations. It is like this. It will be like a cycle..
 
how vishwamitra became brahmarishi?
@SS yes its cycle .. so better to stop it to avoid future conflicts
While talking about purification of material objects (women are only objects) the smritis say Ashtavarshaa bhaved gouri nava varshaa tu rohini | dasa varsha bhavet kanya ata urdhvam rajaswalaa|| praapte tu dvaadashe vashe ya: kanyaam na prayacchati | maasi maasi rajastasyaa: pibanti pitara: svayam ||

An eight year old girl is known as gouri at nine she is called rohini. At ten she is called kanyaa and above ten she is rajaswalaa. If a girl on her attaining 12 th year is not given away (in marriage) every month the ancestors drink her menstrual blood !
 
@RakeshJoshi - then let someone who wants to be priest maintain some high values , for some generations and let him do the job .. No problem , is it a giveaway post ? it needs years of learning , following of dharma , and study of scriptures at guru-graha :)
 
S S
@RakeshJoshi Here I meant in public sector i.e., government jobs
 
then allow all to undertake vedic studies and make themselves eligible for pristhood @SwiftPushkar
 
Thanks @Pandya you understood what I meant. :)
 
8:58 AM
@RakeshJoshi - Every school has its own rules , some are open to some specific followers , like in Astavinayaka temples , a priest should be a ganpatya , and should be well versed with ganapati puja , same to Tirupati and other places
 
S S
@RakeshJoshi Also in competitive exams like civils, jee main, advanced
 
ha ha ha priest made rules ?
 
@RakeshJoshi - Is a civil engineer is fitted to work as a bio-technologist ? Same rule applies
 
dont try to twist the topic .. if shudra wish to become prist will you allow him to study vedas and other needed scriptures ?
 
Doctors are rigorously trained , the collages maintain strict merit based system in admissions in order to avoid any not eligible candidate to be a doctor .. Muunna Bhai MBBS only in movies 😀
 
9:03 AM
but doctor training is open to all ..
 
@RakeshJoshi - I am not twisting , but the topic itself is twisted one :)
 
that everyone is seeing what is being asked and what you have been replying
 
This is just a example , don't take it as a perfect example but is similar
 
@TheDestroyer Swadharma is nothing but acting according to one's aptitude & aptitude is a result of Samskars accumulated over the chitta from previous births. It won't exhaust without working in accordance of Swadharma. I will write a well researched answer next year on this..
 
@RakeshJoshi - yeah , will listen :) Thanks 💐
 
9:35 AM
i think this question is not good . should be closed
2
Q: Is there scriptural basis for Prabhupāda's commentary on women like being raped?

sv.From Prabhupāda commentary on SB 4.25.41: In this regard, the word vikhyātam is very significant. A man is always famous for his aggression toward a beautiful woman, and such aggression is sometimes considered rape. Although rape is not legally allowed, it is a fact that a woman likes a man w...

 
10:05 AM
@RakeshJoshi - Nice find , i have aslo downloaded Rudraastaadhyayi from - ia800802.us.archive.org/35/items/HindiBook--rudrashtadhyayi.pdf/…
 
ok good .. but if find slow chanting then it will be good .
 
@RakeshJoshi - hmm right , the link is a PDF book , i think probably the which from u given the screenshot
 
 
2 hours later…
12:16 PM
@Aghori Actually I've also similar thoughts for those points.
@RakeshJoshi Hey. I've seen that person looks (in some TV programs) the thumbnail of video you've shared. He is Gujarati if I'm correctly remembered.
 
good
 
@RakeshJoshi why don't you follow reply button. It's sometimes difficult to predict whom you're replying.
@KeshavSrinivasan Vanakkam. I've one question regarding incarnation of god according to Vishishtadvaita.
 
12:37 PM
@LakshmiNarayanan Namaste.
 
@Pandya Vanakkam!
@Pandya I'm curious to know this question! :D
 
@LakshmiNarayanan wow! It sounds you've started to read Sri Rananujacharya's Bhasya on either BG or BS.
 
@Pandya I'm reading something on Ramanuja's take on BG :) My curiosity is in no way indicative of my capacity to answer the question lol
 
@Pandya Vanakkam
@Pandya What's your question?
 
12:53 PM
@KeshavSrinivasan When Brahman/Vishnu takes Avatar as Rama, Rama's body have only Paramatma or Jivatma also?
 
@Pandya Only Paramatma. There are two kinds of Avataras, Avesha Avataras and non-Avesha Avataras. Avesha Avataras have Jivas in them, non-Avesha Avataras don't.
2
@Pandya Vyasa is an example of an Avesha Avatara; his previous birth was a rishi named Apantaratamas who was not an incarnation of Vishnu, but then Vishnu blessed him to be an Avesha Avatara in his next birth.
 
@KeshavSrinivasan wow! Good thing to know. So, 10 Avatars of Vishnu are non-Avesha Avatars which doesn't have Jivatmas right?
 
@Pandya You mean non-Avesha Avataras, right?
 
@KeshavSrinivasan oh! Yes.
 
@Pandya By the way, the Avesha Avatara/non-Avesha Avatara distinction should not be confused with the Purna Avatara/Amsha Avatara distinction. That distinction is about how many of Vishnu's Kalyana Gunas an Avatara possesses.
 
04:00 - 13:0013:00 - 19:00

« first day (418 days earlier)      last day (2146 days later) »