10:14 AM
@jmort253 Do you think all the
s/SCRUM/Scrum/g
edits on pm.stackexchange.com/questions/6249/… qualify as trivial?
@jmort253 They aren't wrong, but I thought they were trivial, and I have some heartburn about people changing direct quotes in answers which have the potential to misrepresent authorial intent. --In this case, a rollback would just increment the wiki counter for no good reason, and I'm not sure I disagree with the edit enough to do that. I just wanted some feedback on the "triviality index" before I metafy my $0.02 in typical style. :)
5 hours later…
2:47 PM
If there is one misspelled or misrepresented word, and it's important enough to edit, I'll fix it, but at the same time, I also fix other issues with the post, since edits should be substantial.
If there isn't anything else to fix, then "substantial" could be defined in terms of quality than quantity. Scrum is an important word on our site, and I believe Lunivore's edits make it look more like a site for professionals.
If this went into the review queue, I'd scan the post for other errors. If the person didn't fix everything (or most of everything), I'd reject and then edit it myself. But if there was nothing else to fix, or most things were fixed, I'd approve.
3:25 PM
« first day (495 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (3289 days later) »