« first day (44 days earlier)      last day (4285 days later) » 

Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
5:22 AM
There are a few new tags - keep them or retag?
They were all introduced by Code-Guru.
I think they could also be retagged from set-theory to elementary-set-theory.
***********
Personally I think that (cartesian-product) and (partial-orders) are superfluous.
I am not sure about partial-orders. Would posets deserve separate tag? Would equivalence relations deserve separate tag, too? (They are two special classes of relations, that are most frequently taught.)
 
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
5:39 AM
Sorry I meant to write that (cartesian-procduct) and (preorders) seem to be superfluous. And that I am not sure about (partial-orders).
Anyway, I'll wait to see what others think about this. (There is no doubt some other people will notice this among new tags, too.)
 
 
2 hours later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
8:08 AM
@WillieWong We have discussed some time ago whether holder-spaces is intended for Lipschitz functions too, see here.
I've added this tag to a new question on Lipschitz functions.
 
 
7 hours later…
Willie Wong
Willie Wong
3:25 PM
I am not entire convinced that we need partial-orders or preorders when relations and order-theory are available. Thoughts?
 
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
I agree that combination of order-theory with relations is sufficient to suggest that the question is about some kind of partial order (or preorder).
And I think that (cartesian-product) falls under the elementary-set-theory.
I have to go afk now, I'll be back approximately in an hour. I can retag some of the questions when I'm back.
(Or maybe I'll find them retagged when I come back....)
 
J. M.
J. M.
3:40 PM
@MartinSleziak I wasn't sure about the other tag, so I left it and hoped somebody else might have something more decisive. But yes, Willie's explanation of why I appended big-list is correct.
 

« first day (44 days earlier)      last day (4285 days later) »