Proposal: pluralize planar-graph, bipartite-graph, chordal-graph, and signed-graph.
(To match random-graphs, directed-graphs, cayley-graphs, infinite-graphs, and hypergraphs, as well as the general philosophy of having things be plural.)
I'm actually not super convinced signed graphs are common...
But to switch to something on-topic for this room : so far I've wanted to wait for more reaction to my proposal about accessible/locally presentable categories, but it doesn't seem to get much reaction. Nobody has objected, but it only got 3 upvotes. Do you think this shows sufficient approval for me to go ahead and create the tag?
Proposal : tag(s) for accessible and locally presentable categories
A couple months ago someone created (among others) the tags locally presentable categories and accessible categories, but they were removed. Now this is not really my specialty, but I think these tags could be useful, and in fac...
@ArnaudD. I was thinking about those two tags recently, too. I don't expect that too much additional feedback on that post. Considering that this topic is probably interesting mostly for category theorist, I'd think that creating the tag would be reasonable. (Taking into account that there are many people for which this area is rather distant, I think that score +4 shows non-trivial support.)
Probably it would be reasonable to notify the user who created the tag originally (after the tags are created). They also asked about discussions on tag-creation on meta: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/29516/…
@MartinSleziak Since the original creator actually asked a new question, I took the opportunity to recreate the tag locally-presentable-categories. I have suggested an edit for the tag-excerpt and tag-wiki so that we have something, but it should probably be adjusted later (right now I am a bit in a hurry).
Proposal: rename "singularvalues" to singular-values
There's no usage guidance and tag wiki yet.
