9:05 AM
specific-question Would dimension-theory-analysis be suitable for questions about box dimension, such as: Proof of equivalent definitions of $\dim_B F$ (box-dimension) of a subset $F \subset \mathbb R^n$ (Falconer)
-1
Main Theme of Question: I aim to establish the equivalence of definitions of $\dim_B F$ (i.e. the box-counting dimension) for $F\subset\mathbb R^n$. Following is an extract from Kenneth Falconer's Fractal Geometry. The author proves (1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (4) and (1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (5). I need ...
in CURED, 2 mins ago, by Martin Sleziak
@epsilon-emperor Looking at the tags at that question, the tag analysis seems mostly useless. Since it is about box dimension, maybe dimension-theory-analysis would be suitable?
There are some discussions on meta related to the analysis tag, such as: Should the (analysis) tag be deprecated? and How should the “analysis” tag be used?
9:55 AM
0
Main Theme of Question: I aim to establish the equivalence of definitions of $\dim_B F$ (i.e. the box-counting dimension) for $F\subset\mathbb R^n$. Following is an extract from Kenneth Falconer's Fractal Geometry. The author proves (1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (4) and (1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (5). I need ...
7 hours later…
5:08 PM
Should we add the tag weak-convergence a question about "strong operator convergence"? The tag strong-convergence exists, but it refers to the usual convergence (in norm).
« first day (3261 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1068 days later) »