@TheGreatDuck My personal opinion is that if you create a new tag for some new notion, which is not generally known in literature and is your own invention, then the tag will probably not survive very long.
An at the moment all posts about this topic can be found by searching for: user:289789 [floor-function] is:q math.stackexchange.com/…;.
I did not study your questions in detail, but my impression is that there are still some unclear notions in your posts. And it seems that some other users have the same opinion:
These sound interesting, but I think you need to explain several of these a bit more. — Paulyesterday
I wonder what would happen if a deleted question, which has a blacklisted tag, was undeleted. But I guess the tag would be simply removed. For example, this question is tagged homework.
@johnny09 If you can chat here, you can chat in Physics rooms too, and in any other chat.stackexchange.com room. They are not separate in terms of privileges. The chat calculates some aggregated reputation, and uses it for all rooms.
@MartinSleziak I'm speaking in the future tense sense of if it were to become something academically recognized and used often, would it become a new tag or is it something you think should stay under floor-function?
There is enough mess with the already existing tags. I do not have need to discuss hypothetical future tags brought by hypothetical future advances in mathematics.
I guess it was more of a question in whether or not the subject is something broad enough to warrant a tag or if it's something that you believe is not the sort of thing to warrant a tag in general (regardless of whether or not it is well known or popular). Sorry to disturb or bother you.
