« first day (776 days earlier)      last day (4236 days later) » 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

12:02 AM
Anyone around?
 
12:25 AM
eh?
 
@anon what's the eh for?
 
nothing
 
Question
 
Answer In Form of Rhetorical Question
 
Define a relación on $\Bbb C$ by $z\sim w$ iff $|z|=|w|$
then $\Bbb C/\sim $ should be similar to $\Bbb R$ no?
 
12:41 AM
yes
Though it'd make more sense to use [0,inf)
then you can make the isomorphism one of (in the first case, quotient) monoids (under multiplication) instead of just as sets (which just uses bare cardinality for an isomorphism between classes of complex numbers and reals)
If you take 0 out of C you get an abelian group isomorphism $\Bbb C^\times/\sim\,\,\cong (\Bbb R,+)$ via $[z]\mapsto \log|z|$
 
Yes, true [0,inf) seems better
 
also you can put topologies on errything and retain the isomorphisms
 
What is a monoid?
 
set with associative multiplication; no inverses necessarily but an identity element
Anybody know a name for the set $E_a=\{0,1,\cdots,a\}$ with operations $x\oplus y:=\min\{x,y\}$, $x\otimes y:=\min\{x+y,a\}$? I believe it is a commutative ring (so associativity and distributivity hold).
 
Like what you add to a group to get a ring
 
1:06 AM
a semiring, maybe, anon
because you are not going to have additive inverses
there is a famous semiring, called the tropical algebra, or the max-plus semiring
which is somewhat similar
 
@mariano Hello
 
Reading soc y estado here. Oh god why
 
So a ring with no inverses is called a semi ring?
 
1:15 AM
with no additive inverses
$\mathbb N_0$ with its usual addition and multiplication, for example
 
1:55 AM
to show e^x for latex one types $e^x$ however, on the title of my question it showing as exp(x). why?
 
2:07 AM
Because you never typed e^x in the title*, you typed `$exp(x)$` which Byron changed to $\exp(x)$.

*Unless you originally had e^x in the title and then deliberately changed it to exp(x) within five minutes (edits in the first five minutes are not publicly documented).
 
2:17 AM
@anon wow, I'm a moron.
 
3:00 AM
I have a proof to write and the expressions are so absurdly long that one term fills up a whole line...
 
leo
3:25 AM
hello there!
 
leo
3:37 AM
Given a compact set $K$ of $\Bbb R^n$ and an open nhbhd $U$ of $K$, I'm trying to prove that there is a $C^\infty$ function $f:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ so that $f_{|K}\equiv 1$ and the support of $f$ is contained in $U$.
I've proved that given an open bounded set $A$, there exist a function $f:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ such that $f$ is $C^\infty$ and is positive over $A$. So I've tried take $g:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ of class $C^\infty$, positive over $U\setminus K$ which is open (and bounded without loose) and then consider $f=\chi_K+g$. This function is identicaly $1$ over $K$, but it can fail to be $C^\infty$
so, I'm stuck
any idea?
 
3:53 AM
seems like a job for some form of mollification. not something I have experience with.
 
this is done in Lee's book on smooth manifolds, which you can find online
 
leo
what I've typed above it's almost the finish. All start with bump functions
 
you need to be very lucky to to this with a mollifier
because the inf of the distances from points of K to the complement of U might be zero
so using a mollifier (which has a fixed support) is going to be impossible
 
leo
4:09 AM
I've done some things with mollifiers before, but no idea how to approach this in that way
@PeterTamaroff heyo!
 
4:32 AM
Is there a way to avoid this:
 
how did you even get that
\frac{ac-b^2}{a-2b+c}=\frac{bd-c^2}{b-2c+c^2} should work fine, no?
 
@anon Lemme try it.
Nope. Same thing.
 
works for me on main. whatever is rendering it is the problem for you. is it on mse? if so what browser etc?
 
Chrome.
Lemme try another browser.
It works fine on firefox.
 
 
2 hours later…
user19161
6:41 AM
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez Hehe, that's only a pre-first edition draft though. Anyway the second edition is out, since you mentioned it. It's one and a half times as long as the first edition.
 
user19161
@GustavoBandeira Yes, Chrome has problems with chat and math for me. I guess it is because it is not so responsive.
 
@WillHunting My TeX says command \mathscr not found. Strange! \mathcal, \mathfrak work though.
 
You need a package like rsfs
 
@ZhenLin Okay. According to this link , amsfonts should have been sufficient, but it is probably wrong then. My distribution does not have rsfs by default it seems, will have to get it separately I guess.
 
\mathscr is sometimes used as an alias for \mathcal, but I guess you want them to be different fonts.
 
6:53 AM
@ZhenLin Yes.
 
 
5 hours later…
11:31 AM
@robjohn I made this question:
0
Q: A list of books for discovering mathematics using computer software

Gustavo BandeiraI'm searching for books that allow one to discover/experiment with mathematics by using computer environments such as Mathematica/Magma/Magma/Pari-GP, etc. Until now, I discovered these: Discovering Mathematics: A Problem-Solving Approach to Mathematical Analysis with MATHEMATICA® and Maple(T...

Someone suggested that it would be better to make it CW. What do you think?
 
@Gustavo you have interesting questions!
 
11:47 AM
@ParthKohli Yep. I'm trying to build a body of mathematical culture.
2
By knowing names, ideas, etc.
 
Very interesting, @Gustavo.
 
12:24 PM
Hey, quickie question.
What's the proof? "The powerset of an arbitrary set $\mathbf{A}$ with $n$ elements contains $2^n$ elements."
 
@ZhenLin I posted an answer to one of your questions.
The torsion part is isomorphic to $\Bbb{Z}/n\Bbb{Z}$
 
12:52 PM
Darn, you Math people!
 
@JonasTeuwen: I see you have returned :-)
 
1:22 PM
@Path By induction. Let $S$ be a set with $n-1$ elements, assume that $|P(S)|=2^{n-1}$ and let $x\notin S$. Then you can show that $|P(S\cup\{x\}|=2^n$ by showing that to each subset containing $x$, there corresponds exactly one subset not comtaining $x$.
 
1:33 PM
@MichaelGreinecker I don't think that will ping @Parth
Off to the park. BBL
 
2:09 PM
@MichaelGreinecker Be Back Later.
 
@robjohn You are back from the park?
 
@MichaelGreinecker Indeed. It is later :-)
 
@robjohn I need a clock that shows later.
 
2:40 PM
@Michael that was easy. Thanks!
I know that this question is too ambiguous, but here: How did you become a Math guy?
 
@ParthKohli Actually, I'm an economist. But I like thinking a lot.
 
@Michael: Great, thinking is to mind what exercising is to the body :-)
By the way, the above question was for all of you!
 
@ParthKohli I don't have much time and have to go for dinner but my personal advice is probably start doing math and always try to do challenging stuff. In mathematics ,the quote "The work will teach you how to do it." cannot be overstated enough.
 
Of course, I do a lot of Math!
advice taken
 
Then you are good! And patience is second quality I guess which is very important.
Anyway, really have to go now, see you later.
 
2:52 PM
Thank you, @Jayesh.
 
3:51 PM
if $n = \frac{a}{b}$ where n, a, b are integers, is $n$ a rational number, or does $gcd(a, b)$ have to equal $1$?
 
@JaydonZhao a/b is a rational number. it can also be a natural number. It is not necessary for gcd(a,b)=1 for a/b to not be a natural number: it is only necessary that b not evenly divide into a (which is not equivalent to their being relatively prime; consider nonreduced fractions, like 10/6).
 
We consider $\gcd(a,b) = 1$ in certain proofs by contradiction. For example, prove that square root of 2 is irrational.
 
okay, thanks :)
 
I THROW [STACK OVERFLOW]( math.stackexchange.com/users/8671/graphth) ON THE GROUND!!!!!!
 
4:12 PM
@GustavoBandeira ?!?!??
 
@GustavoBandeira ?????
 
Now it's corrected. =)
 
@GustavoBandeira ?!?!?!!
 
Just look the links again.
I was in a tablet, then I couldn't type precisely.
 
@GustavoBandeira I can read. So ??!?!??!?
 
4:25 PM
Nothing.
I'm out.
Peace.
 
4:58 PM
Hello there.
 
Hello
 
hello guys!
 
Hey, @Noah and @SosiKun.
 
could someone tell me of some very good resources to study algebra and calculus?
 
@SosiKun try the Khan Academy
 
5:05 PM
i'm sorry if this is covered in a question somewhere, but I can't seem to find a reference URL and I wonder if this was covered somewhere
 
 
@Noah, thanks, I'll check it out!
do you know of any other? :)
 
I think this is one of the best
it's vid based
and is well known
 
mhm :)
thanks so much!
i'm checking it out now!
 
5:19 PM
wow man, that's a really cool website!
 
It actually is, yeah.
 
thanks guys, I'm off! Thanks for the input
 
6:05 PM
@robjohn I have!
@robjohn A couple of people e-mailed me which made me feel somewhat actually liked here 8-).
5
And since that is for most people quite a rare feeling I decided to embrace it. Kinda.
4
 
@JonasTeuwen Of course you are liked here. I could not find the reason you were suspended. Was it just chat or the main site?
 
@robjohn I said the following, I believe: "We need less of these Sovjet Russia jokes and more gay themed ones!" (a joke with reference to the statement we need less of the last ones...)
4
I am unable to see something offending in that...
Of course, cultures are different, but that might quite well be one of the least offending jokes you could make in this country 8-).
 
@JonasTeuwen touching any sensitive subject (gays for instance) can set some people off
 
It never occurred to me as a sensitive subject.
But maybe people might think this country is really crazy allowing euthanasia, abortion and even gay marriage.
 
@JonasTeuwen for some people it is, and so I usually refrain from commenting on it
 
6:10 PM
Yes, but I still don't see it as a reason to flag. Who here would do that? They make much harsher statements!
And that is clearly a joke. Not even containing a deadly disease (which I would understand).
 
@JonasTeuwen definitely there are a lot of people in the US that would find those awful.
 
@robjohn Yes, I know.
(here too, but way less, I suppose as there is almost no political party against it)
 
@JonasTeuwen there are a lot of visitors here. As I said, I could not find any information (not that I could tell what I found if I did)
 
Can also not signed-in users flag?
And who the heck would approve that.
If you get suspended for something like that!
 
@JonasTeuwen you mean unregistered users? I don't know. I wouldn't think so.
 
6:12 PM
That's ridiculous. Sure, it might be sensitive for some people, but I never targeted anybody directly so they should just mind their own business (I think).
At least! I would not feel very comfortable around somebody like that!
But oh well, happened. Fine!
I'm okay. Back to maths.
 
@JonasTeuwen That is the best strategy :-)
 
But I do wonder what the stereotype Dutch looks like to Americans :-)).
Americans are fat, ugly and stupid. Also very religious. (Don't suspend me!)
 
@JonasTeuwen I'm glad you're back :)
 
@JohnJunior Hello. John.
 
@JonasTeuwen I don't know of any stereotype for the Dutch. I generally think of windmills and sabots when I think of Holland.
 
6:14 PM
I think of the scene from Austin Powers.
 
@robjohn Those are actually here!
But a bit rare, though 8-(.
But there are some really classical Dutch villages where you would see those 8-).
 
"There's only two kinds of people I can't stand: those intolerant of other cultures, and the Dutch"
 
Does that mean that the Dutch are not intolerant of other cultures?
I beg to differ!
They are tolerant as far as other cultures does not influence theirs in their own country.
 
I think it was mostly juxtapositional irony :)
 
For example immigrants demanding restriction of freedom of speech, or more strict drugs rules and so on.
They turn into like war machines if that might happen. Not so tolerant 8-).
And for the rest, other cultures are interesting in the way looking at monkeys is. It is fun to see, but you would not want to be in their cage.
Monkey.
I wonder how people look at the "USA for Africa" song nowadays.
To me it looks very sincere, but also a bit like they seem to think there are only clay huts in Africa 8-). It is like the biggest continent on the world with people. And there are like big cities and such. And hospitals and universities. Crazy eh...?
This is a weird country actually: the political leader goes on a bike to work 8-).
 
user19161
6:31 PM
Hello bros!
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen This sounds pretty offensive to others! But I am OK.
 
@WillHunting Hey. Sexy thing.
@WillHunting That's the stereotype!
All Singaporians... uh like to hang foreigners for throwing a can on the floor!
 
user19161
To me, most humans are rather stupid and evil, I am sick and tired of this world.
 
@WillHunting But you believe in reincarnation, right?
So, if you die.
You will end up in the same shit again.
So do not die.
 
user19161
6:33 PM
I am especially sick of the people around me. And I have been abused by many people in this life.
 
user19161
One thing most people lack is...empathy.
 
@WillHunting They are not worthy, so don't give them the attention they do not deserve.
 
@WillHunting Learn to ignore. If you don't, you're gonna kill yourself.
 
@WillHunting In other words "grow-up."
 
@JohnJunior Practice what you preach! 8-).
 
user19161
6:39 PM
I am not sure what this question is anymore! math.stackexchange.com/questions/198641/…
 
user19161
It is a disaster even after edits.
 
user19161
There are at least three different intentions in there.
 
@JonasTeuwen Preach what you practice! 8-)
 
@JohnJunior So I should tell people to talk shit...?
Why?!
 
user19161
Oh, I realized that after I reached 2k, the system no longer prompts me to comment when I downvote!
 
6:41 PM
@JonasTeuwen I didn't mean it personally :)
I was just playing with words.
 
@JohnJunior Neither do I.
 
user19161
Have any of you read any LaTeX book? Not tutorial, a real book.
 
user19161
I am looking at the LaTeX books on Amazon.
 
user19161
I guess the two best choices seem to be Kopka and Gratzer.
 
user19161
But I think LaTeX 3 will be out in a couple of years, so maybe I will postpone getting any book now even though it will still be mostly relevant.
 
6:47 PM
@WillHunting I answered that one!
 
@WillHunting Don't get a book for bloody software, just start typing!
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Yeah. I don't understand why people are doing analysis when they don't even know induction.
 
If you wonder "could this be done easier" start running Google.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Yeah I know you would say that!
 
user19161
It is quite weird that I see questions asking very basic things when the asker seems to be doing a way more advanced course.
 
user19161
6:49 PM
They are trying to fly before being able to walk.
 
@WillHunting Ask the easy questions.
 
@WillHunting Bitches be crazy.
 
Perhaps they only figure out they don't know this by trying to answer harder questions: good learning process.
@WillHunting YES! DO IT! TYPE SOMETHING.
Something you know already. Or would like to know, make your own notes - in LaTeX.
And google for answers.
Okay, I need a beer, see you guys!
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen OK, have a BIG one!
 
@JonasTeuwen I'm beginning to think you have a drinking problem.
Or maybe I have one.
I drink too little!
 
user19161
6:51 PM
@PeterTamaroff beginning
 
@PeterTamaroff I have a drinking problem now.
As there is no beer, that is why I am going. Get it? Good.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff I drink almost none. I have tea.
 
@WillHunting Well, you're a Singaporean. Only the Devil knows what you drink.
Has anyone used Google's Goggles?
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Nope.
 
user19161
Even my swimming goggles don't work too well.
 
6:55 PM
@WillHunting You take a pic of something and Google searches for matches of it, like brands and similar stuff.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Oh, google search by image, I know about it.
 
user19161
@spareoom I see you are in this room too!
 
It's a total accident. I wondered where the ping came from.
 
@WillHunting Go to the google image search page and click on the "camera" beside the search space.
 
@WillHunting As I clicked the EL&U when I signed in, someone here talked just as I clicked, so I ended up here and apparently forgot to leave.
 
user19161
7:00 PM
@SpareOom Oh, OK. Back to the other room then.
 
user19161
@JohnJunior Technology is so advanced. I wonder what mathematics is involved in this.
 
user19161
Definitely heavy analysis.
 
@WillHunting Face/pattern recognition?
 
@JohnJunior I use the camera of my phone!
 
user19161
@JohnJunior Yes.
 
7:04 PM
@WillHunting Yes, vectorized images and stuff
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff My phone has no camera!
 
Database searches.
 
They even have tune recognition now...
 
@JohnJunior Sony Ericsson had that way back
 
user19161
@JohnJunior have
 
7:07 PM
^too late, I beat you to it :)
 
user19161
Next time, Junior!
 
Keep trying :-D
 
user19161
Now we sound like Indiana Jones!
 
In the Temple of Doom?
 
user19161
Well, the pop is always calling the son Junior.
 
7:09 PM
Later pop ;-)
 
leo
some help on:
15 hours ago, by leo
I've proved that given an open bounded set $A$, there exist a function $f:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ such that $f$ is $C^\infty$ and is positive over $A$. So I've tried take $g:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ of class $C^\infty$, positive over $U\setminus K$ which is open (and bounded without loose) and then consider $f=\chi_K+g$. This function is identicaly $1$ over $K$, but it can fail to be $C^\infty$
I'm stuck
 
@leo I saw this today. It's beyond my ken!
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff thanks man!
no problem
I guess @robjohn have some experience on it
 
@leo But, what is the original problem, what are you trying to accomplish?
 
leo
16 hours ago, by leo
Given a compact set $K$ of $\Bbb R^n$ and an open nhbhd $U$ of $K$, I'm trying to prove that there is a $C^\infty$ function $f:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ so that $f_{|K}\equiv 1$ and the support of $f$ is contained in $U$.
 
7:20 PM
@leo =P OK.....!
@leo The support of $f$ is $\{x:f(x)\neq 0\}$. OK
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff yes
 
@leo And you not the restriction of $f$ to $K$ by $f_{\mid K}$?
I usually use $f\mid K$
 
leo
some authors says that the support is the closure of the above set
@PeterTamaroff right
 
@leo Did I tell you I refubrished my version of Calculus of Tom Apostol?
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff como?
 
7:25 PM
@leo refubrished = refaccionar
(O algo asi)
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff ahhhh, no
@PeterTamaroff how it looks?
 
@leo just a sec =)
@leo Hmmm things are slow...
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff it looks nice!
 
@leo Yes, I had the title and stuff printed in gold (I didn't know it was actual gold till I got it). I really wanted it not to wear away.
that one is nicer.
 
leo
yes indeed
 
7:32 PM
@leo I need to get a better hold of what uniform contiunity is
 
@PeterTamaroff Would you recommend Apostol in preperation for Spivak
 
@JohnJunior Both are "advanced" calculus texts, I guess. I like them both.,
When I say "advanced" I just mean they are very rigorous, and particularily, Spivak has very challenging exercises. Spivak is a little more "user friendly", IMO.
And he made me laugh once or twice!
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff there is a book of Spivak where his hint to one of the exercises is Sugerencia: hay una forma fácil de hacerlo.
 
@leo LOL Really, Spivak?
 
translation please
 
leo
7:42 PM
@PeterTamaroff yep. I don't remember which book. Calculus or Calculus on Manifolds
 
@leo I remember one when he says something like: "Si se esta tardando demasiado en resolverlo, algo esta mal." o "Dése una demostracion de una línea".
@JohnJunior "Hint There is an easy way to solve it."
 
@PeterTamaroff Thanks :)
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff yes, things like that. "only if absolutely necessary, use exercise XX"
 
@leo This one is priceless:
 
What language was Spivak originally written in?
 
7:47 PM
@JohnJunior English.
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff ja ja yes
 
"En adelante ya no habra mas mentiras."
@leo conoces la identidad de Boya?
 
@leo Urysohn's lemma allows you to construct a continuous function with your requirements under a locally-compact Hausdorff space. I wonder if its proof can be amended to produce a $C^\infty$ function in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
 
$$2\pi = {e^\gamma }\prod\limits_{n = 2}^\infty {\exp \left( {\frac{{\zeta \left( n \right)}}{n+1 \choose 2}} \right)} $$
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff algo con factoriales
 
7:53 PM
@leo Es esa de ahi!
@AymanHourieh Hey. I wonder if you can help me grokke uniform continuity.
 
@PeterTamaroff Hello! Nice book you have there.
Sure.
 
leo
@AymanHourieh I think the objective of the exercise is not to appeal to Urysohn's Lemma. I almost finishing it. It is a quite long exercise. All start with bump functions
 
@leo You're finishing? Good!
@AymanHourieh Yes. A nice lady refubrished it.
 
leo
@PeterTamaroff only that part is left
 
@PeterTamaroff So what about uniform continuity?
 
leo
7:59 PM
@PeterTamaroff Profesor Boya was in here teaching some courses
past year he teach Álgebra Lineal I
creo
 
@AymanHourieh Well. I know the definition allright, and can apply it. But I want to understand in less technical terms what it means.
The idea is that there is a threshold $\delta$
And whenever $x$ and $y$ are withing that threshold, then $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ will be $\epsilon$ close.
And $\delta$ works for any pair $x,y$ of the interval $A$ where $f$ is UC, right?
(for a given $\epsilon$)
 
Have you studied sequences and series of functions? The power of uniform convergence is evident there as it ensures that properties like continuity and integrability are preserved by the limits of sequences and series of functions.
 
@AymanHourieh Yes, I've studied that. A while ago though. But I'm talking about uniform continuity, though.
 
Ah, sorry. Should have read that more carefully. Yes, your understanding is correct.
 
@AymanHourieh So the idea is that if $y$ is in a $\delta$ nbhd of $x$ (or conversely) $f(y)$ will be in a $\epsilon$ nbhd of $f(x)$.
 
hhh
8:07 PM
Good LaTex command to make an Alert! -notice?
 
@AymanHourieh Now, I want to prove $x\sin x$ is not UC on $\mathbb R^+$
@hhh ??
 
hhh
@PeterTamaroff I want to just stress some writing out of the other writing somehow...
 
@hhh Oh, you're asking a question!
"What is a good LaTeX command to make an Alert! notice?"
 
hhh
@PeterTamaroff Yes :)
(for writing math so hence here)
 
@leo Alguna vez oiste de "casi cotas superiores"? Supongo que Spivak esta tratando de $\limsup$ y $\liminf$ pero con palabras extrañas. =P
 
8:15 PM
@PeterTamaroff Intuitively speaking, as the value of $x$ increases, the graph of $x \sin(x)$ becomes more spread out vertically. So no matter what $\delta$ you choose, you can shift the interval on the $x$ axis unit you find values $x$, $y$ within $\delta$, but their images aren't within a fixed $\epsilon$.
Does it make sense?
 
@AymanHourieh Oh, yes.
 
@PeterTamaroff A rigorous proof isn't very different from what I said above. Just try adding $2\pi k$ to $x$, $y$ and see what happens to $|f(x) - f(y)|$ while $|x - y|$ stays the same.
 
@JonasTeuwen
@AymanHourieh So basically no $\delta$ will work for any given $\epsilon$ (it seems)
 
@PeterTamaroff Indeed. You can always add enough $2 \pi k$ to $x$, $y$ preserving $|x - y|$ but making $|f(x) - f(y)|$ as large as you want.
 
@AymanHourieh Sweet.
I'll finish the proof, then!
 
8:26 PM
@PeterTamaroff Cool!
 
8:36 PM
Hi everyone!
 
@AymanHourieh I think it it'd be wise to choose $x=0$ and $y\in (0,\pi/2)$ and exploit the fact that $x+2\pi n$ will always be a root and $y+2\pi n$ will grow large.
 
@JonasTeuwen
http://www.williamsportmd.gov/images/fireworks4.jpg
 
Then I can keep $|x-y|<\pi /2$ but make $f(x)_f(y)$ really large.
 
@PeterTamaroff Hi Pedro!I was eating something and remered you
 
@MeAndMath That sounds creepy! Do I look edible?
 
8:39 PM
@PeterTamaroff It was dulce de leche
 
@MeAndMath Hehehe with what did you have it?
 
@PeterTamaroff cheese
 
@PeterTamaroff white cheese with no salt
 
@MeAndMath Oh, that's better.
 
8:41 PM
@PeterTamaroff It does simplify the proof. Yes.
 
@AymanHourieh So, to disprove UC I have to find one $\epsilon>0$ such that for no $\delta >0$ will $|x-y|<\delta$ imply $|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$, for some (fixed) $x$ and some (fixed) $y$?
 
@GustavoBandeira
 
Does anyone have any silly ways to write the number $2$ in mathematical terms? (Like $\dim(\mathbb{P}_1)$, $[\mathbb{C}:\mathbb{R}]$, $|\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}|$...)
 
@PeterTamaroff Exactly.
 
@leo What is the question?
 
8:53 PM
@PeterTamaroff What you wrote is the logical negation of the definition of UC.
 
@Gustavo "when I came to this world,I couldn't remember anything.Today I'm Gabriela,Gabriela I am...I was born so I grew so,And I'm still, I'll always be like this:
Gabriela, Gabriela always!"
 
@yunone $\{x:x\text{ is prime and } x \text{ is even}\}$?
 
@PeterTamaroff Thanks, that's another good one.
 
leo
2 hours ago, by leo
16 hours ago, by leo
Given a compact set $K$ of $\Bbb R^n$ and an open nhbhd $U$ of $K$, I'm trying to prove that there is a $C^\infty$ function $f:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ so that $f_{|K}\equiv 1$ and the support of $f$ is contained in $U$.
2 hours ago, by leo
15 hours ago, by leo
I've proved that given an open bounded set $A$, there exist a function $f:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ such that $f$ is $C^\infty$ and is positive over $A$. So I've tried take $g:\Bbb R^n\to \Bbb R$ of class $C^\infty$, positive over $U\setminus K$ which is open (and bounded without loose) and then consider $f=\chi_K+g$. This function is identicaly $1$ over $K$, but it can fail to be $C^\infty$
 
@yunone Any birthday coming soon?
 
leo
8:55 PM
@robjohn I think the idea is prove this without using Urysohn
 
@leo Actually, you need to prove the $C^\infty$ version of Urysohn... not too hard.
 
@PeterTamaroff Ha, nope. I have a friend named Thu (pronounced "two") and I like to refer to her as these in written correspondence (fb, texts, etc.)
 
leo
@robjohn so that's what I am trying to do. In $\Bbb R^n$
 
@robjohn Saying "not too hard." is psychological assault!
 
@leo Show that the distance from $K$ to $U^C$ is positive...
 
leo
8:57 PM
@robjohn no it can be $0$
 
@leo Remember that $K$ is compact...
 
leo
my bad. No to $U^c$ yes it is
 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

« first day (776 days earlier)      last day (4236 days later) »