« first day (4345 days earlier)      last day (667 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 23:00

12:00 AM
@TedShifrin True!! Let me show you one me and a friend were drawing back at uni
 
So, Kirby "calculus"… When do I start taking derivatives
/s
(weird Internet lag issues, didn't mean to post twice)
 
Same! I think something happened to the chat
 
It's similarly disappointing that in the lambda calculus you can't write $d/d\lambda$
@BalarkaSen Weird
 
John Harer and a few other Kirby students tried to teach me the stuff over beers and pretzels.
 
I swear I drew it in colors...
 
12:05 AM
I only see some horrid pink that looks off-white.
 
That sure looks like a tough tangle
 
Not sure how the camera did that
@TedShifrin Same guy as Harer stability, I assume?
 
Yup.
 
Cool.
 
@TedShifrin But as you bit into the pretzel, you realized to your horror that its inside was attached in a nontrivial way to its outside, and the pretzel represented a topological defect of the universe
Surgery pretzel
 
12:12 AM
I wanted to make a joke about pretzels and knots, but couldn't find it.
@Akiva I was asked to prove that $\Bbb{RP}^2 \# \Bbb{RP}^2 \# \Bbb{RP}^2$ is homeomorphic to $T^2 \# \Bbb{RP}^2$ in my graduate topology exam, and I gave a 2D Kirby calculus proof
 
i knew a kirby student who tried to explain that to me once. didn't work.
this is why every social circle needs to include at least one 3-manifolds person.
 
lol
3 is a weird little dimension
its so different from 2 or 4
 
@BalarkaSen Cool!
I woulda done some standard-ish cut-and-paste proof
 
Because 2 and 4 are, ironically, less complex? 🤷‍♂️😻
 
12:17 AM
lol
@AkivaWeinberger I can never remember the polygon one.
There's some tricky cuts to be made that I can't figure out
(incidentally, note that above I have nonorientable 1-handles as well. The analogue in 4D is that there are "twisted" 2-handles, and instead of a $\Bbb Z/2$'s worth of choice of being orientable or not as in 2D, there is now a $\Bbb Z$'s worth of choice for being twisty, i.e., there is a "twisty number" (official name) associated to every 2-handle which is an integer)
 
Wild
I guess it corresponds to other slopes of surgeries?
 
Yes, but only integer slopes.
You're a 3-manifold thinker, it's making me depressed.
Soon you'll be hyperbolizing knot complements
The way I think about it is that there are two real line bundles over the circle, hence $\Bbb Z/2$ is where the twisty number in 2D belongs. Likewise, there are integer many complex line bundles on the sphere $S^2$, hence $\Bbb Z$ is where the twisty number in 4D belongs.
(complex line bundle is the same as an oriented real rank 2 bundle by the way, so you can just think latter)
 
12:33 AM
So one of these would be the tangent bundle?
 
I prefer complex line bundle, thank you.
Euler, DogAteMy
 
What about him
 
Euler class of bundle generalizes Euler characteristic (=Euler number of tangent bundle)
Did you learn intersection numbers?
@BalarkaSen Is this a frame job?
 
12:53 AM
@TedShifrin Don't think so
Fun fact: you can compute a 3x3 determinant using only 8 multiplications instead of the naïve 9
(more additions, but additions are free)
@BalarkaSen Did you ever put more thought into the "two arcs equal three arcs" thing?
 
1:17 AM
Time to read through Guillemin & Pollack, DogAteMy. Or Hirsch.
 
 
2 hours later…
Bob
2:56 AM
good evening
 
hello
 
Bob
How are you tonight copper.hat? You have a PhD in physics right?
 
3:19 AM
@Bob nope, eecs
 
I'm back!..............I think.........🤔
 
Were you kidnapped?
 
3:34 AM
Nah....I went through a mini-midlife mathematical identity crisis....I was doing a problem in Insel a few weeks ago and I just got frustrated beyond belief. It was a multi-step proof where I would have to use result 1 --> result 2 --> result 3 --> etc. I was trying my hardest to do it without looking at any solution. I got partially there, but not far enough to my satisfaction..... So I went into a spiral of questioning what I'm doing with myself, etc , etc.
 
what is "Insel"?
 
I call it "mini" because I was doing everything else in my life with no problems (gym, social activitvies, etc), but my math fire was completely extinguished..
 
Friedberg, Insel
and Spence
 
Insel, Friedberg, et al - Linear ALgebra
 
@Koro ah thanks! i was thinking a geographical location
 
3:36 AM
I suppose I was being hard on myself because I could "recognize" what was needed to do the proof, but I suppose it was just an accumulation of not being where I "envisioned" myself at this point in my life.
 
@D.C.theIII for me it is like a bicycle tyre with a slow leak. if i don't top up regularly then there is (yet another) long refresh cycle somewhere in the future.
 
I think I should be good about not needing to refresh much. My mind was just recalling all the results I've worked on up to this point, actually more than I had expected. I just didn't want to get in the "grind"
 
i remember the broad ideas, but need to refresh details.
 
It was never an issue of completely dropping things, I love the "art" too much. But I guess I needed to refocus and remember my reasons for doing this.
 
my brain can really only handle one area at a time. so if i am solving a coding problem, my vestigial mathematics skills evaporate.
 
3:40 AM
but remembering the broad ideas is what matters no? The details one can always retrieve.
 
Copper’s brain needs an external hard drive
 
overflowing with data.
was also doing a bit of cycling. which copper might like alot
 
I would think Shifrin has frustrated you more than Insel. For whatever it’s worth.
 
Actually no, cause with Shifrin I can "see" how it is going to be useful. Insel, I needed to take some time to see how it will be applied. I know Linear Algebra is a foundational structure for everything, but sometimes getting caught up in the abstract minutiae I lost sight of it.
 
i like cycling trails. and yes, i wish i could plug in an external drive :-)
 
3:54 AM
:(
I recently appeared in an interview for admission to the college I want to go to. I'm awaiting the result and am not sure if I'll get in.
 
Well you've made it to the interview stage so congrats on that. Is that a mandatory stage or is it done only for candidates on the cusp?
 
about 50% of the candidates are to be selected for admission based on marks in paper 1, paper 2 and interview.
 
ah...you'll be alright. At least from what you've displayed here you have a good grasp of things. At least with my limited knowledge...
 
They asked me 3 questions from linear algebra, 2 from analysis.
 
what did they ask? Did they ask how you woud "solve" these extremely hard questions and you have to provide a thought process? Maybe not have the solution but walk them through what you would do?
 
4:05 AM
I answered them but I believe that I was not 'fast' in answering.
the question 1) given n dim. vector space V and its subspace W of dim k, does there exist a linear map f from V to R such that that f(W)=0 but f is not a zero map?
I answered that. Take a basis of W and then extend it to a basis of V. Let $w_1,w_2,...,w_k, v_1,...,v_{n-k}$ Define f to be 0 on every basis vector of V except at $v_1$, where f is to be defined as $f(v_1)=1$.
 
as long as $k<n$.
 
I think they intended that W is a subspace (proper).
as they were happy with the answer.
 
How were the analysis questions?
 
Then there were two more questions based on this one. One was if set of all such f's is a vector space or not. First I answered No but then I immediately said yes and gave explanation.
The third was finding dim. of that subspace. I answered that.
Then came the analysis question. I was given an n dimensional inner product space V.
They asked how that can be made a metric space. I answered that.
inner product comes with a norm and norm can induce a metric etc.
Then, another question: If W is a subspace of V such that W is open in V, then show that W=V.
 
I think you're fine and should get in. When do you find out?
 
4:17 AM
best of luck.
 
To that, I said,"0 is in W and since W is open, there is a ball of radius r>0 centered at 0 i.e., B(0,r) that lies completely in W. And if v lies in B(0,r) then every scalar multiple of v lies in W as W is a subspace. I just have to formalize this now."
 
that is almost formalised. If $v \in V$ then ${r \over 2\|v\|} v \in B(0,r)$ so you are finished.
 
Then while writing it down- I got stuck! :( So I said," Sir, I think it'll take me some time solve this one." They said -you just solved it when you said (my last comment). But still I was stuck. Then they asked-write out B(0,r).
I did that and then I realized what I was missing and copper I wrote exactly what you have written.
 
excellent.
 
Since they said V is finite dimensional, I said if v_i is a basis vector of V then $r/2 v/||v||$ will lie in the ball and hence v lies in W (subspace).
and thus concluded.
they said -good.
Then they said -Ok, your interview is over. But [my name] , tell me why was finite dimensionality of V required?
I immediately realized that finite dimensionality of V was not required at all.
I said -it was given in the question so I thought I should use it.
Ok (or something similar in a positive way, I think), they said.
@D.C.theIII The date is not revealed.
 
4:26 AM
Too much linear algebra for me.
 
I have been refreshing the website page every now and then. I have one tab open in laptop and on phone all the time.
@TedShifrin I think it was a terrible interview as I got stuck in the last one even after saying out loud the strategy to solve the question.
 
I’m surprised they didn’t ask if every subspace is closed.
 
I myself said the strategy to solve the question but I got stuck while writing it out. :(
 
Everyone has little flubs, Koro.
 
Too much linear algebra in the interview Ted?
 
4:29 AM
The analysis was not really much analysis. So very unbalanced according to my view of mathematics.
 
I don't know why I got stuck there. I think I knew the answer deep down but I could not write it. I don't know why that happened.
 
So you present proofs at the black/whiteboard?
 
yes, at the whiteboard.
it was half an hour interview.
My interview was the last interview.
I think that for some people, it was around 40 mins.
 
This is for undergrad or for graduate?
 
for admission to a graduate program
 
4:34 AM
OK
 
for admission to undergrad, is open set asked somewhere?
 
it would be a little unusual to assume knowledge of any point set topology for admissions to an undergrad program in pure math
that being said I wouldnt be surprised if at some fancy universities they may see if you happen to know something like that just for fun
 
I have no experience with interviews for admission at any level. But open sets in a metric space are hardly point set topology.
 
thats fair enough, I thought 'open set' here meant in the most general set
i.e. assuming some high school student knows the definition of a topological space
that I would say is 'clearly' unusual but I may be wrong
(because it doesnt seem necessary to do well in a undergrad program to know this already)
 
Balarka may have known that in their highschool.
 
4:46 AM
which is fine, but in an interview they want to make sure you wouldnt clearly drop out of the course/fail hard fast
at the grad level of course the standards would be higher, its not enough for them to see you wouldn't fail immediately, lol
 
@copper.hat thanks for wishing me luck. :-)
 
:-)
 
@D.C.theIII Another thing that comes to my mind is: I understand that other interviewees came straight from college (that is, immediately after completing their undergraduation in Maths). But I completed my UG in 2018 and that too in engineering.
So how about their interview? It seems that it would surely be better than howsoever mine was.
 
I see, but you've done work to bring yourself up to par. You can only worry about what you have control over. You did your part in the interview, now just have to wait.
 
for what its worth, doesnt sound like your interview went badly , anyway no point worrying about it now
 
4:57 AM
I want to know from your experience-what would be a bad interview then?
1) Not knowing the strategy to solve a problem and getting stuck from the start of the problem.
2) Knowing the strategy to solve a problem but still getting stuck while writing it out.
In case of 1), they will give some hints, which I believe interviewee will build upon to get to the complete solution.
Same is true for 2). So 1) and 2) are the same. So 'taking hints in an interview' is bad?
 
nothing you can do now except wait. learn from the past but do not dwell.
 
5:17 AM
thanks @copper.hat @D.C.theIII @porridgemathematics :-)
 
i think i've said this before. some of the interviews that i thought went the 'worst', in my career, ended up leading to good places. and sometimes a good feeling after an interview is just a vibe and not meaningful.
 
i generally know in an interview how it went.
 
i tend to feel the same way, unless the interviewer is extremely opaque
 
doing psqs to maintain my user deleted & downvotes rep, i'll never get the jump suit at this rate
 
which happens from time to time
 
5:26 AM
i had one interview that went great until near the end.
i asked a little about the interviewer and it turned out that i knew his advisor very well, the interview basically stopped there.
 
wrong handshake?
ah.
 
i don't know what the issue was really. maybe it disturbed the 'i'm your boss' perspective.
experience has its downsides
 
most likely did, maybe he thought it was too incestuous to hire you
 
a lesson in sales is when you hit the crucial point just shut up.
which can be pretty difficult for me :-)
 
lol, I feel like that could be a lesson in life too
I have some friends who behave like salesmen 24/7
like, with opinions..
 
5:50 AM
don't you just hate that? it's good we have lesliecoin, a stable cryptocurrency to rely upon. instead of our no-good friends.
 
6:08 AM
at least you stopped at the crucial point
 
 
1 hour later…
7:23 AM
Can maybe someone help me here math.stackexchange.com/questions/4481249/…
 
8:16 AM
Good morning.
@Wave, you need to remove the 0 from your radius, since by theorem it is not included
In addition, i do not understand how you are plotting a function of two arguments on two d space.
Also try writing $e^{i\phi \alpha}$ using eulers theorem in Sine and cosine and check for the sign
 
 
2 hours later…
10:32 AM
A monoid is usually defined with an inner operation, is there a name for an object that is similiar to a monoid, but with an outer operation?
IE fullfils associative properities, the existence of 1 element.
We can say a vector space is a set and two operations, one of them build an abelian group, i was thinking if we can say something elegantly similiar to the other set of operations. such as the set adn the multiplication are a commutative outer monoid with distrubutive properities
 
 
1 hour later…
12:42 PM
this definition of stochastic boundess is incorrect isn't it?
https://imgur.com/a/klycTv5

the M should be kept constant and n should go to inf, right?
 
12:52 PM
@Koro Here’s a nice generalization: suppose $E$ is a Banach space and $F$ a subspace of $E$ which has the Baire property and is not meager. Then $E=F$.
(The point is that this already implies that $F$ is open)
 
 
1 hour later…
2:05 PM
@MadSpaces what's an outer operation? And how would you make a theory of them
 
2:41 PM
I am roughly translating, inner operations are operations acting on the set and go to the set itself, such as the ones defined on groups and monoids, an outer operation is for example scalar multiplication, where you are taking an element that is not in the set (fore xample from the field not the vector space) and going into the vector space
 
3:06 PM
So you want a monoid action on some set?
 
I am just asking for a nice naming
since i would like to say "a vector space is a set with an operation that creates an abelian group and another operation that makes ".........naming here "
 
A vector space is an Abelian group with a ring action of a field by endomorphisms
 
3:23 PM
@JoeShmo Did you ever do this?
 
for a braid on n strands if you further identify the two sets of distinguished points on the parallel planes P_0 and P_1 to become just two distinguished points say a and b, then you lose the permutation structure?
 
3:49 PM
Hello
 
Hello
 
I am trying to obtain outage probability for the given expression but not getting it clearly.

$P_o = \text{Pr}\biggl(XY \leq \frac{\gamma_t(\mu_3Z+\mu_4)}{\zeta-\frac{\gamma_t \mu_1}{Y}-\frac{\gamma_t \mu_2}{X}}\biggr)$, where $X,Y,Z$ are independent exponential random variables having CDF $F_X(x), F_Y(y), F_Z(z)$ and PDF $f_X(x), f_Y(y), f_Z(z)$ and all other things are constant.
Any logic to solve this problem would be highly appreciated.
 
4:23 PM
On pascal triangle does it hold that sum followed by differenece of a row is equal to 0. For example in the row "1 4 6 4 1" it holds that 1-4+6-4+1=0, is this true of all rows?
 
@AkivaWeinberger yes, I sent him an email. Still waiting for him to get back to me.
 
4:42 PM
Hi
 
Hi!
 
violet: yes consider the binomial expansion of (1 - 1)^n
 
Today the results came out. And I am happy to inform that I am in the merit list :-)
 
and ignore the first row, where there's no alternating anything to sum up
 
Finally I'll join my dream college for masters :-)
 
4:44 PM
koro: does that mean accepted?
 
I got one -10 because serial upvote was removed. Which is curious, because if it was a serial upvote, surely in the vernacular, serial implies more than one?
 
good job @Koro !
 
oh, cool. congrats
 
@leslietownes yes :-)
 
what college is that
 
4:44 PM
Congrats @Koro well done
remember me when you are head of tata
 
hah
 
Thanks a lot @leslietownes @copper.hat @robjohn @TedShifrin and the others for guiding me :-)
I have also submitted my resignation today to the company I'm employed at.
:-)
 
Congrats, Koro. On both counts! Now the serious work begins :D
I got -60 or -70 for correction of serial voting, @copper.
 
Thanks a lot dear professor @Ted.
@TedShifrin me -20 today.
 
@TedShifrin that makes sense, at least serial implies a sequence of prior upvotes. But -10 implies a single vote, hardly a pattern.
It just amuses me, other than interfering with my jumpsuit progress.
 
4:54 PM
copper: same happened to me. what about my jumpsuit progress?
i'm beginning to think i'll never hit 100k
this is why i'm grateful for lesliecoin, where i have well over 100k, and the indelible blockchain ensures that all transactions are irreversible
 
:-)
 
I still have the empty jumpsuit.
And no lesliecoin.
 
If $\mathcal{M}$ is a family of $w(F, E)$-bounded subsets of $F$, and we create local base for $E$ by taking finite intersections of multiples of the sets $M^\circ$ with $M\in \mathcal{M}$, where $M^\circ$ denotes the (real) polar of $M$, then why is the multiplication continuous?
(E, F) here is a dual pair (in the sense that elements of F separate elements of E, and conversely)
I get stuck in trying to bound $\text{Re} \langle tsz, m\rangle$ where $z\in M^\circ$, $t > 0$ and $s\in B(r, a)$ where $a> 0$
If M were to be absorbing, then I think I'd know how to finish this, but here I'm clueless
The only thing that I can change here is t and a, and the bound is supposed to be independend of m (so I'm trying to bound the supremum over all of m)
 
5:25 PM
Stupid question incoming
So as i undertsand, the definiteness of a bilinear form is dependendent on the choice of basis. Why does this attribute then matter, if it is not globaly inherited?
 
the notion can be phrased in ways that look basis dependent, but the notion is not basis dependent
which hopefully answers the second question. this is not a stupid question, btw
 
What do you mean the notation can be phrased .. can you clarify.
 
the notion. typo.
 
@MadSpaces it i like determinant of a linear map
 
a bilinear form either is or isn't definite. independent of basis.
some of the ways of characterizing definiteness do make use of bases, but the end result does not depend on them
 
5:29 PM
The determinant is not dependendent on choice of basis. well maybe it changes orientation
 
neither is definiteness
 
people often do care about particular bases, also, because e.g. diagonalizing the form can make calculations easier. i wouldn't say that bases 'don't matter' for purposes of thinking about bilinear forms
 
I do not seem to understand, like i have a question infront of my eyes, where it states, find basis such that the bilinear form is once = 0 once positive definit once negative, so i am not sure i understand what you mean, it is not dependent on basis choice
 
maybe include the question verbatim
 
But it is not about the question per se.
It is more about, if i can find basis, where i can change the definitness. why do we bother?
Am i being stupid
 
5:31 PM
well, you can't, which is why it might help to include this question verbatim
so people can figure out what it's really asking, or if it's wrong
it very much is about this question per se if it's telling you that definiteness is basis-dependent
 
So are you saying, that a bilinar form, has an intrinsic definiteness. but it is not examanable given a certain base, since another base could give you a different one?
 
no, not at all
you can use a basis to compute stuff relating to a bilinear form
one of those things being whether it is definite or not
this doesn't mean that the result depends on the basis. it doesn't.
 
why don't you post the question otherwise this is just going to be another loop
 
you keep saying that it does, and i can't tell if that's because you have some independent reason for thinking this, or if it's just some (as yet unstated) question that's raising this confusion
 
Well.. Honestly because i have to go catch a bus in 5 minutes
 
5:34 PM
include it when you get back :)
 
lol
Yea, i am going to straight into bed. so i guess tomorrow.
 
Give the definition of definiteness, too.
 
But thanks for the try, i will mark you when i write it
 
ted's suggestion is, as always, a good one. as i mentioned above, you can certainly define definiteness in a way that makes it appear as though it might depend on a choice of basis. but this doesn't mean that definiteness does depend on the choice of basis.
like determinants in coppers example
 
I don't think anyone will help me. I guess I'll just be stuck like always
In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics a polar topology, topology of G {\displaystyle {\mathcal {G}}} -convergence or topology of uniform convergence on the sets of G {\displaystyle {\mathcal {G}}} is a method to define locally convex topologies on the vector spaces of a pairing. == Preliminaries == A pairing is a triple ( X , Y , b )...
I need something like this but instead of absolute polars, I am working with real polars
 
5:50 PM
I'm not being rude, @Jakobian. I understand very little of what you typed.
 
what's up with 'serial voting was reversed'?
There is a topology in which Q is not open but the set of irrationals is open 😮😮
 
Think of $\Bbb Q$ as $\Bbb Z$.
It is far from the order topology. I have never thought about this before.
 
6:05 PM
Or I consider R and $U\subset R$ to be open if $U=\emptyset$ or $R\setminus U$ is countable. Then the set of all such U's gives me the topology on R.
 
@Koro It is likely related to the following:
94
Q: Upcoming cleanup of duplicated votes

Yaakov EllisIt was reported on MSO that it is possible for a user to upvote or downvote more than once on a single post (resulting in reputation changes for the author for each vote). After some data examination, we were able to confirm that this vulnerability exists (it is happening due to race conditions s...

(though it needn't be---it could also be that you had a fan / enemy whose votes have been overturned).
 
“Race conditions” sounds particularly bad these days.
@Koro So any countable set of irrationals is closed.
 
I have not yet studied closed sets in general topology :(
but I believe that would be complement of open sets
as in metric space topology
 
Yes, that’s a proposition, not a definition.
 
6:13 PM
Oh
The definition would involve limit points?
 
Hrm? How do you define closed sets in general topology?
 
The way Munkres does.
Yes, Koro.
 
I came across Furstenberg's proof of infinitude of primes. In the proof, closed sets were used.
 
@TedShifrin I dare you to guess my next question
 
Right. That’s sorta famous, Koro.
 
6:16 PM
@Koro If you're free to choose any topology you want on the reals, all that matters is cardinality, so it's just about getting an uncountable space with a nonopen countable subset with open complement
@TedShifrin How does Munkres define them
 
Actually, I was wrong. Haven’t taught topology in 20 years. My book used what I said. Munkres used what DogAteMy wants.
 
Oh, with limit points. I missed that
 
My book uses a sequential statement, because that’s useful for the analysis in $\Bbb R^n$.
 
Is that even valid in general topology?
 
No, of course not. Containing limit points is, though.
 
6:20 PM
$A'\subseteq A$? Yes, of course
 
@Jakobian I assumed the "sequential statement" was "a set is closed iff it contains all limits of sequences in the set"
which in fact fails for the cocountable topology
 
That one is not true in general, but it's true if we replace the word "sequence" with "net"
 
@AlessandroCodenotti Thanks for the comment. I don't yet know Banach spaces :(
 
A Banach space is a (usually infinite-dimensional) vector space with a norm, which is complete as a metric space with respect to that norm
 
6:26 PM
I had my pedagogical reasons for multivariable analysis, of course.
 
@AkivaWeinberger doesn't every vector space have a norm?
 
An example is the set of all infinite sequences of real numbers $(a_n)_n$ such that $\sum|a_n|$ converges. With the norm $\|a\|=\sum|a_n|$, this is called $\ell^1$
@Koro The norm is part of the data of the Banach space
 
hmm, I'm not yet sure if all infinite dimensional vector spaces have norms.
 
You choose the norm
@Koro I think you can show this using Hamel bases (and the axiom of choice)
 
For finite dim., there are basis vectors which can create orthogonal basis using Gram Schmidt.
 
6:30 PM
@Koro Every vector space admits some norm, but it's not "part of the data" of a vector space
 
Another example is, in general, you can have all infinite sequences where $\sum|a_n|^p$ converges. This is a metric space as long as $p>1$. This is called $\ell^p$ space
Wait
The norm is $(\sum|a_n|^p)^{1/p}$
Yeah
 
@Koro Sure, if $(x_i)$ is a Hamel basis, then define $\|\sum a_ix_i\| = \sum |a_i|$
 
There's also $\ell^\infty$ where the norm is $\sup|a_n|$. This is the limit of the $\ell^p$ norm as $p\to\infty$ (note that if $p<q$ then $\ell^p\supset\ell^q$)
$\ell^2$ is special 'cause you can also give it an inner product
 
@AkivaWeinberger ah yes. I know that space :). We have Minkowski inequality also in this space.
 
@Koro The Minkowski inequality is precisely the statement that $\ell^p$ is a metric space, yeah
 
6:33 PM
Iirc $l^p$ is equivalent to a Hilbert space iff $p = 2$
 
I think I said the following thoughtlessly
 
Hilbert spaces are Banach spaces with inner products (that agree with the norm)
 
5 mins ago, by Koro
For finite dim., there are basis vectors which can create orthogonal basis using Gram Schmidt.
 
Well, that's kind of obvious looking at the duals of those spaces
 
I should know for my statement to be valid: "Every finite vector space has an inner product."
 
6:35 PM
Yes
Over $\Bbb C$ or $\Bbb R$
 
What does that mean though
 
yes over C or R.
 
@Koro However, there are normed finite vector spaces where the norm does not come from an inner product
 
@Jakobian I mean that suppose we have an n dimensional vector space V over F (F is either R or C), can we say that V is an inner product space?
 
Eg $\Bbb R^2$ with the norm $\|(a,b)\|=|a|+|b|$
@Koro Yes, it can be equipped with an inner product
 
6:37 PM
@Koro Uh... kind of not really? Inner product is not part of the "data" for a vector space
 
yes, I think $l^p$ norms with p<1 also doesn't come from inner product.
 
@Koro If p<1 it's not a norm
 
They are quasi-norms
 
@Jakobian Yeah it doesn't have one chosen but you have options
 
@Jakobian yes. I mean -can we define one inner product on V?
 
6:39 PM
@AkivaWeinberger It's always linearly isomorphic to one though
 
@Koro Not uniquely but yes
 
Oh. Is there an obvious one that we can define?
 
the dot product
just choose a basis
 
what if I define <,>: V cross V --> R as <v,u>=0 for every v not equal to u?
@Jakobian and then I declare them to be orthogonal?
 
@AkivaWeinberger it's equivalent to closed for first countable spaces
In general the spaces for which closure=sequential closure are called Frechet-Urysohn
 
6:47 PM
@Koro This is a different question than starting with a norm.
 
I wanted to say -inner product norm following my comment about using Gram Schmidt.
(I may have missed "inner product" and written only 'norm' above.)
 
hello folks
can i say the imaginary number "i" cant be measured and thats the reason why i cant compare two complex numbers and say which one is greater
 
There is length and distance. What does “can be measured” mean?
 
thats a good question
i mean something that isnt just the absolute value from 0 on the argand plane
 
That’s not answering.
 
6:58 PM
ik, but i was under the notion it cant be measured
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 23:00

« first day (4345 days earlier)      last day (667 days later) »