123: remember one thing: moment/torque is defined about a point just as a vector product. You want to know what it means by torque/moment about an axis?
I haven't read it carefully, @Koro, but if you're going to be pedantic, you might as well be pedantic by saying there is $N$ so that blah holds for $n>N$ (etc.). Do we know that $r^{1/n} \to 1$?
@Koro I used to help the OP in that question outside of mse but they reacted a bit oddly when I replied indicating that I will be particularly busy for some period of time and will be slow in responding. So, I don't want to get involved.
I got an email from someone on whose question I'd commented asking me for advice on where to apply to grad school. Agh.
Someone trying to read Griffiths/Harris's algebraic geometry book but not understanding the most basic thing in complex analysis (how you get from holomorphic to analytic).
My whole plane ride I was trying to conceptualize all of the phenomena from how we rise to how the plane is able to stay on path, to anticipating turbulence......
koro: partitions of unity often involve such functions. any time you want to apply a theorem that might only apply on [a,b] to an arbitrary function, you might consider such functions. there is nothing exotic about the notion. sometimes people don't even give it a name.
dc3rd sometimes it is a subset tuned to exactly where the function is nonzero, but more generally "supported on bleh" can mean "identically zero outside of bleh," so yes. it depends on who is writing the definitions.
things that approximate dirac delta in a distributional sense might well be compactly supported. "approximate identities" these families are sometimes called.
This is probably why I haven't fully seen the depth of these objects yet, since I haven't done a measure theoretic level course yet......that's for next fall....
i mean, in one sense it's fine, engineers and such have been using them forever and who cares. but if you get to the point where you're spewing engineering talk on mse, go back and re-evaluate your life choices.
This comes back to our problem with education majors being at the bottom of the heap. And crummy textbooks. But I don't agree that PhD mathematicians should be the arbiters.
koro for fun you might think in the fd case whether you get all conceivable square roots of a positive operator by sprinkling signs down the diagonal of a diagonalization of the operator. (spoiler alert: no)
"The way that many people remember this fact is that the ASS postulate would be the name for a donkey! (ASS) And there is no postulate named after a donkey!"
That, along with the telling apart a magnetized bar and an unmagnetized bar, was given to me by a math friend at a conference zillions of years ago. I was stuck on both for embarrassingly long.
if i had the chocie to go back three years in the past, i would have enrolled myself in the mathematics department instead physics.. completly my mathematical education, and then started physics. i was back then however ignorant and unaware... now i see the light..
Sadly, the world does not see the beuaty of mathematics. i believe studying it has made me a better human, more logical, more compassionate, more critical. etc.
I do not know about that, it surely however happened to me while studying mathematics. the language of it forces one to think logically and connect statements correctly.
Yea i am very intrigued about that why mathematics describe our universe. its so facsinating and wierd :)
But the problem with these questions is that one enters the realm of philosophy and exists the realm of experimental science... hard
So it is obvious philosohpy leads to that, since i think it is very closely intwined in it. (logical thinking)
I like to think about it as follows. if you have any kind of pheonemena.. you can ask "why" n times and stay in the realm of science.. however.. at n+1 "why" you just entered philosophy :=)
For example: why is this body hot? because its temperature is high, why is the temp high? because it was in the sun, why did staying in the sun made it high? because photons dropped on the surface transforming their energy into kinitic enrgy... and soooooo on, at one point you ask, why do atoms jiggle to make heat? ... and then why do atoms exist? and so on. at one point, the question of why. ceases to be answerable withen the realm of science and becomes more philosophical
in the late 2000s they began cramming more tables into the downstairs and ruined it as a place to eat dinner. the upstairs was still OK. i always liked the food.
i tried automating the downloading but it was more work updating the security on my scraper so i just do it manually now.
@dc3rd this is what happens when an engineer learns a little formal mathematics and then tries to solve a simple problem math.stackexchange.com/a/4324036/27978
I disagree with you. Lagrange multipliers is almost always easier than the algebra you get with substituting constraints and eliminating variables.
Proving that you have local/global extrema is not usually taught, although I taught my multivariable students how to approach such things, and the bordered Hessian test for constrained local extrema is an exercise in my book :P
This started off as a bizarre question. (The definition was only included after we pestered the OP.)
@copper Usually a heuristic argument suffices, but one can rig a compact space outside of which the extremum cannot occur and then use the max value theorem. I didn't read what you wrote.
If $V$ is a $2m$-dimensional real inner product space, $Cliff(V)$ apparently has a an irrep in a $2^m$-dimensional complex inner product space. What is this object?
My guess is its probably going to be an exterior algebra. Choose an orthobasis $e_1, \cdots, e_m, f_1, \cdots, f_m$ for $V$. Try $\Lambda^*(e_1 + i f_1, \cdots, e_m + i f_m)$, or something of this sort?
That's a $2^m$-dim complex vector space
I dont see the obvious action.
$e_1$ has to act on $\Lambda^*(e_1 + if_1, \cdots, e_m + if_m)$ in a way that $e_1^2$ acts by $-1$
Lets do $m = 1$. Cliff_2 is generated by e, f with e^2 = f^2 = -1, ef + fe = 0. This is like quaternions
so it embeds in $M_2(\Bbb C)$
thats the 2^1 dim complex rep
Seems like I can arrange some matrices in $M_{2^m}(\Bbb C)$ in general
Just send e_1 to the block 2^m x 2^m matrix with 2x2 block (i 0|0 -i) on top, f_1 to similar but 2x2 block (0 -1|1 0), then e_2, f_2 etc with the block below it and so on