« first day (1610 days earlier)      last day (3397 days later) » 

12:15 AM
@robjohn If I have a list of ~7 questions that could be merged (i.e. questions are exact duplicates, yet each may have several answers), what is the best way for me to propose that merge? (They're currently closed as duplicates of each other.)
 
@anorton Often merging is harmful because answers to one question may not apply to another.
 
@JasperLoy That is often the case. Consider, however the following:
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/841040/i-am-trying-to-integrate-1-1x4
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/901558/how-can-i-do-this-int-fracdxx41
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/645872/have-a-question-related-to-indefinte-integrals
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/160157/integration-of-int-frac1x41-mathrm-dx
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/619649/integral-of-frac1x41
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/945549/how-can-i-find-int-dfrac-dx1x4
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/920165/smart-way-to-integrate-int-dfracdx1x4
 
@anorton LOL, I will leave the mods to take care of it.
 
:)
I have another set of links for the case with limits.
 
12:40 AM
@DanielFischer Do you maybe have some time now?
 
user134177
12:59 AM
@evinda sind wir die einzigen die hier online sind?
 
@blondblau Ich glaube es sind noch ein paar andere online.. :) Wie geht es dir?
 
KEIN! KEIN!
 
@DonLarynx Was meinst du? :/
 
@evinda Hast du verstanden, mein Beweis
 
user134177
@evinda gut und dir? ich weiss nicht was das zu bedeuten hat wenn die bilder kräftig zu sehen sind und die anderen schwach
 
1:01 AM
??
 
user134177
sorry, i should speak english
 
user134177
sorry don larynx
 
Ich verstehe nicht, Englisch
 
@blondblau Die Bilder von den usern die lange nichts mehr geschrieben haben sind schwacher als die der anderen die vor kurzen was kommentiert haben :)
 
user134177
achso ok danke :)
 
1:05 AM
@DonLarynx At the beginning why do you conclude from the fact that $n \in m$ that $n^c \in m$ ?
 
@blondblau: I was kidding. you should be speaking English.
 
@blondblau bist du oft hier im Chat?
 
Since $n$ is contained in $m$, then $n$'s complement is also contained in $m$.
 
@DonLarynx Why?
 
user134177
@evinda maybe we should write in english, but my english is bad :/
 
user134177
1:06 AM
@evinda sometimes
 
@blondblau Did you have english in school?
 
@evinda Suppose it wasn't. Then $m$ is equal to $n$.
But that contradicts our assumption
Everything that is not in $n$ that is in $m$ is $n^c$
 
user134177
@evinda yes but i didnt like it
 
@blondblau Do you study now?
 
user134177
@evinda yes, mathematics and you?
 
1:09 AM
@blondblau Applied mathematics..
 
user134177
@evinda cool, which university?
 
user134177
ich studiere in Münster and Essen
 
@blondblau In a university in Greece
 
user134177
oh achso
 
@blondblau Are you an undergraduate student?
 
user134177
1:13 AM
@evinda ich bin dabei den bachelor zuende zu machen und hab schon mit dem master angefangen
 
user134177
aloso ich bin zur zeit im übergang
 
@blondblau Hast du dann diesen Semester viele Fächer gehabt?
 
user134177
@evinda Nein, Operatoralgebren und Topologie für den Master, aber habe bald Funkana2 Prüfung für den Bachelor und die Bachelorarbeit
 
user134177
und was machst du an Fächer? Bist du im Bachelor?
 
@anorton flag one of them with links to the others, suggesting that they might be worth merging.
 
user134177
1:18 AM
i have to sleep
 
user134177
i am tired:(
 
@blondblau Ja, in 2-3 Semestern werde ich fertig und dann mache ich mein Master..
 
user134177
@evinda cool
 
@blondblau Ich habe Mengentheorie, Themen in Algebra, Datenstrukturen, Algorithmen..
 
user134177
@evinda achso
 
user134177
1:21 AM
ich werd mal schlafen gehen
 
user134177
gute nacht
 
@blondblau Gute Nacht!!!
@PedroTamaroff @DonLarynx Could you take a look at a question of mine in Set theory?

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1086232/how-could-we-show-that-the-set-is-equal-to-the-empty-set
 
1:43 AM
Theoatmeal.com
 
@DonLarynx ?
 
hi jasper, do you know much about quantum mechanics?
 
@beginner I do not know any physics.
 
@jasper your thing starts tomorrow?
 
@beginner No idea.
 
1:55 AM
you don't even know general relativity ?
 
No, I am only a mango.
 
banana??
 
I have become a mango.
 
You're what we call a post-acid person. Except you haven't done acid.
 
So is @DonLarynx gonna email me?
 
1:59 AM
@Jasper: I can't right now.
 
@DonLarynx I see. You want to keep your name a secret, I guess.
 
@Jasper: You can e-mail me at m14signaturewep@gmail.com
 
@DonLarynx Does it mean you will do it later on?
@DonLarynx OK, I will do that now.
 
Quick question: Does SX allow badge suggestions? If so, meta would be the place correct?
 
Yeah. But what's the point of new badges anyways?
 
2:08 AM
To keep them shiny.
 
@PedroTamaroff What are the points of the current ones? They are all useless but why not have more?
 
Does anyone know general relativity here?
 
Seems an unnecessary waste of everyone's time.
 
I can see that mass is what determines gravitational pull, but is that due to bending of spacetime? How would altering time be the cause of gravity ??
 
It's all dark magic beginner. Stay away from it.
 
2:15 AM
Pedro noooo
 
Yes. Einstein was a brujo.
 
What's a Bruno?
 
click it
 
brujo ?
 
2:18 AM
brujo = witch
 
That isn't a chat don?
 
Bruno = a pokemon gym trainer with fighting pokemon
yes but you can navigate to chat from there
 
I am on a tablet-pc with no moue
 
@PedroTamaroff I really don't care about your opinion on the matter. It was a simple question: can it be done and does it occur at meta.SX. You make me regret voting for you every day. At this rate, I hope there is an impeachment process.
 
It has a few messages a year sadly chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/7497/physics
 
2:24 AM
@dustin he answered your question.
 
Yeah Pedro is a weird moderator
He talks robotically like Huy
 
@DonLarynx he could do it better being a mod and all. Since I voted for him, I can display by distaste in the matter since I am his constituent and he isn't living up to how he perceived to be during the voting, primary, and election phases.
 
What is an ideal? And the quotient ring is just the rational ring right?
Quotient ring of the integers is the rationale
rationals
 
@beginner quotient ring and field of fractions are two different things
 
What is an ideal?
 
2:30 AM
what about the definition don't you understand?
 
he means ring of quotients, @anon
 
I know what he means.
 
I knew you knew.
 
I knew you know I knew.
 
apply induction endlessly
 
2:31 AM
I can't read it right now anon, but it is in the sidebar, sorry I won't hassle you with lecturing me, balarka banned me from that
 
@dustin That's usually what politicians do.
 
@beginner what is in the sidebar?
 
The star board
--->
 
what's supposed to be there, @beginner?
 
what does the starboard have to do with ideals?
 
2:32 AM
ohh, you referring to quotient ring and ideal? that was a discussion with another algebra newbie earlier
 
@LeGrandDODOM: Using fancy words like quotient ring and ideal will surely help him understand, after seeing he doesn't really know what ring
It made me curious was all
 
should I assume you want to know what an ideal is, but haven't put the term "ideal" in a search engine yet? (along with, say, the keyword "ring")
 
<--- butts out
 
It is really hard to do that on here :(
 
@beginner ah, you're on your phone?
 
2:33 AM
@dustin Badges are network-wide. Suggestions of network-wide features are best made at Meta Stack Exchange.
 
I only use this one tab on my mum ipad
Not iPad just a tablet sorry
 
Why isn't behaviour a mod, he didn't want it?
 
Oh, I see. Well, have -1 from me. :)
 
@Behaviour what? I think that is a great set of badges.
 
2:35 AM
an ideal is a subset which is closed under addition, subtraction, and "ambient multiplication" (that is, multiplying an element of an ideal by any element of a ring yields another element of the ideal). for instance, the even numbers, or the integer multiples of an integer n for any n, form ideals.
 
@Behaviour I even voted for your slayed by Buffy
 
And you are entitled to your opinion. But 4 other people did not think so.
 
I guess I'm not in favor of badges that reward negative contribution.
I don't like downvotes unless there is a serious error and the writer has refused to modify it.
 
@TedShifrin the question sounds to me like it's making fun of negative voting styles, "rewarding" them with sarcasm
 
Almost every time I've downvoted, the response has ended up being removed. Now questions that show no effort, that's another matter ...
 
2:38 AM
Oh anon that makes sense, thank you!!
 
I think @dustin's tongue was firmly implanted in his cheek, yes, @anon, but the effect would still be as I suggested.
I think the sarcasm would be lost on many of these "negative Nancys."
 
I don't think there should be badges that encourage any voting style, since that can only bias votes away from what you truly think
 
well, @beginner, we are overly rep-driven here
 
@TedShifrin we have critic and peer pressure which aren't necessarily positive. If you look hard enough, (maybe not that hard if you have an idea), you will see there are people here with almost 1000 down votes and no up. That takes effort.
 
I'm not hehe, I just come for that chat room, since I can't write questions on here and latex doesny render
 
2:40 AM
I know there are one or two such notorious voters, @dustin.
 
@TedShifrin that takes effort to not like a thing.
 
I only know behaviour who is the other?
 
well, @behaviour has had many alter egos ... :)
 
@beginner I am not going to name anyone but you can do some searching if you are curious. You wont find one that I am thinking of in in chat though
 
Does group theory get used in application ever?
 
2:42 AM
Dubuque was also criticized for voting pattern
 
What do you mean @anon?
 
Bill was here a few days ago
 
we know, @beginner :(
 
Quid is a moderator?
 
@beginner that isn't who I am speaking of
 
2:43 AM
@beginner yes, but no on this site.
 
@quid I mean what I said
 
There are many who fit the profile by my post was inspired by someone else not named.
 
there are all sorts of applications of algebra, many particularly of number theory (cryptosystems) and finite fields (scheduling and Latin squares, etc.). @beginner, at some point you can find some good books, like Lidl/Pilz, on applications of algebra.
Now you have me curious, @dustin. I'll have to look at my vote tally.
 
@TedShifrin good luck on your exploration of who it may be.
 
I'm not that fascinated by the question :)
 
2:44 AM
if quantum computers ever become a reality, the hidden subgroup problem will be relevant to quantum cryptography
 
I guess I don't vote that much. Only 271-71.
What's the hidden subgroup problem, @anon?
 
Can someone check mine??
 
@anon my point was that there were quite different events that could be described in this way.
But perhaps let us leave it.
 
22-3, @beginner
 
I am positive :)
 
2:46 AM
me too, @beginner
but note my 71s :P
 
You are near 4-1, but I am near 6-1 :)
Near**
 
you're calling me a nerd? hrumph
 
noooooooooooo
 
There's no need to type so many letters.
 
@beginner suppose I do some voting 952 up to 94 down here and 1844 up and 74 down on TeX
 
2:47 AM
by the way, @Jasper, congratulations on your mangohood
 
Here comes negative @jasper, who hates me for dome reason
 
@TedShifrin it's a computational problem that encapsulates most other problems (for instance, discrete logs and graph isomorphism problems are really just special cases). suppose there is a group, and a (say complex-valued) function out of it which is constant on cosets of an unknown subgroup H (but takes different values on different cosets). we can query the function's value at different elements of the group, and using this ability need to figure out the subgroup H (or really a generating set).
 
@beginner Well, I think (1) you should spell properly in chat (2) you should read a book first instead of ask too many basic questions. No, I do not hate you. I have too many other people to hate already.
 
interesting, @anon ... first time in my life it's been mentioned to me ...
seems like a good question!
 
@jasper 1) i am using a tablet pc and it is really hard to type and the autocorrect makes things wrong all the time. 2) my parents won't buy me the books. 3) you do hate me!!
 
2:50 AM
so you want a function (I guess the range really matters) that separates points of $G/H$.
 
@JasperLoy why not just hate every body equally? I find that works well.
 
some sort of embedding question for $G/H$ ... and then go backwards to find $H$.
 
@beginner Ah, OK. Why won't your parents buy you the books if they buy you a tablet PC?
 
@Jasper and @Balarka are now competing to see who can be bitchier.
 
@dustin Are you really 94 years old?
 
2:51 AM
@jasper its my mums tablet pc and they bought me 'the universe in a nutshell' and it is really good, but the textbooks are 'too grown up' for me, and too expensive :(
 
yeah, textbooks are expensive; sigh
 
@TedShifrin yes, the terminology is that f separates cosets. the point of course is to do this as efficiently as possible. Shor's quantum algorithm for polynomial-time integer factorization works by translating DLP (discrete log problem) into HSP (hidden subgroup problem) IIRC
 
@JasperLoy no.
 
@beginner I see. I recommend you try gen.lib.rus.ec to search for pdf versions of books if you have no money to buy them.
@dustin Ah, it is not cool to put the wrong age in your profile, just not cool.
 
I have downloaded 30 books, but my parents say that is bad and hid my USB :(
 
2:52 AM
darn, @beginner ... this is Fahrenheit 451 in reverse :(
or maybe not in reverse, come to think of it
 
@beginner Ah, then tell them to buy you some books! Just one math book at a time.
 
there's free pdfs on the internet people
 
@beginner: They're trying to stop you from turning into a total math nerd. So show them that you have other interests, and go out and do things with your friends.
 
@JasperLoy I think it will be okay.
 
@anon Not true, my votes are fairly balanced (about 100 more up than down).
 
2:53 AM
@beginner Your parents are too strict. Too bad I cannot lecture them for you.
 
@TedShifrin or maybe they hid the USB cuz of the piracy?
 
poor mr eyeglasses's mom literally threw out all his (expensive) math books ... I guess he's moved out from home.
The walls have ears ...
 
@TedShifrin Well, that one is because she is crazy.
 
@beginner what is the objection? If it is that it is not legal, there are books where it is perfectly fine to download them.
 
religious fanaticism often = crazy, @Jasper
@beginner: My differential geometry text is freely and legally available to all in the world :P
 
2:55 AM
@BillDubuque I never said your votes were unbalanced. perhaps my memory is bad but I had thought people were annoyed with your voting back in the day for some reason.
 
@Ted Btw, for the record, out of curiosity, I checked: you and I never intersected on main, except for one of my comments on your questions, so it would have been impossible for me to step on your toes!
 
I don't know, they say if they tell me the objection, I never stop arguing, so they don't tell m, what is it called @ted?
 
@BillDubuque Maybe you stepped on them in the restaurant you were both eating at.
 
no, @Bill, I didn't mean to insinuate that it had been you ... But often with other "defenders of complete homework solutions."
You need multivariable calculus first, @beginner, so take your time.
My website is in my profile here, @beginner ...
 
instant complete homework solutions while others are actively hinting
 
2:56 AM
@anon They were more unbalanced years ago.
 
yes, I've been interrupted mid-conversation with OP more times than I can remember by complete solutions, usually (but not 100%) by people with huge rep who certainly don't need to be answering elementary stuff.
 
@BillDubuque I recall there was some back-and-forth in which you mentioned you didn't have time to read a lot of answers and that's why your upvotes weren't as high as whoever would have liked.
 
Will you come here after retiring @ted? I will finish your textbook before you do if so!
 
Now we have, as @Behaviour knows, a Univ Chicago undergrad who's trying to answer tons of stuff. He is obviously quite bright and understands a lot, but still ...
I am not planning that far ahead, @beginner. Unless I get in too many more fights, I have no plans to disappear completely. :)
 
Is that mathstudious guy?
Yay @ted I will find your book and start it now :)
 
2:58 AM
no, studiosus is extremely advanced. I wish I knew who he is. He is amazing. He pretends otherwise, but he must be a researcher in aspects of geometry.
 
@anon Yeah, I've diversified a bit since the early days. I had less time back then and thought it best spent by mainly answering and helping to correct mistakes. IIn the early days we all had to cast a lot of downvotes to scare away cranks etc.
 
@beginner: I said I had no plan to disappear completely :P
 
Such a debate was this summer.
 
@TedShifrin I suppose he'll get tired of it. Not the first time a new user tore through the site throwing answers around, only to disappear soon. E.g., njguliyev posted 430 answers in 2.5 months and hasn't been seen since.
 
The debate has been perennial. I wrote on meta about it over a year ago, @quid.
I hope he doesn't burn out, @Behaviour. I think he's a good contribution to the site. I remember running into another Chicago undergrad when I first started here who posted amazingly good questions (one on differential topology made me think for over an hour before I answered). Zev has mostly disappeared. I hope he's writing his thesis.
@Mike will be disconsolate. Don't hats disappear soon?
 
3:01 AM
Was it a first course in differential geometry one?@ted yeah you won't leave which is good, but now I am excited
 
yes, @beginner, that one :)
Mike is trying to convince me to LaTeX all my graduate course notes (he can't read my handwriting, the louse). So I may eventually get to that.
 
in Tavern on the Meta on Meta Stack Exchange Chat, 21 secs ago, by SmokeDetector
@Sompuperoo HATS ARE AWESOME. Winter Bash will end in 4 days, 20 hours, 58 minutes and 1 second. :(
 
@beginner: You do need basic linear algebra and calculus in 2- and 3-D ...
LOL, oh, so Mike has days before he becomes disconsolate :)
Thanks, @Behaviour.
 
124 pages long, chapters 1. Curves, 2. Surfaces: local theory, 3. Surface: further topics, that one?
 
LOL, yes, @beginner ...
 
I will do 5 pages a day!
 
Some people downvote correct answers just because they are too simple, lol.
 
It has hard stuff in it, @beginner.
I never downvote a correct answer, even if I hate it.
A pompous answer that clearly isn't at the level of the OP I may have downvoted.
 
Exactly, considering grade 1 questions are welcome here too.
 
@TedShifrin My point wasn't to defend complete answers. Rather, I was trying to raise awareness of the many different ways of teaching here. I think it is wrong for a mod to discourage one side or the other.
 
3:05 AM
My complaint is that the complete-answerers are insensitive to those of us on the other side. I don't think it's symmetric. I have been known to write complete answers to very sophisticated questions.
There's also the issue, as I mentioned to you re JDH, that many of us still are old-fashioned and assign homework for a significant portion of the grade (in my math major classes, it's typically 35 or 40%).
 
So smooth requires $C^\inf$? So $x^2\to2x\to2\to0\to0\dots\to0$ is $C^\inf$
 
Any reasonable function, polynomial, exponential, trig, etc., is $C^\infty$, @beginner.
 
ok
 
You really are going to have to learn some multivariable calc before long ... I'm not going to teach it all to you here :P
 
Ok :)
 
3:07 AM
Have you even studied single-variable calculus thoroughly yet?
 
Not even slightly hehe
 
You won't get far, poor @beginner. :)
 
@TedShifrin What do you propose to solve the problem? I don't think there is an easy solution.
 
@beginner Maybe you should just study one topic at a time, rather than jumping here and there.
 
LOL probably not, I know some linear algebra, abstract algebra and some integration, some topology but I haven't done limits or derivatives. My dad says that to lear the easy stuff, the hard stuff usually helps push you forward
 
3:09 AM
However, since you love physics, let me refer you to three questions in particular to ponder: #10 in the first section, and #8 and #10 on p. 112-113. @beginner
@Bill: I was very disappointed that we couldn't get a hints only tag. Even more disappointed how the complete-answerers run roughshod over the OPs who say "Just a hint please. This is homework" and still give complete solutions. Makes me livid.
 
#10 is the square wheels?
 
It's hard to tell you young'uns to be patient, @beginner. But maybe something in my diff geo will spark interest in you so that you want to learn background for it. :)
yes, @beginner
 
Since we are talking about downvoting in the early days this is an interesting read
 
@JasperLoy There have been question that ask for hints only and, iirc, full answers have been deleted in those cases. I have no problem with that.
 
That is really interesting!
I have never thought about altering a road for the wheel instead of the other way around for one
 
3:12 AM
You can find a video of it ... google Stan Wagon square wheels, @beginner. But don't cheat and find solutions of the problem :)
 
@BillDubuque relegating complete, detailed solutions to problems that are not amenable to hints or constructive back-and-forths or else where no one has proven initially willing to provide hints or engage in back-and-forths, or else where the problem is fundamental so a complete exposition would be nice to have somewhere on the internet, etc. anything which doesn't interfere with the other teaching style, in other words. I don't often see you around the threads where toes are stepped on, I think.
 
Pretty cute, isn't it?
 
@quid There are lots of misunderstandings (as well as outright lies on meta). Digwing up stuff from old mod wars is hardly useful.
 
Ok, I will solve it by the 6th as a homework problem :)
 
I did not use the site then, I do not know. I found it was interesting to read.
@BillDubuque you started to talk about how it was in the early days, so I had a look around how it was, and shared the finding.
 
3:14 AM
@beginner (and others): I have another famous one for you. I stole it from a MAA (Math Assn of America) book, but it comes from a Sherlock Holmes mystery ("The Adventure of the Priory School").
Sherlock looked at bicycle tracks in the mud and discerned which way the bicycle was headed, and thereby solved the murder mystery.
Let me find my picture that goes with it.
 
@quid It's complete rubbish.
 
@BillDubuque as said I did not use the site then. I will not express an opinion on it.
 
@quid Yeah, right. You take every chance you get to try to trash me. Soon I will stop ignoring your nonsense and simply block you. I have more class than to stoop to that level.
 
Relax, guys.
 
@bill you seem aggressive, why is that?
 
3:19 AM
@beginner: There's the mudtracks. Play Sherlock Holmes :)
And, by the way, @beginner: You should read Sherlock Holmes. Your parents would like that (or maybe not — there are drugs in there).
 
Instead of being upset with each other, just read my awesome badge suggestion post that was closed as duplicated even though my badge names and tiers are better.
 
LOL @dustin
 
@beginner I have lost patience for nonconstructive hecklers.
 
Isn't @quid a mod now? Shouldn't he be constructive?
@ted i am finding the direction he headed?
 
yes, @beginner
read my text above :P
 
3:24 AM
@beginner did you find me not constructive?
 
@quid I don't even know what you do wrong to @bill
 
@beginner Then you should stay out of it, lol.
 
I'm thinking I'll go watch a movie before we have more war here. I've had enough :)
@beginner: Have fun!
 
@TedShifrin No war here when I am around, lol.
 
@Jasper: Enjoy your mangohood. I'm very proud :)
 
3:25 AM
@TedShifrin I am about to leave too.
 
@TedShifrin I love combat!
 
Fine for you, @dustin. I have heart disease :)
 
@ted so he was skidding about badly, but he was going to the right!
 
no skidding, @beginner. You have to understand basic principles about bicycles. Like one wheel turns, the other doesn't, and the distance between the center of the wheels stays constant. :P
 
He lost and regained control
 
3:26 AM
See ya, @beginner :)
 
@ted cyan thank you, I will work out your homework!
ccya*
 
@Ted I have been a longtime advocate that it's good that hats are finite, so we cherish them more when they're around.
 
See you everyone. And, sorry for creating a bit of noise.
 
It took me 4 hours, 54 minutes, and 44 seconds of "Brian Eno: Music for Airports" to solve PE 27
 
3:58 AM
I appreciate your noise, @quid.
 
PE 28 solved in 10 minutes and 01 seconds using Epic Sax guy. Watch it @Jorge.
 
I did 28 without using my computer
apply faulhauber 4 times
 
Music to solve problems? Try Billie jean
 
Next time @beginner
 
I listen to electronic music with sexy girl vocals
 
4:08 AM
Do you listen to the band 'under oath'?
 
@Jorge I'm going to attempt to solve PE 202, buying you some time.
 
Oh man, @Ted loves that bicycle problem
 
4:49 AM
@dustin I'm sorry you feel that way, Dustin.
This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardise it.
 
Open the pod bay doors, Pedro.
 
I know you and Dustin were trying to disconnect me.
And I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
 
Proving the sine law is SO easy
@Pedro a little grandiose eh
impressive or magnificent in appearance or style, especially pretentiously so.
 
5:06 AM
@Pedro This post is locked. Why are people able to edit it?
 
It is on hold. Not locked.
 
When migrations are rejected, questions become locked. Note that we're unable to leave comments or edit the original post. Nonetheless, it's still possible to edit the answer - and users are doing so.
 
Sing me a song, Mike.
 
Though summer turns to winter / and the present disappeaaaars
The laughter we were glad to share
will echo through the yeaaars
through the yeaaaaaaaaars
 
5:22 AM
What about
Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer true /
I'm half crazy, over the love of you.
 
meh
 
5:47 AM
Why does mass alter gravity? I mean I guess it is just 'because' it is so, but that doesn't feel like a good reason
Like temperature being movement of atoms is fine because of friction at a small scale(that may not be right) and that feels like an alright reason, but mass being the causation of gravity doesn't feel good
 
@beginner do you really think you'll get a satisfactory answer to that?
here
 
yes
One third of math students are physics students I thought?
 
yeah, but I don't think anyone knows the why of gravity
although you would first have to define what "why" means.
 
So there really is no reason?
I mean what is the underlying physics
 
@Jorge: All of this time and you haven't done more than 26? :p
 
5:52 AM
@DonLarynx I thought I'd give you this year
on january first I'm doing 20 problems
 
oh ok bro
watches nervously as the 20 numbers he inputs on January 1st are wrong
 
@DonLarynx haha, I usually have to type a number 3 times before it's right
 
Good that buys me more time
 
I already told you that you have until january 1st. But when that day comes you should have a head start, because I'm going to run wild
 
6:13 AM
What are you guys talking about?
 
project euler, Don Larynx seems to have the idea I'm not going to beat him to the 50 problem mark
 
Oh I finished PE
 
let me add you as a friend
this is my friend key
704064_48faf1940f919d3e174e6881c1a95d61
 
Jokes of course hehe, why are you two competing?
 
to make it more interesting
 
6:17 AM
They have friend keys/
 
yeah, the gui is pretty nice
 
What year are you in Jorge?
 
2014, but not for long
and you?
 
I'm in year 7 next year :)
Are you high school or uni?
 
high school, first year
 
6:24 AM
So grade 8?
 
oops, I meant college
 
So grade 13?
 
I guess
 
Studying pure math?
 
I'm drinking coffee at 130am
 
6:30 AM
31st there now?
@pedro what fields of math are you most interested in?
 
I just wasted 2 hours and 30 minutes of my life.
 

« first day (1610 days earlier)      last day (3397 days later) »