« first day (907 days earlier)      last day (4101 days later) » 

3:00 AM
is that what your refering too?
or some other partial dt
 
you have putatively shown that at least one residue class has infinitely many primes, but in order to show all of the classes do you need to know that each and every limit is not zero (you are correct that existence is irrelevant), but your method (which is to show each limit is equal) doesn't work if convergence is an issue
 
I know the limits wont be zero, but I don't know if they exist
 
@Ethan how do you know each of them won't be zero?
 
They could all oscilate between a finite value, but when summed together not oscilate
Because with the last line showing that the sum is equal to one, it implies one of them must converge to somthing positive ( as each term is itself always positive) and the total sum is positive
 
(the limit of a ratio of two positive quantities can still be zero)
 
3:02 AM
I know
but if they all were zero
then we wouldnt get one on the rhs
 
right, that shows that they are not all simultaneously zero, which proves partial DT. to get full DT, you need each summand to be nonzero.
 
I don't understand, but doesn't that imply atleast one summand is not zero
and the previous argument shows all the limits are equal
 
um, what shows the limits are all equal?
 
It shows there equal if the limits exist, as you mentioned
which was the problem
 
they're
"It"?
 
3:04 AM
$$\lim_{s\to 1}\frac{1}{\zeta(s)}\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{\Lambda(ak+b)}{(ak+b)^s}=\frac{1}{a}\sum_{\substack{\gcd(a,r)=1\\1\leq r\leq a}}\sum_{k=0}^\infty\frac{-\ln(ak+r)\mu(ak+r)}{(ak+r)}$$
Which shows that there is no dependence on b, provide the limit exists
which is what you pointed out, that I don't know it exists
 
I identified an issue earlier: how do you know the limits, if they exist, are all equal, if we don't know that $\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{-\ln(ak+r)\mu(ak+r)}{(ak+r)}$ exists?
 
Yes that is the problem
 
I am not just talking about the limit on the left.
I just rewrote it, not two seconds ago.
Having to repeat myself to you over and over again is exhausting.
 
sorry
 
they're
 
3:07 AM
Assuming it does exist am I okay? I will try to work on geting a proof of that
 
Assuming each series $\sum_{k=0}^\infty$ on the RHS exists, then yes.
 
I can show that they exist, when the modulus a is prime
 
Well, I will be going home now.
 
thanks for the help
I appreciate it alot
 
cool
(it was mostly exhausting because there's so much latex involved, I should clarify)
 
3:13 AM
@anon hey
Have you finished discussing with ethan?
 
@BenjaLim
 
yes?
 
Why do polynomials of the form:

$(a+b+c)^n+(a-b-c)^n-(a-b+c)^n-(a+b-c)^n$

Take on, such a 'nice' expansion?
For example at $3,5$ we get,

$$(a+b+c)^3+(a-b-c)^3-(a-b+c)^3-(a+b-c)^3=24abc$$
$$(a+b+c)^5+(a-b-c)^5-(a-b+c)^5-(a+b-c)^5=80abc(a^2+b^2+c^2)$$
 
No I don't think so.
 
no what
 
3:19 AM
no deep reason
 
o
 
you are asking why an identity like that is tautologically true
 
what do you mean tautologically
 
meaning to say that identity you wrote
is true even before you wrote it down :D
No I'm joking
 
I don't understand lol
 
3:20 AM
those identities are true directly from the axioms
 
Is there a field of mathematics equiped with tools capable of determineing parametric equations for diophantine equations
 
what do you mean?
 
like finding polynomials satisfieing nice propertys
 
No I don't think so.
 
like lets say I wanted 3 polynomials whose cubes added up to a square
oh
@BenjaLim Do you know about p-adics?
 
3:31 AM
no not really.
 
I thought you did alot of commutative algebra
 
yes but I haven't really studied completions.
@Ethan ok tell me what the p-adics are then.
 
I don't know alot
 
then why are you talking about them when you say << I don't know >> ?
 
I was going to ask for help on proving an identity
related to p-adics
 
3:36 AM
You want to prove an identity involving p-adics but don't know what they are?
 
I didn't mean to say I don't know
I meant to say I don't know alot
 
4:22 AM
@anon Hey, I seem to get myself in knots and can't figure out why in your post here the order of $k/(q+1)$ must be $q^2 - 1$. I am only able to prove that the order is greater than $q + 1$. It seems we should be able to deduce from $(k,q^2 - 1) = q+1$ that $(k/(q+1),q^2 - 1) = 1$ but I'm not seeing somehow.
@Sanchez hey
 
you can't deduce that; (18,5^2-1)=5+1 but (18/(5+1),5^2-1)=3.
 
yes.
@anon so why should the order of $k/(q+1)$ be $q^2 - 1$?
 
perhaps it shouldn't
 
@anon hmmm
@anon my answer is wrong then.
 
4:45 AM
@BenjaLim, hey
 
5:01 AM
so now that I'm a couple weeks into this semester
I'm getting the impression that Differential Equations is just going to be a set of silly tricks to help solve DEs
 
@Gnintendo Is it upper or lower division DEs?
 
 
1 hour later…
6:21 AM
@BDub lower? I'm an undergraduate
this is my first DE class
(I'm a freshman)
 
6:41 AM
would anyone be willing to look over a simple undergrad paper for me?
 
Anthony your 14 years old
 
Shhh*
 
Prodigy!
 
I just finished my paper for CA
It's my first math paper
 
Ca?
 
6:44 AM
by CA I mean Complex Analysis not California aha
 
lol I think you should study more
 
Study what more?
Why ahaha?
and N-nacci* numbers not just fibonacci
I just wanted to find a new way to go about things that hasn't already been exhausted
I dooo
It's tribonacci
tetranacci
pentanacci
so it suffices to say n-nacci
 
what is your profile picture anthony?
 
A skull
 
of what?
 
6:51 AM
It's a deformed skull
human
 
why?
 
I dunno, it was the first thing that popped up in my downloaded pictures. I used it last year for something
 
 
1 hour later…
Tai
8:00 AM
$f(x)$
can we use Latex here?
 
@Tai yes you can, see the starboard for more instructions. $\LaTeX$ support for chat
 
 
1 hour later…
9:32 AM
Hi all
Do you know some nice way to compute $\int_0^1 \frac{1}{x^4+1}$? I'm looking for something fast.
 
9:48 AM
hi
how can use tex in word
2013
 
10:26 AM
@Chris'ssister use a partial fraction decomposition of th eintegrand
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez: thanks. However, this way is a bit too long.
 
oh you want a magic way
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez: hehe. Something like a magic way. :-)
 
Mathematica does it in a quiff.
 
you need to adjust your definition of too long if that computation seems too long for you
 
10:38 AM
It is good to know how it is done, but otherwise I see no use in not just computing it with a CAS and verifying if that is right.
Unless it is for a course... (and it does not get much faster than that).
But a couple of trickies are to make it one to $0$ to $\infty$, then contours.
 
Hi @JonasTeuwen how are you today
 
I hardly could sleep because my legs were on firrrre!
 
@JonasTeuwen darn - sorry to hear that
 
I can handle the pain, not a biggie.
Plenty of spare vertebrae.
 
@JonasTeuwen Watching Murray - Djokovic match ... gripping stuff
 
10:46 AM
Some splendid spines they have eh?
 
@JonasTeuwen spines, legs, arms - not much about them that is not amazing
maybe their hairstyles :)
 
Sometimes it is.
Straight out of bed onto the playing court.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen I keep a cold pack in my fridge for all purposes, such as cooling my head.
 
Alright.
 
user19161
@OldJohn Maybe the hair is the only amazing thing. =)
 
10:53 AM
It is not actually on fire by the way, the nerve is compressed much higher, so cooling my legs will do... shit.
 
Time for more coffee - back later, folks
 
You had not enough? Good.
I have that one in my office.
I did not put it there.
 
user19161
12:07 PM
@JonasTeuwen Those who take whisky instead are called gods, like you!
 
Not while working eh.
 
user19161
1:02 PM
@JonasTeuwen I figured out why I got different image search results. It was not because of a different browser identity. It is because google is changing its search algorithm these days, and it seems the matter is not settled.
 
1:20 PM
@JasonBourne Google is changing its algorithms everyday, there is a reason why it is called machine learning. :-)
@OldJohn There was a time when my build was like that. wistful only 10-13 cm shorter. :P
 
1:42 PM
How do I get a continued fraction for tan(x)?
 
@OrangeHarvester How's it going?
 
user19161
2:12 PM
@OrangeHarvester Yes, but in this case it's a major change.
 
user19161
@pourjour I don't know how to do that, but the equation editor is pretty good. Just set the toolbar to show the icon so that you save many clicks each time you wanna insert an equation.
 
2:31 PM
@Novice Its going good. How are you?
 
@OrangeHarvester I am okay. :-)
 
@Novice Good!
 
2:51 PM
can you show me how to get the continued fraction for tan please
 
@, Christian Blatter. May I email you about something?
Let me test if ping works for someone not in chat
 
user19161
3:13 PM
@Worker That ping won't work. You need to use at followed by the first three characters without any space. Also, you should just use this at notification as a comment on the site, not in chat in this way if you want to get his attention. If you comment on the author's posts you need not use an at.
 
@JasonBourne I am not really trying to comment on a post of his. I am trying to ask him something more general and specifically him.
@ChristianBlatter work?
I mean will it work?
 
user19161
@Worker I am not sure if it works. If it does it will notify all such usernames on the network. Also, you can just comment on any post of his. I think that is a better method. Even if not related to that post.
 
Here... I'll leave the chatroom, and send one at me.
 
@anorton, do you know continued fractions
 
@JasonBourne ok. :)
Thanks
 
user19161
3:19 PM
@anorton That does not count. You are in here recently, so the algorithm takes care of that.
 
@user58512 I know how to read continued fractions, but not how to derive them...
@JasonBourne Oh. OK.
 
I can't get my mind off this continued fraction
 
 
1 hour later…
4:42 PM
Hi may I ask some, in which program is that simulaton written
16
Q: Cover time chess board (king)

JackConsider a random walk of a king on a standard chess board, which at each step moves to a uniformly random permitted square. What's the exact mean time to visit all squares (cover time), starting from a corner square? Is there an algebraic solution?

 
f s
@Jack python i think
 
5:19 PM
@Sanchez I just saw this beautiful proof in algebraic number theory
using Tor
and of all the proofs
that for me is the simplest
It captures the entire essence of the proof.
 
5:29 PM
Plotting world domination.
 
Hello! Advise me please some book where one can find a proof of the classification theorem for 2D closed connected manifolds, if you know some!
 
@JonasTeuwen Your cat?
 
I wish. It is so awesome.
 
@JonasTeuwen Reminds me of my cat.
 
5:44 PM
It is awesome.
What is its name?
 
Pêto.
Just found this on my pc.
 
Pêto. Cool.
 
6:08 PM
I have found a simple invariance property of the of the zeta function on the critical line. One can add or subtract a constant in the frequency domain and still get the same imaginary part in the time domain. No idea why that happens. It does not work for the real part.
Both the Fourier transform of the upper and lower spectrum (blue and blue) give apparently the same imaginary part (red). Not sure that it is a discovery though. Could be some simple real imaginary part distinction.
Just to clarify. I took the Fourier transform of the first blue picture and got the red picture. Then I added 1000 to the upper blue picture and got the lower blue picture. And then I took the Fourier transform of the lower blue picture and got the same red picture again.
Bedtime here. See you later.
 
you mention an upper blue pic, a lower blue pic, and a red pic - which makes three pics. all I see is one blue pic followed by one red (or purpleish) pic...
 
@anon I see three pics. upper blue, lower blue and a red one.
 
6:42 PM
will anyone help me with continued fractions please
 
6:53 PM
someone good at algebra
 
How does capital of USA write New York or New Jork
 
user19161
@arber New York is not the capital.
 
@user58512, possible typo in your source, evidently this comes more naturally written as hyperbolic functions...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_continued_fraction#Applications In the end it does not matter, one may have continued fractions with complex entries.
 
7:09 PM
thanks @WillJagy
did you see my post?
 
@user58512, yes, I saw it, that was how I knew the approximate topic of interest.
 
I haven't investigated convergence of it yet
 
I suggest buying Whittaker and Watson, which was originally from the 1900's but is re-issued. Meanwhile, it has the most complete section on hypergeometric functions and other special functions, which is what you are looking at.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whittaker_and_Watson and
http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an=whittaker&bi=0&bx=off&ds=30&recentlyadded=all&sortby=17&sts=t&tn=a+course+in+modern+analysis&x=66&y=13
 
user19161
@WillJagy Hehe, Old John and I have a copy.
 
what about: Jones, William B.; Thron, W. J. (1980). Continued Fractions: Theory and Applications?
 
7:23 PM
@user58512, never seen it, I'm sure it is fine. The reasons for my recommendation are the mentions by Wadim Zudilin, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wadim_Zudilin
 
ok thanks
 
user19161
Ooh the edits here are quite funny. math.stackexchange.com/posts/33730/revisions
 
Wadim is quite a tennis enthusiast. He is teaching a course in Melbourne. I am convinced he arranged that to attend the Australian Open on weekends. I told him to teach in giant glasses this week, as they seem to have helped Azarenka: foxnews.com/sports/2013/01/26/…
 
haha
 
hahahaha
 
user19161
7:26 PM
But I am happy with the final edit. It takes out irrelevant stuff without changing the author's intention.
 
7:42 PM
How can I get answer to my question?
 
7:58 PM
By answering it.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen This will get you slapped.
 
Yeah man.
That is ridiculous.
Why expect others to solve your problems?
That's not the way it goes.
 
Hi everyone
 
user19161
@gus How is your schoolwork going?
 
8:14 PM
Ooh, if I could only make a suggested edit.. then I'd have 45678 ;-)
 
user19161
@robjohn But it is transient!
 
user19161
I prefer to keep mine at a multiple of 5.
 
@JasonBourne Well, I don't even have that now. Someone downvoted my only question >8(
 
user19161
Hey @math congrats on getting 200 rep! Now you even have an association bonus of 100!
 
How the hell did that happen?
 
user19161
8:18 PM
Oh once you have 200 on a site and you join more than one site, each account gets 100 automatically...
 
ohhh last I looked I was at 180
 
@math101 Congrats, Canuck lover! (or I assume so from your gravatar)
 
Thanks @robjohn :)
 
@robjohn, I added all my working out for a new approach, what do you think?
 
@user58512 where?
 
8:20 PM
 
user19161
@robjohn Well, just try to downvote some answers. I usually don't do that, but I do it to keep at multiple of 5.
 
@user58512 Ah, I just found it, too :-)
@JasonBourne I won't sully my record, just to keep my rep at $0\bmod{5}$
 
user19161
@robjohn Mine has been sullied already, so I might as well go for the other record.
 
@JasonBourne Are there enough bad question/answers to downvote?
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester Well, just look hard and try to think of some reason...
 
8:23 PM
@JasonBourne That seems somewhat unethical.
 
I agree
hahaha
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester But if you downvote mine I will have to downvote someone else. =)
 
@user58512 I will look again at it in a bit.
 
user19161
@math101 Haha, you like using haha like me.
 
@JasonBourne really? revenge?
 
user19161
8:24 PM
@OrangeHarvester No, that is because if you downvote my post, I will need to shed points to keep it at a multiple of 5.
 
Well i tend to be in the receiving end of these down votes and I tend to see no reason for them. Just baseless hatred :)
 
user19161
@math101 How many have you gotten?
 
user19161
Only one downvote so far, not many!
 
You are right
lol
 
user19161
Hey I like using LOL too!
 
user19161
8:27 PM
But I like to capitalise it.
 
@JasonBourne I haven't got single downvote till now, and I don't want you downvoting any of my answers.
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester I downvote very few answers anyway.
 
@JasonBourne Okay.
 
@JasonBourne I'm remembering of the elementary math I forgot.
 
user19161
@GustavoBandeira Elementary math is the hardest. For example, what is $\pi$? That is a very deep question that you may not even cover in your course.
 
8:36 PM
what is pi?
can you tell me about it @JasonBourne, I'm studying pi now
 
user19161
@user58512 Well, I was referring to how the constant is defined in analysis and then shown to agree with our geometric intuition. You can look this up in various places. It can be treated in various ways.
 
thx
 
user19161
Even things like infinite decimals. How many courses actually deal with them these days?
 
user19161
Yet even school kids use infinite decimals.
 
@user58512 I see that you just deleted your addition to your question. That was not the way to go?
 
user19161
8:45 PM
OMG does this hurt your eyes? math.stackexchange.com/questions/288318/…
 
there
I just forgot to multiply the last terms by 5
 
user19161
@rob is now of the same colour as @orange.
 
@JasonBourne You mean OH?
 
user19161
Wow I notice the questions are getting downvoted viciously these days!
 
user19161
@robjohn Yes, there is only one orange in this chat. And there is also one banana.
 
9:01 PM
@JasonBourne It's hard to tell if the color is the same since Orange Harvester has a varying orange
 
@JasonBourne Yes.
 
user19161
I answered my first question after a long break, I am back baby!
 
@robjohn, I got it sorted and it's easy proof by induction - but I need to get convergence now
 
user19161
@rob My rep now is 14325 which is an anagram of 12345.
 
user19161
However I expect to lose 100 rep soon from association bonus since I deleted my other accounts.
 
9:13 PM
@JasonBourne why did you delete your other accounts?
@user58512 I haven't completed my work on the continued fraction. I will be interested to see yours :-)
 
reload
5
Q: How to do a very long division: continued fraction for tan

user58512I want to compute $$\tan(r) = \cfrac{r}{1 - \cfrac{r^2}{3 - \cfrac{r^2}{5 - \cfrac{r^2}{7 - {}\ddots}}}}$$ by dividing the power series for sin and cos as it is said can be done in http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1929. When I try it I get $$\frac{\sin(r)}{\cos(r)} = \frac{r}{1 + r^2\cdot\frac{\frac{...

it's there
In complex analysis, Gauss's continued fraction is a particular class of continued fractions derived from hypergeometric functions. It was one of the first analytic continued fractions known to mathematics, and it can be used to represent several important elementary functions, as well as some of the more complicated transcendental functions. History Lambert published several examples of continued fractions in this form in 1768, and both Euler and Lagrange investigated similar constructions, but it was Carl Friedrich Gauss who utilized the clever algebraic trick described in the next secti...
@robjohn, so it's answered
 
Would anyone be willing to look over a paper for me?
 
@AnthonyPeter, do you understand that you cannot submit such a paper for publication?
 
Huh?
@user58512 You're saying if I ask someone to look it over I can't submit it?
 
no, I mean the fibonacci thing is not a new result
 
9:28 PM
Oh, no I completely changed it
I just included the derivation of Binet's Formula at the very end of my paper as the trivial result
 
user19161
@robjohn To focus purely on math.
 
every linear recurrence can be put into a closed form, as algebraic exponentials
 
user19161
@user58512 Well, if it is not a new result but a new proof or it has some value otherwise, it may be published in some magazines for example.
 
@user58512 It's not the end result that's interesting
but the method
@JasonBourne Yeah, it's not necessarily a new result, but an interesting method of arriving at such a resuly
 
I'd be interested if the method works for something other than linear recurrences
> your
 
9:53 PM
@user58512 such as?
 

« first day (907 days earlier)      last day (4101 days later) »