@SPArcheon I didn't read the whole thing, but I'm pretty sure I know what's it about from the title. Raiden Shogun had a skill description that said her skill would work different than it actually did, which basically made her a must-have character, she would basically become essential in any team comp for the utility and damage boost she provided.
The whales in genshin spend tens of thousands of dollars to get c6 of the character, get the weapon, max her out, only to find out that the skill doesn't work as described. Mihoyo then "fixes" the description and now people are mad because the character they spent way too much money on isn't what they thought they were getting
it's not being mad about a skill description, it's being mad about the character not working as initially advertised
and in a gacha game where people literally spend tens of thousands of dollars, that can be pretty serious
from the reddit thread > Specifically, it is on the grounds of the unethical description change that happened an hour after everyone pulled.
@Elise not very precise. Raiden has a skill that is kinda useful, but it is also made less useful by her element, Electro. Electro based attack apparently are considered less efficient compared to other element because their reactions are a) less powerful and b) often cause big knock-back, which is regarded more as a problem than something useful most of the time.
that said, she was seen as a potential match to one specific character that already used Electro damage. The character called "Beidou" - the idea was to trigger her special attack which gives an effect that triggers on normal attack DAMAGE, switch to Raiden and use her special attack while boosted by Beidou.
The problem apparently is that while in her special mode Raiden still uses normal attacks, the damage of those normal attacks is considered Burst Damage.
And apparently the game makes a distinction between the attack and the damage type.
So, you have special abilities that trigger on a normal attack that can be triggered while Raiden uses her Musou move because the attacks are still normal and then you have Beidou special cases that does not trigger because her move is coded to look at the damage TYPE instead than the attack type.
The fuss apparently was caused by the fact that many player watched beta-leaks and in the beta Beidou did indeed trigger on Raiden special. So when they found out that the actual release didn't work as the CLOSED beta (which technically was under NDA) they raged.
The legal thing came into play because the wording on the skill is quite incomprehensible, borderline wrong, and was changed AFTER the character released, so now people are claiming that the product was altered after being sold.
The fact that the demo you can play with Raiden does not include Beidou (so you can't realize the problem before getting the actual char or reading about it) is also a part of the chaos
@Unionhawk WHUT?
Wasn't the dog like "no more demo until complete???"
The oldest question on identify-this-game-like questions that I found here is 7 years old. So my introduction question is whether this class of questions are or are not allowed here as of today (2021)?
If they're allowed, then currently the game-identification tag's wiki states (emphasis mine):
...
If I'm not mistaken, recommissioning a power plant is the way to avoid nuclear accidents.
Per some descriptions I saw around, I should do that every 10 to 20 turns.
So, is there a way to know for how long a Nuclear Power Plant has been running?
I would be impossible to pen+paper to track that kin...
There is a on going Meta SE post about unpinning the accepted answers on a post from the top of the list of answers. In fact, Stack Oveflow has already unpinned the accepted answers.
For Stack Overflow, there are good reasons behind the change. As a developer, I'll often see older questions on S...
Didn't stop until less than 2 months ago when the lawsuit happened and Blizzard had one of the worst PR fumbles I've seen in a long time
Like, literally, if they had just said "We take these accusations very seriously and will start an immediate investigation into the facts and fully cooperate with the investigation by the California DEFH", I would probably still be playing, but instead they claimed they were outdated lies and an attempt at the California government to bully the company out of the state. Definitely also didn't help that they tried to act like they knew how the family of one of the victims felt
But now? Every week they dig themselves into a deeper hole
Like, 2 days ago they got a THIRD lawsuit filed against them, this time for retaliation and other unfair labor practices
@InvaderSkoodge it really depends on the content of the site in particular. kinda glad that this is a site configuration option rather than a network-wide setting
@InvaderSkoodge i honestly play ffxiv like a singleplayer game most of the time
really, the whole game feels designed from that aspect
more like a singleplayer game with occasional multiplayer elements than a WoW-esque MMORPG
Fun fact about US drug names - under FDA rules, the name of the drug must not imply it actually works, which explains why the name of most drugs sound like complete nonsense unrelated to what they actually do, because if they actually named the condition they're for they may violate this rule
Related fun fact: "Tylenol" and "acetaminophen" are both derived from the full chemical name of the drug: N-acetyl-para-aminophenol and N-acetyl-para-aminophenol