« first day (2592 days earlier)      last day (1781 days later) » 

2:43 AM
Oh
 
 
4 hours later…
7:06 AM
@1,3-feeds there goes my entire morning...phew that was long
 
7:18 AM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I think we both are trying to say things with similar motive, to close less and answer more. There's one point, though, that I hope you have thought out well:
" I also personally believe that re-explaining a topic explained in countless textbooks does not add anything other than a statistical data point to the site."
nvm I'll comment there itself
 
 
2 hours later…
9:09 AM
@orthocresol Haha burn of the week
@GaurangTandon That doesn't really explain much except your stance.
 
9:39 AM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ wait what?
 
@GaurangTandon It's just saying you're closer to the preservation extreme of the spectrum
Which isn't a bad thing
 
Lol I can actually get Peer Pressure on meta now
(By abusing the mod ability to delete accepted answers...)
 
Heh, that Dropbox thing?
 
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ ah ok
 
Yeah. It seems people really don’t like it.
 
9:45 AM
HAHAHAHAHAHHHA do it! Then I can pretend you were wrong on something really important.
 
I think chat would have been a better place for that, but I didn’t want to put them through the bureaucracy of “gEt 20 ReP fIrSt”
 
Wait, didn't you say on the original question that they're readily available and free to download?
@orthocresol I think you can grant them write permission without 20 rep.
 
andselisk did. Sometimes, supporting information is open access. In this case it wasn’t.
 
Personally, most of this academic pay firewall seemed like B.S. to me
But I'm not still well-versed with academia anyway
I might find so much B.S. it'd sound legit.
 
There’s enough BS in academia to last a lifetime
 
9:49 AM
That is some high-grade B.S.! Can I burn it as coal?
 
Yes. That would put me out of a job, but also obviate my need for a job.
 
You burn bullshit for a living?
 
Close enough.
 
10:16 AM
-2
Q: do covalent bonds have ions?

Luke KongDo covalent compounds have ions? There is a question in my textbook: Ions are particles that exist a) only in water solutions b) in some crystals c) in polar covalent compounds d) in covalent compounds that are not polar I chose C, but B is the correct answer... isn't HCl a counter-exma...

These stupid examiners -___-
I feel bad for the OP
I VTC'd as unclear. I guess. We can't answer your question because it's not answerable because it's idiotic.
 
 
4 hours later…
2:19 PM
AHAHHHAHA I gained an ultimate weapon
 
Nah, it's just for the hat. ;-)
 
Tbf, I probably shouldn't have posted that, so I was probably wrong.
But the hat did provide some consolation.
0
A: Which chemicals apply on copper metal it attract rice

Rk003There are no chemicals to attract rice to copper

 
Eeesh.
Proof that if you leave crap stay open, it'll attract more crap.
So I guess we just discovered what chemical attracts crap.
 
It's autocrapalytic?
 
Only if another user posts "no wut u legit dumb both wrong"
 
2:32 PM
Is that a challenge?
 
I dunno, do you have 'peer pressure' on main?
If not then duh
Or you could be the fourth person who comments "noob every1 knwo u use magnet basic science -- jully jilly, oxfor studen"
Wait, you do/did study at Oxford. It'd be weird
 
 
1 hour later…
3:44 PM
2
Q: How to deal constructively with questions that have a severe problem in grammar/vocabulary

KarlMany a question asked here is barely understandable, and it seems we're very reluctant to point this out, obviously because it's hard to do so in a polite and helpful manner, without knowing about the background of an OP. Such questions then usually get ignored or closed as "unclear", which is n...

 
3:58 PM
This is a bit like a chameleon question. Since there were no answers; however, it doesn't matter.
 
4:38 PM
So, copper metal has a brown color, indicating that it reflects red light and absorbs green and blue light. Copper compounds, on the other hand, tend to reflect green and blue and absorb red.
Is there an explanation for why copper compounds tend to reflect the same frequencies that copper metal absorbs? Or is it pretty much a coincidence?
 
 
3 hours later…
7:33 PM
@TannerSwett Coincidence AFAIK. Of course, there is an explanation for each
Hmm, what was I here to do again?
Oh, right.
I agree with you. — Gaurang Tandon 5 hours ago
Worst. Counter-argument. Evar. @Gau
Done. I feel fulfilled.
 
7:52 PM
I believe we can discuss this more effectively if you come to chat. — M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ 3 mins ago
chirp chirp chirp
Eager anticipation.
There's so many things to talk about in that answer that I could another answer about it.
 
That's sort of the problem with these discussions
 
@orthocresol Now I can write an answer about that remark
We could hold a chat event and discuss it to death
But you'd realize chat can get pretty messy.
 
Yes, very much so.
 
8:55 PM
@ortho @Mart @Gau in case you wanted to chip in,
 

« first day (2592 days earlier)      last day (1781 days later) »