« first day (1643 days earlier)      last day (2732 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
12:54 AM
Does anyone know how to disable the site's custom keyboard shortcuts for inside text boxes? For example, Ctrl+B inserts **strong text**, and I want it to stop.
I guess if it's in a single JS file I can block it, though I'd prefer a setting somewhere.
 
 
2 hours later…
getafix
getafix
3:03 AM
Hullo o/
 
1,3-feeds
1,3-feeds
3:28 AM
0
Q: Is it a bad idea to have an edit only be the addition of the homework tag?

pentavalentcarbonOften when cruising the latest questions or working through the review queue, I'll make an edit that only adds homework. I see two problems, the first very minor, the second potentially insidious. Is this too minor of an edit? Is it safe to make the assumption that a post is homework? I argu...

discussion tags editing homework
 
 
4 hours later…
user228700
7:11 AM
Hey everyone :-)
 
user228700
Quick question; we don't see "anti-aromatic compounds" in the "classification of organic compounds" tree diagram.
 
user228700
Is this because the same reason that Zhe was talking about 'sterday?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
8:45 AM
@pentavalentcarbon There is a setting, if I am not wrong. meta.stackexchange.com/q/237166/312770
 
Anonymous
9:06 AM
What does NaBH4 form with 3 degree alkyl halide?
 
Anonymous
Any idea someone?
 
Anonymous
@orthocresol
 
Anonymous
@Zhe
 
Anonymous
@pentavalentcarbon
 
Anonymous
@pH13-YetanotherPhilipp
 
Anonymous
9:08 AM
i need major product
 
Anonymous
@Kaumudi Those compounds dont exist normally
 
Anonymous
@orthocresol
 
Anonymous
What does NaBH4 form with 3 degree alkyl halide?
 
Anonymous
alkene?
 
Anonymous
or alkane?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
9:12 AM
Please don't spam ping.
 
Anonymous
I got too excited
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
I don't know if it even reacts.
Well as a rule of thumb don't bother people unless it's important.
 
Anonymous
Well its important
 
Anonymous
as I'm writing an answer
 
Anonymous
cant find any reference
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
9:14 AM
Important enough to ping everybody in the room?
If you can't find anything, chances are there's no reaction.
 
Anonymous
yes...for me...maybe not for you :-P
 
Anonymous
you can always ignore a ping :-P
 
Anonymous
There must be a reaction...i read it somewhere..cant find it now
 
Anonymous
either an alkene or an alkane is formed
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Go and look it up then, I don't know. And I know that I sound grumpy, but real life doesn't work this way. People don't like being disturbed with things that aren't important to them.
Ping one person if you really want, but don't spam everybody in the room
It's just courtesy.
 
DHMO
DHMO
9:47 AM
@Kaumudi you also don't see carboylic acids
 
Anonymous
10:37 AM
@orthocresol Maybe you are grumpy in real life too :-P !...btw when I am not able to solve any problem I keep calling up friends and teachers till I get an answer :-). Call me what you want...but I'm not gonna give up that attitude...and btw if people here are uncomfortable with just getting a ping...I will not ping multiple users from now onwards if that makes you happy . Cya.
 
getafix
getafix
@o-cresol I used the latex table today in one of my posts. It looks so good haha. I am so glad you edited that into my answer haha
@S007 nobody likes spam pings, man
 
Anonymous
@getafix I have a habit of pinging to draw attention. Maybe chat is not for me. I used to think this is a lively discussion forum where people love to ask and to answer and to discuss. But I am disappointed with the reaction. Again, I am sorry if I have irritated someone. I will avoid chat from now on.
 
DHMO
DHMO
@S007 quite a pessimistic step to avoid chat at all just because of one unpleasant moment
 
Anonymous
@DHMO Sorry, but really I did not enjoy the chat-room. Doesn't suit me maybe :-) Oh btw not just "one unpleasant moment". Anyway see you on the main site. Bbye!
 
user228700
10:54 AM
@DHMO Hm, yes...
 
user228700
@S007 It is. Just not all of the time. I usually wait around for around a day (at most) to get answers. In the meantime, this delay prompts me to try again and again to sometimes figure it out on my own!
 
user228700
@S007 Well, the difference b/w calling up friends is that they too often gain from the experience. Here, on the other hand, people have separate lives and I do imagine that perhaps it is a little annoying to ping. It's simply a courtesy. Please don't give up on chat simply due to this. This place lights up like a Christmas tree sometimes and we have very good discussions :-)
 
user228700
In any case, ur call. All the best! Bye :-)
 
Anonymous
It's not the delay that I am complaining about. The problem is the "don't disturb us attitude" even though I pinged only those users were online. Well, okay I won't ping anyone ever again here on chat.
 
user228700
Ah, I see. Like I said, I guess it's just courtesy.
 
DHMO
DHMO
11:02 AM
@S007 you pinged all of the users online
 
Anonymous
I felt that some really good organic chem guys are online...let me ping them to draw attention...i did'nt expect such a retaliation...btw not pinging is a courtesy ? They should remove it in that case
 
Anonymous
DHMO yes I did
 
user228700
I think it's OK to ping one person at a time. Eg: I often ping John Rennie at The h Bar because we have great discussions and he doesn't at all mind it.
 
Anonymous
What is wrong in pinging 3-4 users at a time ? Courtesy ? I do not see how.
 
Anonymous
They should remove multiple ping feature in that case
 
Anonymous
11:04 AM
If the feature is there it is meant to be used.
 
user228700
In fact, I think it's safe to say that he enjoys teaching me :-) I digress. The point is that yes, courtesy. Let me explain very quickly.
 
DHMO
DHMO
@S007 not everyone is here to teach you organic chemistry
 
user228700
Yes, that ^
 
user228700
The people here have different lives. Not everybody is preparing for JEE.
 
Anonymous
DHMO of course no one is here to teach me org...in school my friends are not there to teach me org...i just ask them if they know and if they have time they explain
 
user228700
11:06 AM
By pinging them, we are requesting them to answer us. This is what is perhaps frowned upon.
 
Anonymous
No one is requesting them to answer...that is a wrong notion
 
user228700
They have no obligation to answer our queries and we must wait to see if anybody will eventually clear them.
 
Anonymous
It's not like I'm holding them at gun point asking them to answer
 
Anonymous
they can answer if they are free
 
Anonymous
When did I say they have an obligation ?
 
user228700
11:08 AM
Not really. See, if they are online, it means they have seen ur question. If they haven't replied, it means they aren't free. It's as simple as that.
 
Anonymous
No. If they are online they might not have seen my question if they are on the main site
 
Anonymous
they might be doing some other stuff and later when they come back they might never spot my question
 
user228700
See, I myself have no problem if people ping me. But for other people, it is apparently disturbing. So I resort to patiently waiting. It's not like I can't do anything else while I wait!
 
Anonymous
My question may be hidden by a dozen other messages ...that's the reason I pinged
 
Anonymous
You are not getting my point
 
Anonymous
11:10 AM
Pinging is to make them aware that my question exists
 
user228700
Yes, about the hiding?
 
user228700
Have u seen the frequency of messages here? :-P
 
Anonymous
The frequency keeps varying throughout the day..sometimes reaching 30 messages per minute and sometimes 1 message in an hour
 
user228700
Anyway, I think that Orthocresol will be able to add to this conversation better. I do understand ur point but since I have no problems when people ping me, I don't get it that much either.
 
user228700
Since Orthocresol insists that it is spam, she/he will be able to tell u why this no pinging business does not really reflect a bad attitude towards learning.
 
Anonymous
11:13 AM
Neither do I. It's better if I avoid chat because our notions don't concur much. See you on the main site .Farewell .
 
user228700
Adios.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
11:36 AM
@Kaumudi I don't mind someone individually pinging me. You've done it many times.
Meh, this is part of why I don't want to moderate.
It's not site policy or anything, just my opinion.
@S007 You are free to ping whoever you like, that is why the function is there. There is no rule forbidding it. If you think it is rude, then don't do it. If you think it isn't, then just continue doing it. I am just pointing out that pinging multiple users at the same time for something that doesn't concern them can very well be considered rude.
I don't want to discuss this anymore. You can do as you wish.
 
user228700
11:54 AM
@orthocresol Yes, I have :-P
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@Kaumudi Unfortunately, I'm a he, by the way..
 
Anonymous
@orthocresol I understand that. Will avoid it in future. I hope you also understand that showing your grumpiness to fonce your opinion (as you were initially trying ) may as well be considered rude by some users. Avoid that. Everyone is different and I respect your opinion too.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Oh nice. A drama.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@S007 Right, yeah, sorry.
@M.A.R. I should shut up more, really.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Well, I read the stuff above.
@S007 you shouldn't ping random people in a room en masse.
Ortho is right, and he's not being grumpy at all.
Imagine what happened if you entered a meeting of chemistry teachers, and poked everyone so they answered your question.
That not good? So the same applies here.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
12:04 PM
Eh, to be fair, I am. I do stand by what I said, but it probably could have been a bit nicer.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
It's not good to ping a lot of people.
ESPECIALLY if it's to get attention on one of the main site posts, yours or not.
 
Anonymous
He himself said he is sounding grumpy if you care to read his messages. BTW the question I asked was in chat itself. Not on main site.
 
Anonymous
I just pinged the guys online so that they notice the question in chat which may later on be hidden by other messages
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@S007 HIS being grumpy or not has nothing to do with what YOU shouldn't do.
@S007 And I'm asking you not to repeat it.
And that's only to avoid future drama.
 
Anonymous
Forcing your opinion by showing your grumpiness is considered rude by me
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
12:07 PM
@Kaumudi You don't. Others might.
@S007 Enforcing rules, rudely or not, is not wrong.
I don't either.
Heck, Jan mass-pinged me the other day.
And I frequent in another room infamous for its 'ping attacks' on regular users.
But if someone gets annoyed because you pinged them for no reason, you're at fault.
 
Anonymous
Rules ? Which rule ? It'seems not a site policy. Btw stop being the moral police here . I did not violate any rule
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@S007 The implied chat rules.
 
Anonymous
Multi pinging is not against the rules
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@M.A.R. should probably disengage.
 
Anonymous
Where are the chat rules written ?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
12:09 PM
Most chat rules are written in the minds of the regulars.
 
Anonymous
Don't try to make your own rules here .
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
If you want to keep chatting, please adhere to the rules.
@S007 It's against social rules.
Did you read what I said above?
3 hours ago, by orthocresol
It's just courtesy.
 
Anonymous
Which rules ? Social rules ? Lol...in the minds ? Sorry I don't think anything like that can be written in someone's mind....and it is also a courtesy not to force false rules
 
Anonymous
And seriously stop the stupid chat...i'm fed up...bye
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@S007 Have you ever seen a rule about not hitting your head against a wall? No? That's because that's something you just SHOULDN'T do.
You can't say that 'because it's not documented, I'm gonna hit a wall with my head.'
You're EXPECTED not to hit a wall with your head.
 
Anonymous
12:12 PM
I think you have zero knowledge of politics and constitution...not hurting someone is written in the constitution of your country...Iran....you want a link ?
 
Anonymous
Hurting physically is a crime
 
Anonymous
Stop giving stupid arguments
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
OK, I just need to enjoy my lunch. Just letting you know that next time you mass-ping people, I'm going to kick you. May this be a warning.
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
Now you are being rude.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
12:14 PM
What does that have to do with anything?
 
Anonymous
Please read the constitution of iran that hurting physically is a crime
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@S007 No, I'm just warning you. If you don't follow the rules, you get kicked out.
33 secs ago, by M.A.R.
What does that have to do with anything?
I'm thinking there is language barrier here.
You didn't fully understand what I said.
I am a room owner.
→ 1 message moved to Trash
Mind the language.
 
Anonymous
You can't say that 'because it's not documented, I'm gonna hit a wall with my head.' Suicide is a crime
 
Anonymous
Mind your language.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@S007 Yes, exactly. So you can't say 'because it's not documented, I'm gonna ping as many people as I want'.
You can't mass-ping.
It's against the social rules.
Just like how hitting your head is.
 
Anonymous
12:17 PM
I can say.And you are not the police here. If you can try to kick me out. But sorry I can't stoop to your level of indecency.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
I AM the police here.
 
Anonymous
Hitting your head is against the laws
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
I am the room owner of this room.
 
Anonymous
Not multi pinging
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Bye bye.
Well, room info oneboxed into room link. It shouldn't do that.
Hmm, let's see
Darn it.
 
Anonymous
12:20 PM
F
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Well, well... can we clear this up?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@orthocresol Clear what?
I don't think it's particularly messy up there.
Just a user not knowing what words to use.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Drama ;)
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Anyway, leave them since I have to write a meta.SE FR or bug report or whatever
Asking the right links to be oneboxed
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
→ 2 messages moved to Trash
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
12:33 PM
Well, they might have gotten flagged. Good move.
0
Q: Why do these frustrated Lewis pairs stop working?

Arabian Knight I'm a bit unsure of why these frustrated lewis pairs stop working in two instances: 1)When the groups on phosphorus are changed from 2,4,6-Me3C6H2 to Ph why is a polymer formed? 2)When the phosphorus donor atom is changed from P to N the compound reacts with H2 but is irreversible but when P is...

inorganic-chemistry lewis-structure
"frustrated Lewis pairs"
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
That is the name for them :D
They want to react in a Lewis acid-base fashion, but are too sterically hindered.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Well never heard of them
 
DHMO
DHMO
Is "frustrated" obviously a self-censorship of "fucking"?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
12
Q: Predicting relative solubilites of salts without Ksp values

user223679Is there a way of comparing which salt is more soluble without knowing their $ K_{sp}$ data or performing experiments? For example, comparing $\ce{Hg2Cl2}$ and $\ce{Cr2(SO4)3}$. I am not sure but can I compare lattice and hydration energy relatively or the ion size and estimate? Experim...

inorganic-chemistry solubility theoretical-chemistry
This one needs a good answer.
@DHMO What? O.O
Not everything is censored.
 
user228700
Omg so much drama! :-o
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
12:40 PM
Um....
 
DHMO
DHMO
@M.A.R. self-censorship meaning you censor it yourself
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@Kaumudi Sorry about the drama :D
 
DHMO
DHMO
@Kaumudi indeed
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@DHMO no of course not
 
user228700
@M.A.R. Ik. That's why I've never "mass pinged".
 
DHMO
DHMO
12:41 PM
@M.A.R. ?
 
user228700
@orthocresol :-P
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
To me, it comes off as "my stuff is important, everybody look at it and answer me"
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@DHMO That's like saying I'm self-censoring 'effing cream' and say 'facial cream' instead
 
DHMO
DHMO
@M.A.R. yes?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Judging by the ridicule of that example you should be able to find out that it's NOT self-censoring.
 
user228700
12:42 PM
@orthocresol Yeah, even before being aware of the fact that people get annoyed for mass pinging, I didn't because it did come off like that.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Oh well... next time I will just be more careful. Not a normal user anymore.
 
user228700
Hey, for the record, u didn't come across as too grumpy or anything.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Oct 15 at 11:13, by Loong
user image
This will never not be relevant.
 
user228700
:-P Oh, well...
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
^^
 
DHMO
DHMO
12:44 PM
@Kaumudi do you come with a question?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@orthocresol Nah, don't be too hard on yourself. The only thing to blame for the semi-drama above is the language barrier.
Been there, done that.
 
user228700
@DHMO: Not today, my friend :-P Why, are u bored?
 
DHMO
DHMO
@Kaumudi yes and no
 
user228700
*Not right now.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@DHMO I'll give you a question.
 
user228700
12:45 PM
Maybe I'll come back later with one...
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Kaumudi I don't even know how to achieve that with markdown
 
DHMO
DHMO
*Not right now.
*Not **right now**.
 
user228700
@M.A.R. What's "markdown"?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
How do you rationalise the fact that the equilibrium constants for the reactions $\ce{2A <=> A2}$ and $\ce{4A <=> 2A2}$ are different?
@Kaumudi the fancy formatting syntax, like *xxx* for italics and **yyy** for bold
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Kaumudi The formatting thing you use to embolden or capitalize stuff here or on the main site.
 
DHMO
DHMO
12:48 PM
@orthocresol the former forward reaction means that two molecules of $\ce{A}$ combine to form one molecule of $\ce{A2}$
different mechanism
 
user228700
@M.A.R. Oh. It's the same as when u post questions...
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Yes, I know.
But you manage to make it not work in an exciting way.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@DHMO But mechanism shouldn't affect the position of equilibrium, it's obviously the same reaction, no? Just one scaled by a factor of 2.
 
DHMO
DHMO
@orthocresol the equilibrium constant is not the position of equilibrium
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
ah, great
 
DHMO
DHMO
12:49 PM
at the position of equilibrium, the constants are still different but the expressions yield the same value
@orthocresol so i passed the test? :D
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Hmm... well... sort of, I guess.
 
DHMO
DHMO
yay
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
The eqm constant reflects the position of eqm, in the sense that if eqm goes to the right, then eqm constant will increase
But it's not a quantitative reflection,
 
DHMO
DHMO
I see
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
so even though both reactions have the same position of eqm in the sense that the % of reactants consumed will be the same, the resulting eqm constants are different
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
12:51 PM
Are we asking, or are we answering?
Or maybe I'm seeing everyone as Orthocresol.
 
DHMO
DHMO
@M.A.R. he's testing me
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Too bad I can't edit usernames in chat.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@orthocresol Well, you technically can.
 
user228700
@DHMO How does mechanism affect the equilibrium constant? Mechanism only affects the kinetics of the reaction, right?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@M.A.R. Trudat. I could
@M.A.R. It's actually pretty complicated, this question.
 
DHMO
DHMO
12:56 PM
@Kaumudi It's actually pretty complicated, this question.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@orthocresol Mhm
Someone should put it on Dainty Bounce.
 
user228700
The equilibrium constant gives a measure of how many moles of product we gain compared to how many we lose...
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
I'm really inclined to say it's not possible.
 
user228700
That's basically it, right?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Theoretically, the eqm constant only depends on the relative stability of reactants and products. It doesn't care how the reactant gets to the product (the mechanism).
 
user228700
12:57 PM
^
 
user228700
That's what I learnt too.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Note the adverb in the beginning.
'potentially', 'theoretically' etc. indicate that you're missing out on a lot of fun.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
So, you could change the conditions under which a reaction is run, and that would affect the relative stability, e.g. by solvent-solute interactions. It may also affect the mechanism. So, both the eqm cst and the mechanism may change at the same time.
However, it wouldn't be right to conclude from that that it's the change in mechanism that is affecting the eqm cst.
I'd be inclined to agree that mechanism doesn't affect the eqm cst.
Might be wrong, been wrong many times, so...
@M.A.R. I could, but then that would make me write an answer...
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Blasphemy
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
I do have some stuff to write about it, but it's a rather long answer and I probably only have time over the weekend.
 
user228700
1:04 PM
@orthocresol Huh. Are u still a student?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@Kaumudi of course, it's the only reason why I am able to be here so often
Once I stop being a student, I will be gone. :(
 
user228700
Oh, OK. And yeah, my brain kept thinking u were female, sorry :-P
 
user228700
@orthocresol Oh :/ When will that be? Wait, why do u have to be gone?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
He is a girl inside
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Tomorrow.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
1:07 PM
NEXT MISSION: Stop Ortho's graduation.
 
user228700
@orthocresol U're kidding, right? U're actually graduating tomorrow?!
 
pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
pssssshhhhhhh we will always be students of chemistry, whether we like it or not
 
user228700
^
 
user228700
So wait, is that what u meant @orthocresol? Or are u really gonna stop coming here starting t'row?
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Nah, I'm just kidding.
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
1:09 PM
Hello just kidding
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
I'm fully expecting the "Hi kidding, I'm M.A.R."
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Please capitalize names properly just kidding.
@orthocresol There's a reason dad trolling is the best trolling
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
@M.A.R. You saw penta's meta post? @everybody @else @in @the @room
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@orthocresol Yeah, I'm gonna write an answer after I take a nap.
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
Ok, enjoy your nap
 
user228700
1:35 PM
@orthocresol Phew.
 
getafix
getafix
2:48 PM
Oh wow
That was intense haha
 
Zhe
Zhe
WTH happened here?! I'm glad we have mods...
 
DHMO
DHMO
@Zhe a user pinged everyone which caused an intense argument
 
Zhe
Zhe
I'm just catching up with the scrollback
 
orthocresol
orthocresol
3:08 PM
All the mods are away, so I'm left to wreak havoc here.
 
Aaron Abraham
Aaron Abraham
3:58 PM
Physical chemistry anyone? :3
0
Q: Doubt regarding Miscibility curves

Aaron AbrahamI stumbled across 'Miscibility Curves' in the section Solubility of Liquids in Liquids ( Organic Chemistry, by Wallwork and Grant ) today. Now I'm not sure if it's an issue with way the content was laid out in the book, or whether it's due to my 'shortcomings' as a high-schooler, but I feel the b...

physical-chemistry solutions mixtures
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
4:52 PM
I would've answered the peta most, but Jan did it well.
And in a Janny way
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
5:26 PM
0
Q: One-box is messing with my URL

M.A.R.Not sure if this is a bug or a feature, but if I link to specific sections of a Wikipedia article such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry, the link will look like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry#Molecule where "Molecule" is the section I'm linking to. However, when this one-boxes,...

bug chat onebox
@AaronAbraham You have a question, not a doubt
Since you can't count doubts.
 
Zhe
Zhe
5:44 PM
@orthocresol How are you so fast?
 
Vedant
Vedant
6:30 PM
@M.A.R. ???
it works fine!]
or they fixed it :p
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Vedant The info works fine, but it oneboxes as a link to the room
 
Vedant
Vedant
what do you mean by oneboxes??
@M.A.R. redirects??
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
No.
One-boxes are chat features that change links into something bigger.
For instance, if I leave a link to chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/61574/… as the only text in the message, it turn into
-1
Q: aromaticity for compound with n=0 in huckel number

sheogorathWhen n=0 in huckel number (4n+2) then 2 pie electron will be able to give aromaticity. Cyclopropanyl cation containing ring less than 5 member show aromaticity having 2 pie electron being delocalised . The problem is cylcobutenyl cation can also have 2 pie electron but cannot show resonance. Ho...

organic-chemistry
 
Vedant
Vedant
isnt it supposed to do that??
or did you watn a method to disable that??]
hey @M.A.R. actally i am answerring another question of yours, that you asked on the meta
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Vedant When I link to a room info page, it incorrectly oneboxes as a link to the room
@Vedant O.o The policy on AMIRITE?
 
Vedant
Vedant
6:38 PM
yup that must be a bug
@M.A.R. Oh soory nothing disregard that message
@M.A.R. BUt you are correct its one-boxing to the chat page
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Vedant in order to avoid downvotes, please inform me of what you're going to post.
 
Vedant
Vedant
what downvotes??
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Since it gets some time to get familiar with what meta is about, it's not uncommon at all for the newer meta users to write something that gets loads of downvotes.
 
Vedant
Vedant
but i didnt post anything on meta!!
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
Aren't you going to?
 
Vedant
Vedant
6:42 PM
nope!
should i?
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
No, was just asking
0
A: Calcium carbonate and vinegar

jorge RosasWhat amount of dilution did you use for the vinegar? Make trials using less and less dilution each time, taking into account as well that the acetic acid content in the vinegar can be low. You can record that way the starting time and completion time for the reaction vs. vinegar dilution.

Ideas on this answer?
 
Vedant
Vedant
ok !!!!! he should have writtenit as a comment!
 
Mithoron
Mithoron
@M.A.R. o/
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Mithoron \o You're back to your old avatar!
 
Mithoron
Mithoron
@M.A.R. Well, for quite some time
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
6:48 PM
0
A: Chemical to remove nail polish but retain ink

Juliana Karasawa SouzaIt would depend mainly on the chemical composition of the ink (permanent marker? standard ballpoint?) If it was signed with standard ballpoint, you have a problem, because the main film forming / thickening agent used for ballpoint pen ink is the same used in the majority of nail polishes - nitr...

What about this one?
@Mithoron It's only right now for me.
 
Vedant
Vedant
137
A: Why do I need an IoC container as opposed to straightforward DI code?

Joel SpolskyI'm with you, Vadim. IoC containers take a simple, elegant, and useful concept, and make it something you have to study for two days with a 200-page manual. I personally am perplexed at how the IoC community took a beautiful, elegant article by Martin Fowler and turned it into a bunch of complex...

 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Vedant ?
 
Mithoron
Mithoron
 
M.A.R.
M.A.R.
@Mithoron Oh
How come I missed that.
It can't possibly be because I'm not paying attention ever.
 
Mithoron
Mithoron
@M.A.R. You're probably so used to this one that you forgot I had others :D
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (1643 days earlier)      last day (2732 days later) »