This question is entirely about opinion and cannot have any one definite answer. Why has it not been closed?
Subjects to discuss while on break with older colleagues
@RicharU they are been recount because the number of votes don't match the total of the vote counted afterwards. From what I red until now, this hasn't been showned/proved on the other states YET.
In any case, @RichardU, at this point I am asking you to read back over your recent message to me and consider they they might have been needlessly hostile considering I was speaking to MaskedMan and ESPECIALLY considering our history. Please.
As I see it, facility management in the context of a workplace concerns itself with creating, operating and maintaining commercial environments and infrastructure. In an office context I believe the term "building management" is largely synonymous.
So are questions about this topic considered s...
I disagree. A simple answer could be something like "Read 'How to make great stuff' by Some Dude.'" or "Check out this acme.com, it is full of good info on this topic"
Since the question asks for resources and not advice?
Edit: After some discussion, the best answer seems to be to decide on a case-by case basis whether or not something veers too close to "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies".
As IDrinkAndIKnowThings points out in their answer and in chat: Even if a qu...
I've edited my answer, maybe it will get a better reception now (Today has been a bad day for me and down-votes)
@DoritoStyle you are mistaking brevity for hostility. I cited the Pew research center and encouraged you to check the data yourself so that you can see for yourself. I'm not out to convince you but to encourage you to rely on your own abilities. You shouldn't take my word for it, or accept a list of links as fact, you should investigate for yourself.
I would like this question to be re-opened.
Threatened to resign, accused of being a bully
Multiple users answered the question with varying degrees of commentary.
It does contain a question. The story was necessary to give the context in which the question was asked. If I need to reword it,...
I just read one of those long articles where they say "run, don't walk" if your employer has any of these policies in place. A previous employer (the one I had a stroke from all the stress) had every last one.
@RichardU "mistaking brevity for hostility" Those two aren't really the same, and in this case I don't think that is what you have done. Thanks for responding and considering my point, but I don't consider that little back and forth we just had to be constructive or pleasant. Your move about how it goes next time.
---- Regarding your other point, you "cited" a company and not a study. In what sort of debate does that count as a source? :)
If you're not willing to provide sources when making claims, then you aren't really giving a good faith effort to civil productive discussion here. Maybe that was never your intent, but it was my assumption that you wanted to discuss a point, not that you were ranting.
@DoritoStyle I have no animosity towards you. Assume good intent. The Pew research center put out a detailed report on serious flaws in the voter roles, a simple Google search on Pew and two million registered dead voters will give you all the information you need. I'm not putting in any effort to discuss this because I am not interested in proving anything. You can see for yourself, and you should.
@DoritoStyle When I was young, I was an outright ass, and I fell for everything. My attitude towards you is in an effort to help you avoid some of the same mistakes.
I also realize that clinging to policy is a bit off-putting, but growing up in the age of reddit has led me to believe that enforcing boundaries is the only thing that ensures a community remains in-check and useful.
Hmm, I'm more prone to rely on community & debate than mods or authority. Idealistic maybe, but I think there's a useful balance that can be achieved between our two methods.
Stack Exchange has, so far, offered me a refuge in a sea of crap on the internet, so I'm pretty motivated to defending the existing parts I value so much.
@RichardU what you are describing is a very good motivation, but I must admit that your track record of remembering those goals in the heat of the moment has left me a bit bemused. You have often resorted to criticizing my character or putting words in my mouth. For all the times you've quoted a logical fallacy at me, I feel you offered your own in return.
I genuinely hope we can move past those issues (I also realize that your medical condition provides extra challenge here) . Bickering brings me nothing but stress.
Thanks, I mean it. I don't really want you to moderate your tone by the way, I have thicker skin than that at least. It's only your tactics that sometimes "get my goat" so to speak.
Lord knows my tone isn't always angelic, but I try to let logic constrain my methods when I can remember to.