Of course it's the same one! That barn has become iconic Doctor-on-Gallifrey. The War Doctor went there in Day of the Doctor, then Clara went there in Listen, and now Twelve in Hell Bent.
> WOMAN: You, up there! You're not supposed to be there! I've just put all that back. It's for the boys, if any of them ever want to come > (Then she sees his face, and realises who it is. He nods.) > WOMAN: They'll kill you.
@randal'thor Mark Gatiss. You may know him best as Mycroft.
He was also Richard Lazarus in a Tenth Doctor story.
He was also at least two other Doctor Who characters. And he was in Jekyll, and Game of Thrones, and Midsomer Murders, and Poirot, Sense and Sensibility, Being Human, George Gently... he gets around.
Yeah, Gatiss and Moffat have been part of Doctor Who productions since the Wilderness Years.
(If you haven't seen The Curse of Fatal Death, look it up. Should be on YouTube. It's a charity event, and Moffat's first script for Doctor Who. While it's terribly funny, it's also a distillation of all the quirks and foibles he'd bring to the show proper.)
Watching it now that Moffat's been show runner for several years... a lot of what seemed like over-the-top parody then is now just "Yeah, they did that a couple seasons ago."
@BESW Moffat-isms are the worse thing about Doctor Who right now. Episodes that don't use them? Instant classics, like 'Heaven Sent'. Episodes that do? Tripe, like 'The Magician's Apprentice'.
@DrRDizzle I think there's nothing inherently wrong with most of Moffat's Moffatyness. It's just been repeated so much that we're sick of it.
And Moffat himself is running out of fun new ways to do it.
I mean, if we look as far back as The Doctor Dances, Blink, and Silence in the Library, they're rife with Moffatisms. But they're some of the best beloved stories of the RTD era.
@BESW Depends what you class as a Moffat-ism. For me, it's his inability to let a moment happen naturally and his tendency to base an episode around fan service.
Using the TARDIS to mess with causality; the Doctor's sexuality as a major theme; the Doctor getting tired of fighting evil; the Master and the Doctor getting chummy; a chronic inability to write women well...
@BESW But when he's on form, none of these things matter (beyond his inability to write women, but that's another matter entirely). All I ever want from a Moffat episode is spooks, and he is fairly good at delivering when it matters.
Looking at Curse of Fatal Death, we see the seeds of River Song; Missy; the Eleventh Doctor's trying to make the universe forget about him; all of Moffat's playing around with causality to mess with the narrative (Blink, River Song, Big Bang Two, etc)...
Moffat does do atmosphere quite well, and when he can avoid explaining things he does tension very well too.
I'm not saying all of those things are bad.
Just that he repeats them so often that we start to see the seams in his stories too much, we're tired of the same "Why is this woman unusual?" plot prompt over and over and over...
@BESW I don't think he ever should have been showrunner though. I've liked season nine more than any of his other seasons by a fair amount, but in my eyes Doctor Who doesn't need the kind of character development and long(er) form storytelling that Moffat has bought to the table.
(That's one thing we don't get in Curse, which is interesting to note.)
@DrRDizzle I agree, but Moffat didn't start that. Russell did, albeit less aggressively and more clumsily, and it's an inevitable result of restarting Doctor Who in a post-Buffy TV space.
Season and multi-season story arcs with planned-out character development were experimented with even in the closing years of Classic Who, and after the success of Buffy it became something every network felt was necessary to try for most long-running shows.
As much as I think Moffat isn't very good at it, and that Doctor Who doesn't need it, I can't blame him for including season arcs in the show.
@BESW Aye, but there is a big difference in my mind between the subtle set up required for the Bad Wolf story and an entire season of The Doctor running around trying to prevent being shot by an astronaut which later turns out to be both his wife and the child of his companions.
The Impossible Astronaut storyline is a good example of what I think is both best and worst about Moffat: he's a fan and always has been. He's been thinking about Doctor Who for most of his life, speculating and mulling and plotting. So he's got a TON of well-developed ideas about what Doctor Who can be.
When he was writing for Davies, Moffat was using the best ideas from decades of careful fannish contemplation.
As he went on, we can see that he was getting more ambitious... and also slowly running out of the really great ideas.
So then Moffat started using some of the less-great or less-well-developed ideas. Or recycling the successful ones.
Most of Eleven and Twelve, until this season, have risen out of responses to Classic Who.
That's pretty great for some of the old fans, to see the show in dialogue with itself, rebutting some themes and building on others. And it's introduced new fans to a lot of cool old stuff.
But I think one reason series 9 is clicking with people so well is that New Who is now talking to New Who.
Series 9 is in direct correspondence with the RTD era.
@BESW See, that's something I wouldn't pick up on, but Eleven is still easily my least favourite Doctor thanks to the significant drop in quality that the average Doctor Who episode saw when he took over. If that's down to Moffat relying on a knowledge of Classic Who in order to fully appreciate what he is doing, that makes sense.
@BESW Then it also makes sense why season nine would have been my favourite since Moffat took over.
@BESW I can see the links here within the context of the show, but logically I still don't really understand why one of them needed their memory wiped.
And that's often why I find myself left cold by Moffat - he does things for thematic reasons regardless of if they actually make sense a lot of the time.
I said something a while back... [goes to dig it up]
Bah, can't find it right now.
Anyway, that's why the Doctor needed his memory erased.
RTD and Davies have both been fascinated with the balancing act of the idea that the Doctor needs his companions to remind him of how to be a Good Man. It's supported since the early days of the First Doctor, but never made explicit until New Who.
The idea is that... somehow... Twelve is broken by and because of Clara.
That unlike Rose, who healed Nine enough that Ten could let her go (although RTD couldn't), Twelve's too attached to Clara to stay Good in the face of her leaving him.
So she... somehow... meddled with his memory so that the fixing stayed in place without the attachment.
@BESW See, I'm sure that there are ways that could have worked within the context of the show, but it simply didn't at least from a logical perspective.
I kind of feel that Doctor Who is too into itself at the moment. Like the last two James bond films, we're in the position where the show is (in general) too preoccupied with examining itself to really just be the show that I want it to be.
So if he keeps the Doctor and Clara apart, makes the Doctor live with the consequences of getting back on Gallifrey's bad side, and moves forward to new things, I can be okay with this as yet another "Grand Moffat Climax That Made No Sense."
@DrRDizzle Oh, man, Spectre felt like they got a parody script and didn't notice.
@BESW I actually quite liked parts of Spectre, but as a film it was a bit bum - partly because it was pretty much the exact same story as (but less fun than) the significantly better Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation.
You know what I want from season ten of Doctor Who more than anything? A companion who just enjoys traveling with a Doctor who just wants to help people across space and time.
Less 21st century England, more wacko alien planets that we've never seen before and will never see again.
@DrRDizzle I've seen the first... three films? And I much prefer the TV show to all of them. It's not an action-adventure film, it's more like Spy MacGyver with a really strong faith in the audience's intelligence.
The show always starts with the lead and the audience hearing the goal of the mission, and then the team has a briefing where the audience learns only bits and pieces of the plan, like what gadgets they have.
@BESW Then you might not like the other Mission: Impossible films to be honest. They are less Spy MacGyver and more Stunt MacC***. Awesome and thrilling and surprisingly well written, but not particularly smart.
I'm not against action films, I'm just not really down with hijacking such a great franchise for them instead of making their own Tom Cruise Does Stunts franchise.
I know it's not very popular and it doesn't fit neatly into the continuity of the other films, but I really like Guardians of the Gallifrey.
Anyway, I'd like to see New Who spend more time in periods of Earth history that the BBC doesn't already have sound stages for, and have companions from off-world who aren't obviously alien.
...Actually, y'know what might reasonably happen is another Romana-type companion.
Romana was a Time Lady who got... assigned... to the Fourth Doctor to keep an eye on him and be sure he did the job the Time Lords wanted him to do.
He eventually turned her to his way of thinking and they had adventures together for a while (then they returned to Gallifrey and by the time he was done the Doctor had installed her as Lady High President of Gallifrey, but that's neither here nor there).
It could be pretty cool to have a moderately antagonistic Time Lord/Lady companion for a while.
This is our fantasy, so we'll assume Moffat's not the show-runner anymore.
(He can still write episodes sometimes, but no more than two a season.)
I'd love to just start a season with a random assortment of companions from various times and places, no explanation for how they got there or anything, just BAM ADVENTURES GO.
In the day of the doctor, all the doctors came to save Gallifrey (no sir, all thirteen!). My question is how did all the doctors know to come? Only the three doctors (10,11,8.5) were brought together by the moment, after all. So how did they know?
Notice, please, that "Assimilate" doesn't mean "put a human brain in a robot body which can still act autonomously without the brain." I have no idea who thought that was a good change for New Who to make.
The basic concept is that Cybermen don't convert willy-nilly. They only convert people they think are worthy. Toberman's strength is an acceptable quality to justify at least partial conversion, and is useful for their current situation.
But yeah, I love a lot of the Seventh Doctor's stuff. Curse of Fenric, Remembrance of the Daleks, The Greatest Show in the Galaxy...
He basically had just one companion for his entire era, and she was very much the mould in which New Who companions have been trying to be cast--but failing.