Today I realized that MS teams (ugh) doesn't support sharing the system audio (ugggh). I figured I could (have to) somehow loop back my audio output into input. From my first wave of googling this seems possible, but I haven't come across a straightforward method yet. Ideally I need a setup where in my sound settings I can choose an output-like item among the audio input channels. Does someone have a clear-cut idea how I should approach this?
@FaheemMitha because pretty much everything of substance has been asked, the rest are just variations of smaller pieces. If you read a tutorial and spend 30 minutes googling you can pretty much solve anything, unless it's about cutting-edge technology or something insanely complex (like the C++ standard).
I'm only an end-user of latex. Incidentally I need to solve this audio problem because I recorded a stream of a beamer presentation for a lecture, and I want to stream it in a meeting as a screen share.
@FaheemMitha most people don't ask about the standard per se, that's a very high-brow activity. Most current questions are "why does this code give weird output?" and "why does this do something different than this, when I think both are the same?", and invariably the answer is "this is undefined behaviour [because this and this in the standard]"
Most of the questions don't rise about "why isn't my sound working?".
Sometimes it's "why isn't my mic working?".
@AndrasDeak It's a perfectly reasonable place to ask a question, but you've won't learn much by browsing. There seems to be little interest in the theory.
Well, that's a given when you're solving an obscure problem. I'd have to wade through more common irrelevant problems anywhere. But now I have e.g. unix.stackexchange.com/questions/82259/…
Well, that's a given when you're solving an obscure problem. I'd have to wade through more common irrelevant problems anywhere. But now I have e.g. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/82259/how-to-pipe-audio-output-to-mic-input/82297
My child proccess can't start to work. I need to pass signal and execute readUsual function.
This is a small piece of code:
int main()
{
pid_t pid2 = fork();
if (pid2 < 0)
printf("Can't create child process\n");
else if (pid2==0)
{
//this block never execute
...
I want to handle different signals for the child and for the parent, so calling signal before fork is not an option What did this guy mean by "add synchronization"?
@Kusalananda I agree with the front half of this; I would say "character set" as another term for "bracket expression", but "character class" is a distinct subset
@JohnnyApplesauce I suspect they meant some sort of method to ensure that each step happens in the order it should. "to be sure child process call signal() before it receive the signal"
My child proccess can't start to work. I need to pass signal and execute readUsual function.
This is a small piece of code:
int main()
{
pid_t pid2 = fork();
if (pid2 < 0)
printf("Can't create child process\n");
else if (pid2==0)
{
//this block never execute
...
