« first day (3388 days earlier)      last day (1555 days later) » 

6:30 AM
In case anyone is wondering what happened to Gmane, see lwn.net/Articles/808904
That's Lars' version of the story. According to his version, he's a moron.
Whether that's true or not, of course, it's not possible to say.
But I think at least one thing is clear from this story. Important net services shouldn't be run by individuals.
 
 
7 hours later…
1:56 PM
@FaheemMitha Gucci mane?
 
 
2 hours later…
3:35 PM
@FaheemMitha Unfortunately, it seems the current SE mess (and of course Facebook, and Google, and...) is telling us they shouldn't be run by corporations, and the PIR/.org mess is telling us they shouldn't be run by nonprofits either. Considering current leaders in both of our countries, I doubt they should be run by governments either. Conclusion, important net services shouldn't be run :-(
Distributed, I guess? :-/
 
 
1 hour later…
4:58 PM
@Jesse_b ???
@derobert They should be run by communities, I think. Like Debian.
Of course, Debian is ultimately piggy-backing off the backs of corporations, but it's not a perfect world.
It's a pity someone didn't figure out a way to get Debian to run Gmane. Though I doubt they would be interested - they have enough on their plate.
The "not a perfect world" bit is probably redundant, considering everything that is going on these days...
@derobert If you have time at some point, I'd appreciate assistance (assuming you are so inclined) with my CV. I'd offer to help you with yours, but I doubt you need it.
Not sure what the PIR/.org mess is, though.
 
GMane
 
@Jesse_b Still no idea what you are on about.
 
Probably for the best, he's not very good
 
Oh, Gucci Mane is a person?
 
5:14 PM
Yeah rappers are people too
 
5:31 PM
@FaheemMitha I can't say I'm particularly good at writing them up...
 
6:11 PM
I love awk
| tr '[[:lower:]]' '[[:upper:]]'
 
6:39 PM
I was seeing the conf files in qemu-arch-extra package (Ubuntu). For binfmt_misc entries, what structures are added in :magic field/section?
 
 
4 hours later…
10:24 PM
@Jesse_b Hmm... That ought to change I love awk into I upve apk, but it does not, it uppercases the string.
 
@Kusalananda come at me bro
=)
 
@Jesse_b tr takes stuff like A-Z and [:alnum:], but it seems it also recognises [[:alnum:]].
 
@Jesse_b I get even worse results...
bash: I: command not found
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `|'
:-P
 
I imagined an echo
 
And a backslash at the end of the first message.
 
10:29 PM
awk 'BEGIN{printf "%s\n", toupper("I love awk")}'
 
Great that the first attempt was a syntax error :-) Though my first attempt at any Perl script always is too, so I don't think that means anything.
 
Ah, found it in the standard. tr '[[:lower:]]' '[[:upper:]]' translates to uppercase because the [ and ] are translated to themselves (uselessly) and what's left is the [:lower:] and [:upper:] translation.
 
When I use printf in awk I forget the comma probably 95% of the time
UUO[[]]
 
perl -E 'say "\UI love perl"'
 
awk '{ print toupper }' <<<"I love awk"
 
10:34 PM
awk: cmd. line:1: { print toupper }
awk: cmd. line:1:                 ^ syntax error
 
Eh?
 
oo weird
 
Try nawk
 
it works with mawk but not gawk
 
Fails here too, with both mawk and gawk
 
10:34 PM
Sadface
awk '{ print toupper($0) }' <<<"I love awk" # boooring
 
mawk 1.3.3-20 (Debian) here. Wonder why it works with some versions.
 
I may be wrong about my /usr/bin/awk
ah yeah it's nawk
 
What's nawk?
/usr/bin/awk?
 
my awk that I thought was mawk
 
10:38 PM
I swear I have mawk installed somewhere...
 
Yeah, nawk's toupper takes $0 by default.
 
Debian has gawk installed as nawk... which of course also doesn't work.
 
@derobert That's just wrong.
 
yeah that seems awk(1)ward
 
No nawk is part of the alternatives system
It can point at any awk
 
10:40 PM
Sure, but it's a little weird since that's not the generic name awk.
 
"New awk" may be newer than the original awk, but it's still a particular awk, not gawk.
 
The default is mawk as far as I know
Same applies though
 
Debian has an original-awk package, @Kusalananda that one works with your script
$ original-awk '{ print toupper }' <<<"I love awk"
I LOVE AWK
 
I wonder if it's truly the original, or if it's nawk (a.k.a. "BSD awk").
 
alias bawk=original-awk
 
@derobert Yeah, that seems like the original.
It would probably be installed as oawk on systems that had another default awk, if the traditional naming scheme was in use.
 
11:07 PM
@Kusalananda In debian, actually, nawk points to gawk.
 
@Isaac We've established that just moments ago.
 
38 mins ago, by derobert
Debian has gawk installed as nawk... which of course also doesn't work.
 

« first day (3388 days earlier)      last day (1555 days later) »