« first day (1755 days earlier)      last day (3188 days later) » 

10:23 AM
Good monring day night evening I don't know to all of you
I have a major issue with my memory today
I remeber I saw once a tool on linux a bit like AIDE that keep records of change in configuration file with automated configuration backup
it was something like etchecker
but I can't find it anymore on internet.
I would be glad if any of you had an idea :)
 
10:36 AM
I may be tripwire, but I'm pretty sure there's another one
 
What's your problem with your memory?
Do you want to run a diagnostic?
(I don't know aide nor tripwire)
 
I just don't remember so the problerm is more about my brain memory
because I can't remember.
those two tools run a diagnosys of your system compare your config file with a hash DB and tell's you who and when there have been a change, and I remeber that I found one of this tool tha twas also making a backup of configuration before they are modified
some kind of automated configuration file versionning
 
Hi @Kiwy. Long time no see.
 
@FaheemMitha Hey nice to see you :)
how are you Faheem ?
 
@Kiwy I'm Ok. How are you? How is the (new) job? I think you started a new job recently, right?
 
10:51 AM
@FaheemMitha well That's why you don't see me a lot, I'm completely overloaded but I have a f***ing great job
it's amazing, it's been a year now
 
@Kiwy I still don't have a clue what you need, so I'll drop the ball here...
@Kiwy Unix job?
 
@fab
@Fabby well thanks for trying :)
 
Hi @Kiwy!
You could always ask on Software Recommendations
 
Hey @terdon how are you ?
 
@Kiwy Fine thanks :)
 
10:54 AM
How odes it works Software Request has you should not be opinion based :D
 
@Kiwy Just describe what you need this program to do and ask if anyone can recommend something
 
anyway, I will try if I do not find it, but I'm getting close
I found tripwire, and I'm pretty that a little brother of its I'm after
 
@Kiwy That's great. You do unix type things?
 
@FaheemMitha Linux Cisco fortinet Mail stuff support cabling customer projet internal project well, pretty much everything :D
that's awesome sauce
 
@Kiwy Wow, that's a lot of stuff.
 
11:00 AM
Well as I'm still pretty uncomfortable with cisco network is what I do the less I also do shoretel and asterisk stuff :D
@FaheemMitha well in one year I have made more stuff than I've done during my 6 years of study :D
 
@Kiwy Welcome to the world of adults! ;-)
 
@Fabby I'm 26 and I 've been 3years in part time work/study so I know pretty much well the world of companies and work. Just that I was workling in udge company
 
Same here though:
Ex-dev, ex-SysEng, ex-NetEng
etc...
 
And it wasn't really interesting
 
Cisco IOS certification is a good thing to have...
Talk to the boss about it that you need a course (or if that fails: a few books)
(who cares whether it'll be company property)
 
11:06 AM
@Fabby I've the basics of Cisco but I have real issue with the way Cisco organize its configuration
 
That's because it's a mess!
 
the problem comes more from the IOS than the network I understand pretty well
 
They were first so had to develop from scratch...
For an old fart like me, who's grown up with it, it's no big deal, but I can imagine for a kid like you...
 
Ask me some quagga and I will be much more comfortable :D
 
... it's totally illogical!
Just work a lot on it and it'll become second nature...
like bash: that's a mess too!
>:)
But very powerful too!
 
11:09 AM
well it took me less than 2 months of day to day use to understand bash, I work on cisco almost every week for a year and still :D
it's like every time I thing of a way to do things and I need to do the complete contrary :D
 
Yup! I feel your pain... ;-)
 
@Kiwy udge?
 
@FaheemMitha hudge udge huge don't remeber the orthograph
I'm probably wrong :D
 
@Kiwy Oh, you meant huge? As in large/big?
 
@FaheemMitha indeed
 
11:15 AM
@Kiwy ok
 
\ (^_^)/
 
12:05 PM
F*** Me this was not etcckecker, but ETCKeeper
etckeeper
Though it's finally not exactly what I want to do :-D
 
 
4 hours later…
4:03 PM
@Kiwy I use etckeeper everywhere. It's pretty nice, especially if you go through the effort of manually committing your changes (with a real description) instead of just letting the daily cronjob, pre/post install, etc. hooks do it all
 
@JNat Well, he used to live here but he's been very busy in real life lately so he comes in far less often to chat.
 
@terdon I've asked around at IRC in the meantime, and there seems to be a consensus that 7 is probably the best choice going forward.
 
Sounds reasonable
 
I thought the same :)
 
4:21 PM
@JNat 7 what?
 
CentOS
 
@terdon: are you there?
 
@derobert 6 vs 7
yesterday, by JNat
Hey everyone! Quick question: I had been studying for a certification, and having chosen CentOS as my distribution, the version that would be used in the test would be 6.4. I had to suspend my studying for a while, but now I wanted to pick it back up. It was recently announced that I can use either CentOS 6 or CentOS 7 — as I'm going to pick it back up, I'll essentially be starting from scratch, sooo.... Are there any reasons in particular why I should stick to 6 or change to 7?
 
@JNat Ah, yeah, makes sense.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:11 PM
Wow, people still run UUCP? [re: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/219324/…
 
7:50 PM
@derobert and some people are still running unshadowed password files and ok posting them in public. (re unix.stackexchange.com/questions/219260 ). I'm tempted to reply to his question "are these password bogus?" with "nope, your root password is XYZ, certainly not bogus"
 
8:06 PM
@casey I think you should... at least tell OP he needs to change the password, now.
 
@derobert i have john ripping it as we speak just for that purpose.
the lp account password took microseconds to crack "passwd1"
 
highly secure.
 
i'm waiting for the root pw to post, I figure that will be more effective than just "change it now!"
 
it has both letters and numbers. If it were pa%%wd1, it'd be ultimately secure with letters, numbers, and symbols
 
:)
 
8:09 PM
I'm hoping from the question that the OP is trying to recover data off some old machine he found in an attic, so disclosure of the passwords doesn't matter.
 
that is my thought. "need to boot" implies to me it hasn't been running for a while and with non-shadowed password and ksh, perhaps a very long time.
 
8:50 PM
some food for thought:
11
A: Voting history statistics request

bluefeetWell, it only took 6-8ish days to gather the data for this, but a few of us have pulled together most of stats that you requested. We queried the voting history over the past 90 days, and looked at votes grouped by the reputation of the voter at the time the vote was cast. Voting patterns (Up ...

 
9:03 PM
Hey, I don't suppose anyone minds giving me a hand with something? Some drivers aren't installing, and as a result not claiming my WiFi card, so I can't use WiFi.
So in basic terms, I'd like some help installing these drivers which refuse to :)
 
@HarryCBurn Ask a question on the site. Don't forget to mention the distribution.
 
(I feel as though it wouldn't fit the format of Unix.SE, since I'd need to give more information than I know how to get. Although I guess I could try.)
^ Beat me to it :)
Sure, I'll ask now.
 
@HarryCBurn if people need more information they'll prompt you for it in the comments and probably supply commands for you to run to gather it.
 
@HarryCBurn You can stay in chat in case people have questions.
Actually, you should stay in chat.
 
I plan on it c: Just scanning SE for any related questions.
There's some related questions, but with different issues and solutions.
 
9:25 PM
Some of the related questions will hopefully give you an idea of what information is required.
 
Yeah, I tried to include as much relevant information as I could.
Ah, forgot lsusb.
Anything I forgot?
0
Q: Why is my WiFi card unclaimed by drivers in UbuntuMATE?

HarryCBurnThe title says the main issue, my Realtek 802.11n WiFi card isn't being claimed by the drivers from here. I installed led the drivers using the install.sh script given in the decompressed tar.gz. *-usb:4 UNCLAIMED description: Generic USB device product: 802.11n NIC ...

 
10:06 PM
@HarryCBurn what happened when you ran the install.sh script? Did it work? were there errors? did the module load properly? (lsmod and look for rtlXXXX or similar drivers)
 
@casey I didn't see any errors, not sure if it loaded properly, but there's no rtl... type item in lsmod.
Want me to run install.sh and get the output?
 
did you see "Compile make driver ok!!" ?
 
Not sure. I'll run it again.
 
im also not sure that is the right driver for that dongle. googling the usb id suggests its some variant of 8192, but tbh I have no idea. How did you end up deciding to use this driver?
 
Only drivers I cam across.
Getting logs for you now, I got an error.
tar: rtl8712_8188_8191_8192SU_usb_linux_v2.6.6.0.20120405/wpa1.conf: time stamp 2012-04-05 03:42:09 is 1333588869.902553677 s in the future
tar: rtl8712_8188_8191_8192SU_usb_linux_v2.6.6.0.20120405/wpa1.conf: Cannot change ownership to uid 400, gid 401: Operation not permitted
rtl8712_8188_8191_8192SU_usb_linux_v2.6.6.0.20120405/xmit/
rtl8712_8188_8191_8192SU_usb_linux_v2.6.6.0.20120405/xmit/rtl8712_xmit.c
tar: rtl8712_8188_8191_8192SU_usb_linux_v2.6.6.0.20120405/xmit/rtl8712_xmit.c: time stamp 2012-04-05 03:42:13 is 1333588873.89712326 s in the future
The error is at the bottom.
There was loads of the ownership errors before that.
So i'm assuming the issue is bash not finding the command.
@casey I take it I should update my question?
 
10:29 PM
@HarryCBurn you need make and a compiler to build that driver. apt-get install build-essentials might get you what you need
but there might be a better way since you are on a Rpi that doesn't involve building on the device, but not sure
 
@casey The issue with that is that I need an internet connection to do that. Any way I can install directly from a tarball?
 
not unless you find a tarball with a driver built against your kernel which is feasible if you are using a distro kernel
I'd also look into finding a rtl8192 driver (not sure which variant though) to try
perhaps rtl8192cu
but perhaps not
 

« first day (1755 days earlier)      last day (3188 days later) »