Do we really need watch-os when we have apple-watch? Same for activity.app?

Don't we need watch-os and apple-watch as much as we need iOS and iPhone?

There aren't drastically separate apple-watch devices out yet but seems it would be best to keep the hardware/software convention.

Also there is mail.app so why not activity.app?

Sorry I'm not as familiar with the chat room conventions. I guess I need to add @grgarside to notify you. :)

@SteveMoser I don't know—my first reaction was definitely not, but I'm against most new tags unless they're obviously necessary, which I didn't think either of these were. I approved your tag wiki excerpts, but wondered if they were really necessary?

@grgarside I guess that is a good point with tagging both as that is what I did with my question so I should probably change that. To me tagging something as with the hardware tag or software tag helps me to immediately narrow down the question as being hardware or software related. I think the activity.app tag is important though as just another future proofing if Apple allows one to use the iOS activity.app with a device other than apple-watch.

@grgarside I'd say no. Unless/until there's an OS to work on - it's a moot point. We don't have AppleTVOS or AirportOS tags