« first day (179 days earlier)      last day (3053 days later) » 

2:00 PM
I noticed that he paused a little, right before have.
 
Anonymous
Yeah.
 
Anonymous
So it could be a dysfluency.
 
Anonymous
But these TV shows don't leave many dysfluencies in after editing.
 
Perhaps the actor realized that he said something wrong.
 
Anonymous
I wasn't sure what to make of it, so I wanted to post it in chat :-)
 
2:02 PM
It's really interesting!
(The color of the keys on my keyboard input on iPad makes me unsure whether I have the shift key on or not!)
 
Anonymous
I think the if we hadn't have left sort of thing is considered non-standard, but I think it might be too frequent to be considered a speech error. I don't know.
 
Anonymous
2
Q: "hadn't have killed" vs "hadn't killed"

ClementCan someone help? "Dave killed Peter." Dave asked Susan, "why was Peter here?" Susan said, "Maybe he would have told you if you hadn't have killed him." Would there have been any difference if she had said "Maybe he would have told you if you hadn't killed him"? According to my understanding...

 
Anonymous
I found a question with the extra have!
 
Anonymous
By the way, in both protasis and apodosis is probably an example of one of those "bare coordination" thingies Araucaria wrote about.
 
Anonymous
I think the extra have is non-standard, at any rate.
 
Anonymous
2:13 PM
Is it a colloquial American English thing?
 
Anonymous
14 mins ago, by snailboat
So it must have been double modal marking (would in both protasis and apodosis) and would becoming had!
 
Anonymous
I'm not sure why I wrote 'must' here!
 
Anonymous
That seems far too certain.
 
Anonymous
Dumb 2015 snailboat.
 
Anonymous
Hopefully 2016 snailboat will be smarter :-)
 
2:19 PM
@snailboat I doubt that.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, you think it's more widespread?
 
By the way I just learned that I can't use android app to up-vote ELL questions when I hold my phone vertically!
Ah, I thought it's not common.
 
Anonymous
Well, it's certainly not common in what we'd call Standard English.
 
Anonymous
I think from a Standard English point of view, it's ungrammatical.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh no!
 
2:22 PM
But I can work around that easily by just holding my phone horizontally.
 
Anonymous
Yay!
 
Maybe it's my phone, maybe my thumb is too big. I don't know.
After my upgrade I can see one interesting thing. The iPad can understand my speech almost perfectly right at the first time. The problem is it will fix everything after I finish my line. And things can go wrong in every possibly weird way!
 
Hello.
 
(in 9.2, I can see what I say almost instantly.)
 
Anonymous
Oh, I see! Maulik asked the a dead Michael Jackson question before, and I answered it! I forgot. I guess my answer wasn't good enough, though.
 
2:26 PM
Hello!
 
Quick query: what do they call it when one thinks of their position (specifically their job) too highly?
There's a specific phrase which I'm not able to recall.
 
Anonymous
TRomano answered a question which is a duplicate of Maulik's old question.
 
Anonymous
TRomano's answer seems good, too.
 
Often in context of putting others down/exploiting them.
 
Hmm... I can't think of anything else at the moment.
How about "swell"?
 
2:28 PM
Oh, it's not a word.
 
It's rather old-fashioned.
 
It's a phrase.
I can't even call that a phrase.
 
@snailboat I remember that your answer is good enough.
 
I can't think right now.
I was diagnosed with chickenpox today.
 
Aww
 
Anonymous
2:32 PM
Oh no! Are you an adult?
 
I'm 16.
 
If you are a teenager, it will pass soon enough.
 
Anonymous
I hope you feel better soon!
 
Hey, I got it at around the same age!
 
Thanks, guys.
 
Anonymous
2:33 PM
I got it when I was seven, I think.
 
The younger the better. :D
 
Yes, that's a general rule of thumb for diseases like this, I guess.
 
It was uncomfortable like hell, the way I remember it.
But it passed. :D
 
It is, it is. :(
Which is why I can't think at the moment.
I've been told not to scratch it.
Which makes sense.
 
That's very good advice!
 
2:34 PM
But you can't get rid of this itching with logic.
 
Find something you like and try to concentrate on it.
 
I've still refrained so far.
Like I am right now? :)
 
(I used some anime. :-)
 
The calamine lotion didn't quite work as told.
 
nods -- But perhaps the best thing you have.
 
2:37 PM
OK, the phrase was something like getting to one's head
 
Oh! That didn't cross my mind, but I understand you now.
 
Oh, so what is the thing exactly?
 
I'm not sure, but I have an expression for it in my first language.
 
Anonymous
Oh, you must mean go rather than get!
 
Thanks.
 
2:39 PM
~ "make someone conceited"
 
Anonymous
I wasn't able to guess until you said that.
 
Yeah, I guess that's the general meaning.
 
@snailboat Here's a bit from my old master's dissertation. It's reasonably common in standard Englishes (both American and RP) but restricted nearly entirely to spoken English.
3.3 The had have conditional
Fillmore (1990: 139), Dancygier & Sweetser (2005: 63-65) and Comrie (1986: 94) amongst others note a conditional which resembles a type 3. Not recognised in formal written SSBE, this conditional seems to have a further perfective auxiliary in the protasis as in (15).
(15) If he’d’ve opened it, we’d’ve died.
(Fillmore 1990: 153)
Whilst Fillmore thinks this is a particularly American construction, it has been noted in British varieties ((Dancygier & Sweetser 2005: 64), Comrie (1986: 94)), and I am certainly very familiar with it amongst so-called RP speakers. Ther
 
Anonymous
@Araucaria Oh, thank you for the quote!
 
Thank you.
I'm not able to think clearly at the moment.
 
2:41 PM
@snailboat Your welcome :)
 
How am I supposed to sleep?
 
Anonymous
What is "type 3"?
 
Anonymous
@ParthKohli Dunno. I'm in one of those "can't think clearly / how am I supposed to sleep?" states myself :-)
 
@snailboat A past time reference so-called remote conditional.
 
Anonymous
For now, I'm typing random messages into chat.
 
2:43 PM
I've said this before, but you guys are friendlier than the ones at ELU.
 
It's just a term I used to bridge different terminological differences. It doesn't exist outside of that piece.
 
Anonymous
@Araucaria So you would say it is standard.
 
It appears to be, to the extent that there are enough attested examples from standard speakers. But no-one uses it in writing.
 
Anonymous
:26190087 Ah, let's try to stay friendly here, too, shall we? :-)
 
Anonymous
I haven't always been as friendly as I should.
 
Anonymous
2:45 PM
But I'm trying to be friendly right now.
 
@snailboat Hey, I was just testing my newly-discovered phrase. Haha.
 
Anonymous
Of course, if I'm unfriendly, that's not really an indicator of knowledge . . . ;-)
 
Anonymous
Just that I need to stop being so grumpy.
 
0
A: Is 'had have + past participle' a correct grammatical form?

Erlyn Jean EspinosaI don't know what tense is had have + past participle' As what I know, it should be 'Had + past participle of the verb' I hope it helps.

 
Anonymous
@Araucaria Do you think the homophony between the reduced forms of would and had is relevant at all? I would've thought "If he'd've opened it, we'd've died" would be reduced from "If he would have opened it, we would have died".
 
Anonymous
2:51 PM
When I hear someone say it with had I get a little confused, but when I hear it contracted it sounds fine to me. I always identified it with would.
 
I wonder how widespread it is and if it always is "had" (which makes it sound like it's from "would").
 
The last time I talked to Damkerng, there was some kinda martial law in Thailand.
 
nods -- I think it's a confusion that is caused by contraction.
Oh, maybe it was almost two years ago, perhaps?
 
Hmm, yeah, I just looked it up on Wiki and it's been a while.
> At 3 am, on May 20, 2014, following seven months of civil and political unrest, Army Commander-in-Chief Gen.Prayuth Chan-ocha, declared martial law nationwide.
 
nods -- That sounds about right.
 
2:55 PM
@snailboat Well that's the thing. American writers seemed to be divided when I last looked. My experience is that RP speakers nearly all strongly feel it's a had and US speakers are far more likely to think it's a would - although some still think it's had.
The interesting thing in that other question is that it uses a negative - so we see the full auxiliary there, which in the case of that particular example is a hadn't, not a wouldn't. I wonder if speakers who feel it's a would are more likely to view it as non-standard?
 
Anonymous
@Araucaria Yeah, the example I quoted earlier this morning uses a negative, too:
 
I think it wouldn't be obvious if it's not in the negative.
 
Anonymous
It's from a TV show, spoken by an Canadian actor.
 
Anonymous
If it's reduced most of the time such that it's ambiguous whether it's would or had, it would make sense if different speakers acquired it different ways.
 
2:57 PM
@snailboat Which show btw? In case I ever want to refer to it maybe ...
@snailboat Agreed ...
 
Anonymous
@Araucaria This is Arrow, season four, episode six, and the quote starts at 23 minutes, 22 seconds in.
 
Anonymous
I wrote it down :-)
 
Wow, that's very precise!
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, I wanted to be able to grab the recording later! :-)
 
Anonymous
@Araucaria I forgot you'd studied conditionals so closely! I think I have a vague memory of learning that from a discussion between you and StoneyB a while back.
 
3:01 PM
@snailboat Wow, that great. Thanks! :)
@snailboat I still am. That's what I'm doing my PhD thesis on ...
 
Anonymous
A-ha!
 
\o
 
Anonymous
Hi, Jim! We were just discussing grumpiness, me being dumb, and also conditionals.
 
Anonymous
How are things going over there?
 
3:12 PM
Did anyone talk about the I win/I won question that was raised, er, back in the day?
 
Anonymous
I don't remember. Can you link to the question?
 
(Irritated) If you're going to be doltish, I don't wanna talk a out it.
Thete I incorporated grumpiness, stupidity, and a conditional!
 
Anonymous
Well done! ;-)
 
:)
Hmm... Better crank up the ole notebook. Just a sec.
Essentially, why "I win" after a game?
Does it fit what's been called the historic(al) present?
 
Anonymous
Oh!
 
Anonymous
3:17 PM
I see, I see.
 
Anonymous
But five minutes later, you'd say I won.
 
5
Q: I win or I won right after the end of a game

cellikTwo kids are playing a game. Right after the game is over one of them shouts happily: "I won! I won!" or should he better say "I win! I win!"

 
@JimReynolds @snailboat Hi!
 
Hi user62015
 
I want to ask you one question. What's wrong with this sentence?
The population of Bombay is greater than Delhi.
 
3:22 PM
I think it's ok.
 
Books says it must be:The population of Bombay is greater than that of Delhi.
 
I'd say something like, "The population of Bombay is greater than that of Delhi" just to avoid any sort of confusion.
Yes, exactly.
 
It's clearer that way, and more logical.
Think like this: What two things are you comparing.
population and population.
 
Yes.
 
So the original sentence looks like you are comparing the population of Bombay to the city of Delhi itself.
So, if you are in a class and taking a test in which that book is used, the right answer is the book's answer. l
 
Anonymous
3:24 PM
@user62015 I don't know if it must be that, but you can certainly say it that way and it makes sense :-) Plus, it fits your preferred formal style.
 
Also, the correct sentence involves the use of the word "Mumbai" because you don't want to be beaten up by Shiv Sena goons.
 
In real life, most people would accept either way in speech, and many people would accept it informal writing, I think.
:D
lol Parth
 
Any technical reason?
 
I think the reason is logical, not grammatical?
Snailboat knows more than me.
 
Okay.
 
Anonymous
3:27 PM
Hey, don't defer to me! I'm intellectually lazy!
 
There are technical ways to describe why we use "that" to represent population.
 
As you're comparing the populations of the cities, you would use "the population of..." before both cities.
 
Did you feel that it would be ok to use either sentence?
 
But the reason we say "than that of" is because it feels weird to repeat something in a sentence.
 
That's technical!
 
3:28 PM
The same reason why pronouns are used.
 
Anonymous
@JimReynolds 'Cause it's a pronoun and you don't need to repeat yourself? Ack!
 
Anonymous
A moth just attacked me.
 
Anonymous
I love moths, but they don't understand boundaries.
 
O.O
Does the moth appear to weigh more than six pounds?
 
Anonymous
No, it was tiny, but it flew into my face!
 
3:29 PM
@snailboat where do you live?
 
Anonymous
Moths don't mind doing that. :-)
 
OK. Well, I'm at least somewhat less concerned then.
 
Anonymous
@ParthKohli I live in California, in the United States.
 
I live under illusions.
 
@snailboat Wow, you're the first American who did not think of their state as self-sufficient. Most of you are convinced that your state is your country. Haha.
 
Anonymous
3:32 PM
Let's reopen this question:
 
Anonymous
5
Q: Why oak is considered an adjective in 'the big oak tree'?

GforOevOerDI have been reading grammar instructions on this website. When I came across the bottom of the page, there was a quiz. In the quiz it was noted that the word oak in the following sentence is an adjective. In the spring, red roses blossom in my cute small garden. The beautiful birds also sing...

 
She probably also tends to use "United States" instead of "America", since it's more accurate.
She's a careful snailboat.
 
Hear, hear.
My attention-span is currently a grand three seconds.
 
Anonymous
It's currently closed as a duplicate of a question whose sole answer doesn't give any tests for adjective-hood.
 
I haven't read the answers carefully, but that's a nice question.
 
3:35 PM
That's adjectivity!
 
Anonymous
The question asks why oak is an adjective. To answer it, we need to establish what it means to call oak a noun or an adjective in that example.
 
However, I'd say something like the whole oak-tree is a noun.
 
Wines are described as oakey, aren't they? Is that the spelling.
And some people!
 
Something like this answer, yes. ell.stackexchange.com/a/75933/116
 
Anonymous
For example, if oak is gradable, that's an indication that oak is an adjective. Can we have a very oak tree? Not all adjectives are gradable, though.
 
3:37 PM
My oak tree is not very oakey, I must admit.
 
Anonymous
Since it's closed as a duplicate of a question without any answers that discuss points like this, we should reopen it.
 
I'm a little ashamed.
OK. I think I was #5, snail.
Now you owe me.
 
Anonymous
You were percent five?
 
I was.
 
Anonymous
A-ha!
 
Anonymous
3:40 PM
Wait, there's still only four reopen votes.
 
O.O
It's coming all the way from Taiwan, maybe.
 
Anonymous
I think you were percent four.
 
@snailboat Sorted.
 
Anonymous
Thank you!
 
Hmm... I thought for sure it said 4 before I clicked.
Could someone else have voted to close?
Notice MAR voted to close. He would make a good prosecutor.
 
3:43 PM
@snailboat How about an oak table?
 
Talk show host: I guess your long hair makes you a hippie. Frank Zappa: I guess your wooden leg makes you a table.
 
I CANNOT TAKE IT!
 
What can't you take, Parth?
 
Oh, the thing is I've got chicken pox.
People tell me not to scratch these.
But they're so bad.
 
Oh! Terrible.
Yeah. What can you do? My gosh!
I guess if you scratch them, it will get even more irritated.
 
3:52 PM
Yeah, exactly. I know they will.
Which is why I'm not.
 
Oh, I feel pity for you!
 
What's an appropriate response to sympathy?
People say it lasts only four days.
"only"
 
Well, in general, you could just say "thanks".
But in my case, it's not really what I want.
What day are you in now?
Is it the first day, or ... ?
Is there medicine that reduces the itch?
 
I don't know how we really define day one.
My first blister appeared on Monday.
But they only unleashed themselves fully this early morning.
 
"your doctor may recommend over-the-counter painkillers and an antihistamine to relieve pain, itching and swelling."
 
4:02 PM
I do have them.
 
I would try to get heavy painkillers. Narcotics.
 
I'd rather not.
 
Where are you, Parth?
o/
 
I'm in India where it is Wednesday, 21:33.
 
I'm at Wednesday 00:04
 
4:04 PM
Anybody missed me?
 
Well, have you avoided all scratching so far?
I heart you, Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ..
 
I did scratch my first two blisters on Monday back when I had no idea.
 
Snailboat wants to reopen a question you VTC'd.
 
I didn't even know they were there - I don't look often in the mirror.
 
@JimReynolds Thanks. Now I can sleep better tomorrow in the class.
 
4:05 PM
Oh, but you are controlling yourself very well then.
lol
 
Unfortunately, the first one was right in the middle of my forehead.
I can imagine how horrific it would be if it becomes permanent.
 
Probably only to you.
 
It'd look like an Indian bindi.
 
What does a bindi signify?
I'm sadly ignorant of Indian culture.
 
BTW hey @Parth! Welcome to LO!
 
4:07 PM
@JimReynolds If it makes you feel any better, so am I.
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Thank you!
 
Haha. It's a complex culture, for sure. I know that much.
Or I guess, dozens of cultures, right?
 
That point is pretty significant in Hinduism and Buddhism.
Some sects say it's where the soul resides, some say it's where creation begins, and so on.
 
That does sound significant!
I think we are all characters in Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.'s computer game.
 
@JimReynolds You know too much.
 
@JimReynolds I'm an NPC.
 
4:12 PM
Well, how many times have we had this conversation, and what's programmed to happen to us?
I can't stand the suspense!!!
 
Health: 0%. Muscle: 0%. Brains: 0%. Achievements: 0%.
 
You must hate Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. for giving you chickenpox.
What's the reason for such cruelty, Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.?
 
I was reading about Edward Jenner.
What a great man.
 
I didn't know that the smallpox vaccine was the first vaccine.
I know of it as the most famous citation of a horrible, horrible disease that's been eradicated due to vaccines.
 
4:39 PM
I wish we had an unlimited supply of water
so I could pour it on me all night
 
5:23 PM
Hmm.
I should go study something language.
 
Hello @DamkerngT. Hello all!
 
\o @Hanaa
 
Hello@CopperKettle
Yes @Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ.
@snailboat hello! I saw this question
4
Q: 'A dead [Proper Noun]' is okay?

Maulik VI've read it at many places. I'm not sure whether they were authentic sources. But in any case, is it grammatical to say 'A dead [proper noun]'? Say, A dead Michael Jackson I mean an indefinite article for a proper noun? [Here are some results; kindly consider the relevant ones] I onl...

 
We all saw it. :)
 
Hi Hanaa!
 
5:30 PM
I have no information about it
 
Hi, @Hanaa!
It's a very tough question.
I found nothing on it in Quirk et al.
 
@CopperKettle It must be since it's a relatively new phenomena, though we need @Stoney to tell us when it started to appear.
 
I have not understand the sentence meaning
a Dead Hanaa for example?!
what s that?
 
It's used in special contexts @Hanaa.
You can just ignore the indefinite article.
It exists to give the sentence artistic hue.
 
It's curious, right?
I think I posted a good use of it in another room.
 
5:34 PM
yes
 
Articles are the hardest bits of English. It's better to learn words and not to fuss overmuch over articles until you're quite fluent.
 
@DamkerngT. I'm waiting for an answer from @Snail, @Arau or a mighty @Stoney.
 
yes yes
but Dead Hanaa
 
Mhm, that doesn't work. :/
 
what does it mean?
 
5:35 PM
I'm not on my desk so I have no access to my computer and it's a little bit difficult for me right now.
 
Anonymous
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. It's not new
 
No problem@DamkerngT.
 
@snailboat Then I'm not searching for the correct keywords.
 
I think I said at but it converted it to on.
 
@Hanaa "He knew Hanaa was alive and well, albeit very far, but a dead Hanaa kept appearing in his dreams so often that he was afraid of going to sleep."
 
5:37 PM
hhhh ok @CopperKettle
 
Hullo @ldeoliveira! Welcome!
 
Hi! thank you!
 
in ELL's Cabin, 8 hours ago, by Damkerng T.
> There's no good Jones but a dead Jones.
Hi!
 
Anonymous
@CopperKettle It's covered in Quirk et al 1985. Turn to page 288, section 5.61 'Proper nouns behaving as common nouns'.
 
what are you guys talking about?
 
5:39 PM
I see crowns on @DamkerngT. and @CopperKettle profile pictures!
 
We are talking about a dead Michael Jackson
 
An appearing crown
 
Curious. I said "We're" it typed "We are".
 
I like michael jackson
 
5:40 PM
@Hanaa HATS!
I like Jack Michaelson.
 
@snailboat It's been open on that page the livelong day, Snails. (0:
 
There's something on snailboat's avatar too.
 
How do you pronounce the English contractions?
 
I don't know but, hey, don't works!
 
@Nihilist_Frost Just like I would've pronounced their "expanded" version.
 
5:42 PM
/wir/ for we 're
 
Mostly boiling down to pronouncing their most pronounced consonant.
 
@DamkerngT.!?
 
@DamkerngT. Who's don't?
 
They are crowns for ; i think, your good job , in this site
 
Better?
 
Anonymous
5:43 PM
@Nihilist_Frost You'll have to be a lot more specific.
 
Anonymous
@Hanaa We're can also be reduced to /wər/.
 
You'll is pronounced: /yool/
 
Ah, hats are for everyone!
 
Yes
 
Oh, I pronounced 'don't' as if I'm moaning.
 
5:44 PM
We pronounce the English contractions in the same way as we contract the English pronunciations.
 
BTW you can choose to wear a hat only for a specific site, lest you guys didn't know.
 
@snailboat Pick any contractions.
 
I'll is /ɑl/ for me
 
Anonymous
Hmm, this chat room has gotten a bit too active. We're having too many discussions at the same time, so we're not getting anywhere useful in any of them.
 
5:46 PM
C-e-a-utiful!
 
(0:
I should get a pixel art kettle. (0:
 
@Hanaa is that /ju:l/ in IPA?
 
I should get a selfie using Pubchem.
 
Yes @Nihilist_Frost
 
@snailboat And this @Dam person doesn't gallery it even though I told him 3000 billion times.
 
5:48 PM
For me "you'll" is /jʊl/ ~ /jəl/
 
Let's blame it on the hats! :P
 
Yes indeed @Nihilist_Frost
 
I think I've heard both. Not sure when or what dialect which appears more often.
 
I don't have this IPA in my computer
 
@Hanaa Internet is sometimes wonderful: westonruter.github.io/ipa-chart/keyboard
 
Even moar wonderfullll
 
Thaaank u
 
Let's recap: I think we have two topics going on simultaneously. One is the use of the indefinite article with a proper name. The other is about contractions in English.
 
yes@DamkerngT.
 
And we're talking about how to type IPA stuff, too.
 
5:52 PM
I found it
it s ok
/ʃəl / for she'll
 
I think I make an "i" between the "sh" sound and the "l" sound.
 
Me too.
 
For me "he'll" is homophonous to "hill"
 
Anonymous
@CopperKettle Oh, I see, you didn't mean turning proper nouns into common nouns generally.
 

« first day (179 days earlier)      last day (3053 days later) »