@user I expected me, Redwolf, you, Lyxal, Adam and Bubbler to nominate themselves and get most of the votes, and I kinda expected a "wildcard" candidate who would get not many votes
Didn't expect 2 wildcards, nor did I expect downvotes/negative scores
I knew you and Bubbler would come out on top, and kinda expected Adám to too, with Redwolf and Lyxal in 4th and 5th place (not in that order), then me a few votes down.
@cairdcoinheringaahing Yeah, that felt kinda unfair.
I do agree with mbomb's comment underneath it tho, and is probably the reasoning behind a lot of downvotes. Remember that downvotes on meta mean "I disagree with the message/point of this post"
So it's more "I would not vote for you as RO, and/or I don't think you should be an RO", rather than anything specific against Wezl
@Wezl Strongly disagree with that. Upvote if I think it's good (or I've answered it or it's answering my challenges), bounty if I think it's really good, downvote if it's bad or low-effort, flag if it's breaking rules, otherwise do nothing
@cairdcoinheringaahing That's going to be hard. How do I contact you every time I think you might find an answer good or really good, or you've answered it already? :P
@RedwolfPrograms yes; the process is basically just going to be: i lock the nominations post, post the voting thread asap, wait a week, lock the voting thread, take the top four people based on upvote/downvote, superping WW and JoKing again, and as long as they have nothing against the selected candidates, grant them RO access
The players decide to be either player one or player two. Both pick either 0 or 1. If they pick the same number, one wins. If they pick different ones, two wins.
it should be decided via CnR. the cops are the RO candidates, and the robbers will be people writing programs to do bad stuff to chat without being caught, of course
I just realised that Naughty or Nice? is brutal against the random bots. If they return any number other than 5 specific ones, it just immediately plays 1 for the rest of the match
Also, it's wild that you could show most people of a certain age range "dQw4w9WgXcQ", a completely random and weird string of letters and numbers, and they'll understand what it's referring to
Like, idk about y'all, but most people in my school had/have the rickroll URL memorised
@hyper-neutrino Huh, that's odd. I guess it's a userscript-only thing since using it in the console gives me Scripts may close only the windows that were opened by them.
Requiring a slightly cumbersome output format (in order to standardise answers) isn't too much of a problem in non-code-golf challenges (e.g. CnR or KotH), right?
@cairdcoinheringaahing no, I don't think I will :p
@cairdcoinheringaahing seeing as how the whole point of lenient IO is to avoid boilerplate in code golf, and given that byte count isn't necessarily important in those tag types, I think having a strict format is okay
@user farmer (villager) wants to do things (stand around and make their trades better) in a memory cell that Redwolf is experimenting with to make a computer in minecraft
@pppery Any particular reasons beyond "There isn't much call for new ROs"? That seems to be the biggest against reason I can think of
Potentially, you could measure the ability of a bot to "pass" a turing test by having a chat room with N users in it. Each bot is tested by joining that chat room and starting a brief conversation. However, the "bot" field is half bots, half other users pretending to be bots. After each bot has it's conversation, the N users in the room vote yay or nay on whether it was a bot or not
Rob the King: Hexagonal Mazes
Consider the following hexagonal maze:
E . \ . . .
. . . \ . \ .
. . . . \ . \ .
_ _ _ _ . \ . \ .
. / . . . . . . | .
. | . . _ _ _ _ / . .
. \ . \ . . . / . .
. \ . \ . . / . .
. \ . \ . . . .
. \ . \ / . .
. \ . | . X
E represents th...
