this somewhat messes with the election thread, lol. if i change it, people might vote for the wrong person thinking it's by the old ID. if i don't change it, it's wrong, and people who click on the chat/site profile links might get confused
The answers need to provide a program in a language per line which would return the character. (If I'm reading correctly.) Does it look like it'd be possible to use an interpreted language with an invocation argument?
Using them means it's "technically" a different language for the purpose of competing (e.g. "Cubically -3" vs "Cubically -4"), but that has no practical effect on using them
It's not obvious to me how to provide TIO the invocation argument. Here's a little cubically program. How do I run it having specified a 4x4x4 cube? (Here's the relevant cubically documentation, at "multiple sizes".)
Finding shortest move-sequences to achieve an arbitrary face-state on a 5x5x5 cube, using only a restricted set of the possible moves? Shouldn't be too hard :sarcastic_goblin:
@Bubbler i still think it should be disallowed completely given that part of the program is now in the form of mouse movement that the user must now do while "running" the program
a language is defined by implementation and as such unless you have an interpreter that can accept mouse commands as bytes somehow and run that as code it doesn't make sense
there might be edge cases where this could be up to intepretation and thus might need a meta discussion but this isn't one of them IMO
Currently, the system protects any challenge that either:
Has 3 deleted answers from new users
Has multiple answers from new users within a short amount of time
We already have a policy that basically says "99.99% of questions here do not need to be protected". In short, we encourage answering ...
How could the bounty reasons be improved? has been status-review for four years now. I think we should have this discussion again, since nothing really seemed to happen from the last one, and we can take a look into whether we should change anything and status-completed it or if we decide there i...
You are kinda Replacable to Me
You are provided with an array \$A\$ of integers, all greater than 0. But what good is an array if the elements do not sum up to the number \$N\$ (also provided as input)...
So to change that, you can pick any integer of your choice present in the array and replace ...
@user [Implemented the new numbers](cgcc-user.surge.sh). It also compiles a program string, but doesn't do anything with it yet. I'll add an interpreter once I've finalised everything to use.
@okie Define okie-ish. Your choice, although digit literals, function delimiters, string delimiters and regex delimiters have been taken. You could be some useful function like GCD.
So we have caird as Create user. Who do you think for input and output?
We also need some people for command delimiters / useful large numbers / basic math functions (+-/*%, along with exponent, maybe gcd and hcf, sqrt). I'll see who I can find.
I guess everyone except unrelated string - They can all represent different characters in strings. I can just steal Jelly's string compression, using a similar tactic but with a different base alphabet.