The code in general seems to roughly correspond to []["filter"]["20"]+[1]+[]["filter"]["20"]

which of course does absolutely nothing useful

>> []["filter"]["20"]+[1]+[]["filter"]["20"]
< "undefined1undefined"

Oh I see.

I've voted to delete

Has OP seen the comment(s)?

I don't know, but this doesn't seem like the kind of user who cares about what they post

That is true. However, I remember Dennis telling me that posts shouldn't be deleted very quickly after comments/downvotes are made, because 2 other people and I deleted a bad question once which Dennis had to un-nuke so OP could find it and see the comments (in case the user doesn't know how to navigate SE).

ah, hmm

well...

I imagine the user knows that the program fails?

or something?

I don't know if the user even knows that :P

I don't know if they even meant to post that, though they probably did

I was making a game, but it had insane first player advantage. can anyone here help me?

It seems unlikely that a user would accidentally create a profile, hit the "Answer" button, paste/type that in, and then hit the "Post" button.

Right

@HyperNeutrino only the post part would have to be an accident

^ that's about what I was going to say though

True.

@Wheatwizard why are you a goblin/orc?

Hm. I flagged as VLQ to try to kick into the LQ Review Queue but it isn't showing up.

@DestructibleLemon I'm an olm man

It's deleted

goblins are g

Yup.

@WheatWizard nope

I don't know what orcs are

@DestructibleLemon dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php/Goblin

dwarffortresswiki.org/index.php/Olm_man

nethackwiki.com/wiki/Goblin

But in Nethack its a grey o

nuh uh

it depends on terminal colour

Ok I think we are done here.

ok

From nethack.org:

:P

Grr, there is an unmatched bracket at the end (assuming it's meant to be a smiley)

<insert mandatory xkcd reference here (hint: it's 541)>

oh

Maybe you guys should go to the nethack room @DestructibleLemon @HyperNeutrino

@WheatWizard

@ETHproductions I don't even want to open that because then I will need to find a close-bracket somewhere >.<

I think it was meant to be a face

@Mendeleev lol I don't even know what nethack really is

@HyperNeutrino It's a game

@WheatWizard Ddn't see that

Oh wait it's a different one than the one I thought.

@HyperNeutrino <insert other xkcd reference here (hint: it's 859)>

@Mendeleev I know that much :P

Hey it's the one that breaks poorly-written xkcd parsing programs

well whaddya know

Answer: Use [square brackets :)]

I love how it takes so much effort to actually make an xkcd browser that fails on 859 :P

Or (use the flipped version (: )

@ETHproductions I know right :P

@HyperNeutrino still looks mismatched

^

@HyperNeutrino [nerp :]]

use :D

xkcd is cool

easy fix

^^^

or C:

or :3

for various levels of happiness

(doe this look mismatched? :])

D:

anyway gtg now, have fun (or not :)) figuring out how to end bracketed phrases with smileys

bye

or (ʘ‿ʘ)

Closes its own parentheses!

@totallyhuman ooh

but the pupils on that one look insane

it is disturbing

ehhhhh

We should use ಠ⌣ಠ more though

ಠ_ಠ

ಠ‿ಠ is better

"you're a disappointment, but I'm happy for you"

@ETHproductions Neither am I. :P

Challenge Idea: convert to JSF but try optimize output to be as short as possible

not sure how scoring would work though

The question is: convert what to JSFuck.

js probably

shit mean convert JS to JSF

Well once you get a sufficient number of (large) test cases, you can make it a simple metagolf.

Maybe add the size of the converter to discourage hard-coding.