"This is a Ruby program that generates Scala program that generates Scheme program that generates ...(through 100 languages in total)... REXX program that generates the original Ruby code again."
@DestructibleWatermelon I've been toying around with a "lower level geometry" language, designed just for fun... inspired by billiard ball physics, and theoretical physics way way above my head
My language would use these creatures; they walk forward, have a specific direction, unchanging in excursion funnels, can be scared, and unscared for our purposes.
@HWalters Bear in mind that the output image needs to be the same dimensions as the input image:
@Tally it's "popularity contest", so I'll leave that up to the voters. But note that the way it's written at the moment, the output image does have to have the same dimensions as the input image, so if you use a small input image you'll have to give a small output as well. Of course there's nothing stopping you taking a large input image and then scaling out down inside your program if you want to work with bigger pixels. — NathanielOct 8 '14 at 1:20
ok, so, in my language, there would be 4 main objects: aerial faith plates (AFP), excursion tunnels (ET), and franken cubes (FC), supercolliding super buttons (SSD)
AFP have two settings: they can either change a franken cubes direction, or leave i how it is. Either way, they will be flinging the cube that walks on it
ET leave the direction of a FC unchaged, but move the FC while it is in ET. ET extend until a wall of some sort (haven't figured out walls yet), so the ways that a FC can leave is by a SSB being activated, or by another ET, or by an AFP
I've noticed that sometimes people using exotic languages like Brainfuck don't ever explicitly wrap a solution into a method/function. While sometimes I see solutions in Java and such where they are wrapping their solution into a function.
Is it actually necessary (if the question didn't specif...
@Sherlock9 Well, more like lovable franken cubes the programming language
Because franken cubes are so nice, there will be no way to murder them
they only teleport when the button to spawn them is pressed again
definitely
unless there is a special dropper that does as many franken cubes as necessary
ok, just thought of four more elements: party teleporter: teleports franken cube to have cake and party when a cube steps into it, and wall, which blocks ET, and movable wall, which can be wall or blank, based on button, and noise synthesiser, which makes an angry cat noise to scare franken cubes
The Definitive "Do X Without X" Guide
In a programming language of your choice, write 95 programs, each of which outputs a different one of the 95 printable ASCII characters, without that character occurring anywhere in the program.
For example, if your language was Python, your program that ou...
The Definitive "Do X Without X" Guide
In a programming language of your choice, write 95 programs, each of which outputs a different one of the 95 printable ASCII characters, without that character occurring anywhere in the program.
For example, if your language was Python, your program that ou...
>>> l[::2, ::2, 2]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: list indices must be integers or slices, not tuple
a:b:c constructs a special type of object called a slice object. Those are only recognized in standard Python by certain iterables' __getitem__ methods. Numpy does crazy stuff with __getitem__.
> Issue all the warnings demanded by strict ANSI C and ISO C++; reject all programs that use forbidden extensions. Valid ANSI C and ISO C++ programs should compile properly with or without this option (though a rare few will require `-ansi'). However, without this option, certain GNU extensions and traditional C and C++ features are supported as well. With this option, they are rejected.
@ReleasingHeliumNuclei Count it once per program that uses it, as if they are all independent
Anonymous
@LeakyNun Slices aren't hashable, but they're also (usually) handled differently. Instead of looking up a single value with a single hashable key, you're looking up a range of values with a range of hashable keys.
C, 220 bytes
x,y,r;f(n){
printf("P3 %d %d 255 ",(8<<n)-8,4<<n);
for(y=0;y<4<<n;++y)for(r=0;r<n;++r)for(x=0;x<8<<r;++x)
puts("110 170 90\0 116 196 96\0 0 0 0"+12*
(117-"` t5L\rL\ru5tst5` "[x>>r+2|(y>>r)%8*2]>>(x>>r)%4*2&3));}
I added useless newlines for readability, score is without these newl...
I've noticed that sometimes people using exotic languages like Brainfuck don't ever explicitly wrap a solution into a method/function. While sometimes I see solutions in Java and such where they are wrapping their solution into a function.
Is it actually necessary (if the question didn't specif...
The Definitive "Do X Without X" Guide
In a programming language of your choice, write 95 programs, each of which outputs a different one of the 95 printable ASCII characters, without that character occurring anywhere in the program.
For example, if your language was Python, your program that ou...
Excel, 16 12 bytes, Anastasiya-Romanova 秀
=FACT(n)*2^n
