« first day (1191 days earlier)      last day (3288 days later) » 

5:19 AM
@StevenJeuris It's questions, but downvoting questions doesn't really do anything beyond -1.
 
6:08 AM
(Questions with -1 and no answers, regardless of answer votes, are deleted every week or so.)
@StevenJeuris I think I found out what those invisible review notifications are about: they're close votes that I started. That's why there are so many. :v
 
 
1 hour later…
7:39 AM
Comment system won't let me post it on my chat revival question, so pasting here instead.
Final note: On a personal level, I would especially appreciate it if some of the regulars (@AliceD, @mfloren, @MaríaAnt, @mrt, @Seanny123, @ArnonWeinberg, @user30295, @WillP to name a few) that have joined up during my inactive period would stop by and say hello. I hope this works, since I don't know any other way of reaching out to people over SE.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:12 AM
Hmm .. only when they were in chat before I believe.
 
 
3 hours later…
12:11 PM
I'd particularly like the chance to say hi to @AliceD and @MariaAnt, they've been posting really high-quality answers.
 
True ... how to entice them to enter chat ... :)
 
I had a private chat with AliceD a while ago, but they never showed up here. :[
 
There was a meta post on the mother ship recently about the need or lack thereof for PMs, and somebody pointed out private chats--I've never had good luck with them, though.
 
I don't know how to use them besides engaging in a long comment thread.
 
@ChristianHummeluhr You can create a private chat room (given sufficient rep), and then invite users to it.
Way too much work ...
 
12:18 PM
Yeah, but I don't know how to do that. :p
 
And it mostly requires you to both be on at the same time. Although I guess you could treat it as an asynchronous private message board, if it lives long enough.
 
It sticks around.
At least the comment-spawned chats do.
@mrt as well.
 
what are these comment-spawned chats?
also, good morning and hello!
 
Good morning :v
 
@Krysta After excessive comments underneath a post, the system suggests commencing a private chat. A simple click does that at that point.
 
12:24 PM
^this
time to head out for some real late lunch
 
Oho, I guess I've never hit that threshold. What is sufficient rep to start a private chat?
 
@Krysta Chat privileges, which you most definitely already have.
Guess you just never ran into a comment thread with caseyr. :)
 
I sure didn't! I am much too averse to talking to people and not public-spirited enough to engage with users like that.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:43 PM
Here's my attempt at the new close reason:
0
A: Proposed Reason for Closure: No Initial Reseach

Steven JeurisI understand Jeromy's concerns: [...] the purpose of this site is not to help the person asking the question (helping the OP is a merely a nice side-effect). [...] the purpose of the site is to generate re-usable content that will help hundreds and thousands of people searching for an...

 
2:11 PM
@StevenJeuris Much better than mine.
And haha, a comment thread with caseyr is also how I discovered the feature ...
 
my only concern with @StevenJeuris' close reason is people might be confused about why motivation is relevant
(like I said in a comment)
 
I did upvote that, but I like how concise it is currently, and I'm not convinced that another sentence will really help someone who doesn't already understand what "insufficiently motivated" means.
A relevant SE Meta answer about what common knowledge should be assumed: meta.stackexchange.com/a/210868/217374
 
What it means literally, and why it would be helpful to the site, aren't quite the same thing. I think people will be clear on the former and less so on the latter.
 
What I mean is that people who don't understand both of those meanings won't be helped by another sentence or two, I guess.
 
There's no helping some people :-P
 
2:19 PM
Well, no helping all people all of the time, maybe. :v
 
Like PT Barnum but altruistic. . .
 
Some things can't be explained, only taught or studied.
(I know this very well because I once had to learn linear algebra by proof after using nothing more complex than linear regression for about 6 years.)
 
Oh gawd.
 
2:34 PM
@Krysta What do you think of my subquestion about whether a computational system that fits what we simply assume the brain does in cogsci.stackexchange.com/q/9839/2868?
(The Tegmark quote about how many bits a fitting neural network could actually store.)
er, about whether such a system even exists in principle
 
3:27 PM
@Josh If you want to be really depressed, take a look at that personalitycafe site
I've never seen so many people post about psychology :[
 
whaaaat is personalitycafe? It sounds like a thing to be avoided.
 
@Krysta Apparently it's the place to discover yourself: personalitycafe.com/forum
 
Oh gawd.
 
83% answered :]
 
3:45 PM
Sorry I couldn't make it to the hangout.
I have a big simulation due soon.
 
It's the last milestone I need to clear so I can graduate.
 
It's no problem, I literally pulled the time out of thin air. I'm happy it went as well as it did.
 
I'll definitly be down for more community building after this term ends.
 
I take it you're making a NEF simulation?
 
3:46 PM
Yeah of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task.
A surprising amount of stuff that can be done in a production system maps pretty well to the NEF and SPA.
 
Why isn't the NEF a production system? It has a simulated arm or something, right?
Or am I asking a Babbage question here? :v
 
Yeah. So the NEF on it's own doesn't explicitly define how IF-THEN rules should be implemented. It only shows how to represent vectors and manipulate them.
You really need SPA to do production system stuff.
But I also don't totally understand production systems...
 
Like ACT-R stills seems quite magical to me.
Despite one of the people in my lab writing the Python implementation of ACT-R.
 
The nuts and bolts are beyond me, to be honest, but I collaborated on some work where the AI people used it during my undergrad.
 
3:59 PM
@ChristianHummeluhr This is why your response is so useful. If you google 'dom-tert loops' now, the SE question is top 5, and hopefully a few more peple won't buy into pseudopsychology.
 
That's a really good point. (And more motivation for me to practice negative answers!)
 
@Krysta Agreed. It's the "why should I care?"/"what do I get out of it" side of things. I prefer optimistic phrasing in this regard as well.
Should be easily addressable though.
@ChristianHummeluhr Will read that post later.
@Seanny123 No worries. Nice to hear from you now! ;p
 
 
1 hour later…
5:25 PM
412 unanswered questions on the wall, you take one down and pass it around, 411 unanswered questions on the wall ...
 
@ChristianHummeluhr Only 146 more until the 90% mark...
 
@Josh We'll get there in a jiffy!
 
5:45 PM
Wait, if a close vote I started fails, I can start another one? That's stupid, I can't keep track of which questions I already voted on.
I guess it sometimes posts a comment.
 
6:01 PM
On your profile, under votes, there's a closure tab so you can see what you've voted in.
 
@Krysta Oh, thanks.
Today I'm getting Mortarboard instead of ending up at like 195 rep. I can feel it. >:|
 
woo badges! it is hilarious how motivating they really are. . .
 
6:18 PM
yeah :v
That's my reaction to getting my Electorate badge.
 
7:00 PM
Heh. I got the Reviewer silver recently and was pretty pleased about that.
 
I never get any review points because I start all the close votes, and that doesn't count.
Ha-rumph.
 
7:16 PM
You know what's my favorite badge? Revival.
 
I like that one too!
 
It's basically the Goldilocks badge on CogSci: neither too easy nor too hard, but juuust right.
I would've gotten the silver link-sharing badge for my reaction times validity question, if I hadn't derped the link and forgot to include my ID. :v
 
 
2 hours later…
9:14 PM
@ChristianHummeluhr Where'd you post it?
 
9:53 PM
@StevenJeuris For the purpose of the "Curious" badge, what is a well-received question?
I couldn't find a clear answer on Meta.
 
10:04 PM
You tried SE Meta right?
If you didn't find it there ... beats me. :)
 
Yeah, that's the meta I meant.
 
10:29 PM
welp, I'm off to bed. Tomorrow, 84%! G'night.
 

« first day (1191 days earlier)      last day (3288 days later) »