The new InlinePart symbol @> no more avaliable in wolfram new doc... :(

I think they repented of creation...

reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/InlinePart.html

@Murta Damn... I really liked that operator

@rm-rf me too

Is there any way to make Right Alt work with shortcuts?

@rm-rf Was this working on RPi?

How to prevent font size change in fractions?

@OleksandrR. Thanks :)

@Kuba I would bet on no, but what do I know :)

@JacobAkkerboom about Alt?

@Kuba yeah

@JacobAkkerboom you're probably right. maybe on English setup. But for Polish it is responsible for special characters.

@JacobAkkerboom But I've managed to modify MenuSetap file so does not matter ;)

@Kuba sounds interesting.. Not sure what is in the menusetup file again. Anyway I found a pretty strange keyevent: KeyEvent["ISO_Level3_Shift"]. So maybe others exist?

brb

@JacobAkkerboom I like to comment things a lot :) and Alt + "/" is acrobatic type of shortkey. So I replaced "/" with "e"

@Kuba on my mac, there is the "fn" key in the bottom left and right to that is control. I think i sometimes press control with my thumb now, if I want to type control+1. Quite a surprising realisation. I suppose that when you alt tab you press alt with your thumb?

@JacobAkkerboom Yes.

On mac you have the command key, which I always use with my thumb

I guess it doesn't matter so much for Mathematica, but I did use to play some games where speed was really important

@JacobAkkerboom I have to go now :) see you later ;)

@Kuba okido, see you :)

How to tweet wth Mathematica, provided I sort of unserstand this? mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30237/… What should I look for in “Twitter API documentation”?

This list dev.twitter.com/docs/auth/obtaining-access-tokens doesn't help much. None of the options seems to correspond to my case.

I'm aware of an old post at blog.Wolfram.com blog.wolfram.com/2009/04/30/twittering-with-mathematica but the method doesn't work anymore. Quick source inspection didn't clarify anything, as well.

On one hand, lots of people might be interested in that. On the other hand, the question still doesn't sound really suitable for mathematica.SE. Or is it just me?

Also, why wouldn't (x, y) get interpreted as Sequence[x, y]?

@Akater As to "why wouldn't", the language is just not defined that way, but "why shouldn't" is a good question and I've also felt at times, that this construct might make sense. However, I haven't thought through this fully and there probably might be a good reason for it not to have been implemented...

Reduce[(-1)^n + (-1)^(n + 1) == 0, n, Integers]
Reduce[(-1)^n + (-1)^(n + 1) == 0 &&
  n \[Element] Integers, n, Complexes]
Reduce[(-1)^n + (-1)^(n + 1) == 0, n]
Reduce[(-1)^n + (-1)^(n + 1) == 0, n, Complexes]
Reduce[(-1)^n + (-1)^(n + 1) == 0, n, Reals]
(-1)^(-1/2) + -1^(1/2) == 0

> {n==0, n==0, True, True, C[1]\[Element]Integers && n == -1+C[1], False}

Seems.. odd

@JacobAkkerboom Weird that Reduce doesn't attempt to Simplify expressions. Simplify evaluates to True regardless of assumptions (except for Simplify[(-1)^n + (-1)^(n + 1) == 0 && n [Element] Integers, n [Element] Complexes]]). Anyway, I'd say it's a bug. :-)

@Akater The Q&A that you linked to is not really helpful for Twitter, this is where you should start. As I understand it connecting to Twitter will be much easier in v10.

(Well, easier in the sense that the OAuth functions will be documented.)