« first day (4339 days earlier)      last day (373 days later) » 

Martin R
Martin R
05:51
I suggest to delete math.stackexchange.com/q/4814867/42969 – the question is a duplicate, and the accepted answer is wrong as far as I can tell (author did not respond to request for clarification).
 
2 hours later…
Peter
Peter
07:42
@MartinR gone , but the danger of an undeletion is real.
Peter
Peter
07:53
please delete
Peter
Peter
08:04
please delete - the author also posted another question claiming that Gioldbach is proven ! Here again ...
 
4 hours later…
Feeds
Feeds
11:39
-2
Q: Might be the Riemann hypothesis confirmed?

someonehttps://vixra.org/abs/2311.0097 Any positive comment would be greatly approved. I am the author. I don't have a Phd, but was formed at the Ecole Normale Superieure, in France. I posted it on vixra.org because I am not endorsed on arxiv.org...

riemann-hypothesis
 
2 hours later…
Peter
Peter
13:25
please delete
Martin R
Martin R
This question about a determinant looks like a clear duplicate to me: math.stackexchange.com/q/4815569/42969
Peter
Peter
please close
@Feeds One more delete-vote needed
 
4 hours later…
SmokeDetector
SmokeDetector
17:54
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of body (43): Confused about lemma in Ivan Niven's Irrational Numbers about conjugate elements in a number field‭ by Vincent Lin‭ on math.SE
Bill Dubuque
Bill Dubuque
18:36
C/D more off-topic "EC" numerology by a user who only posts on that topic.
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
19:12
@BillDubuque I feel like there was some other user who was obsessed with "EC primes" at some point. Do you have any recollection of who that might have been?
Ah, found it. Joy.
Bill Dubuque
Bill Dubuque
19:37
@XanderHenderson There have been a handful of such users. It is likely they are all the same person (possible EC himself).
Xander Henderson
Xander Henderson
@BillDubuque Yes, I believe that I have tracked it down. Thank you.

« first day (4339 days earlier)      last day (373 days later) »