[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Linked punctuation in body (25): Inference-Rules need help ✏️ by Salih Nacar on math.SE

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Obfuscated word in answer (0): After swapping the positions of the hour and the minute hand, when will a clock still give a valid time? by Mohamad Lee on math.SE

Voted to close for missing context (math.stackexchange.com/questions/4320801) but found an abstract duplicate later (math.stackexchange.com/q/3172134)

User: math.stackexchange.com/users/999489/highlander1219

@PrasunBiswas Just a advice: It is not a good practice to specifically point out a user for his bad work. You can just give a hint of user name like OP of deleted question

D

c, no clue

CD

CD

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): How to measure time taken by object descending quadratic curve by arthur on math.SE

CD - +1-score ...

delete A bad answer to a question which got good answers years ago.

Off-topic, but where did the stars go?

@Peter Open for deletion

Please consider deletion.

^^^^Now deleted.

Hi, John! (@user999494)

Welcome to Math.se! Ask a good question, or answer well a good question, and earn an upvote or two, and you'll be able to post in this site's chatrooms.

D1

Hey J! (@JitendraSingh). ;D

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): How to measure time taken by object descending quadratic curve ✏️ by arthur on math.SE

@SmokeDetector What exactly does blacklisted user (71) mean?

@amWhy I remember this question had come up recently once before, too...

@amWhy Yes, that's what I take away from it, too.

@amWhy If you click on the "MS" you can find the post which made them blacklisted. For arthur, it was this post, and you have to go into the revision history to see that at the post once read "????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????", which I guess was the trigger.

@user1729 Got it! Thank you!

@JoséCarlosSantos Lol one commenter even flogged that post!

@user21820 I didn't think "flogging" was allowed on this site. And what does it mean to "flog" a user, virtually? =P

@amWhy It's allowed when spelling accuracy flags.

@user21820 I'm teasing your use of "flogged"

I'm just joking, that's all. I knew very well what you meant, @user21820.

@amWhy And I'm using another meaning of "flag" (weaken). =P

@user21820 d= =p Rotation involved

CD

@user21820 Thanks for the closure. Actually, this post received an upvote.

@Peter:

You're welcome.

D - reopen vote ...

@Peter I get you might be afraid to acknowledge me. That's fine. You can do your own thing.

C1, C2, C3.

C4, C5, C6.

C7, C8, C9.

C10, C11, C12.

@amWhy You are right. I should appreciate your votes helping to clean the site. So, thank you for your contributions.

@Peter That post has been undeleted.

Any D's for the day, @user21820? Yesterday, there weren't to many so I spent 12 delete votes using moderator tools.!

@amWhy None directly from me for today.

^ @XanderHenderson @Peter @Saad: Plain PSQ undeleted 3 years later...

@user21820 All it took was anyone who can protect a question, to unprotect it. I just did). The comment you refer to was from a user who did not yet know about what protected question meant then in his first year on the site; it means only that users with less that 5 rep can't post an answer. I wish they renamed that action, so it does not conger images of "inevitability of not touching it".

@amWhy Oh actually I didn't really think about the 'protection'. It's just that this kind of undeletion is what makes the EOQS necessary, in my opinion. CC @TheSimpliFire

@user21820 It would have been less confusing to just link the question.

Yea you're right.

@user21820 But your clarification was sufficient. Thanks.

Please consider closure. Had two upvotes, likely from answerers who answered what strikes me as a poor question. But so as to be clear, I welcome each user to decide for themselves..