D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

D13, D14, D15.

C1, C2, C3.

C4, C5, C6.

C7, C8, C9.

C10, C11, C12.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Mostly non-latin answer (49): Rolle's Theorem 1 by calliope on math.SE

Request for reopen this question

I have to admit that I wasn't asking a question, though. And I don't know how to fix it. It's a self Q&A post showing the classification of groups of order $\leqslant 50$

@Andrews I've turned it into a question, whcih I think it should be if it is to have a place on a question and answer site.

@Andrews p.s. site policy specifically dictates it is fine to post a question accompanied by an answer to one's own question.

@samerivertwice Thank you, converting it into a question is a very good idea!

Please consider reopening this question. While the question is not exemplary, there is a perfectly reasonable response.

@MarkMcClure I found the question a little hard to read; I've tried to clean up the grammar a little, though I am moderately concerned that I may have gone too far. In any case, I agree that this question should be reopened and have voted to do so.

@XanderHenderson Yes, I agree it's not well written. The OP is clearly not a native speaker of English. Thanks!

Which of the following are PSQs math.stackexchange.com/questions/3437204/…

Ugh... apparently we have a real-life example of a person who actually exploits the site for proof checking. It looks like many if not a large majority of posts by this user math.stackexchange.com/users/59734/… are of the form "problem-proof-is that satisfactory?" Looks like the number could be in the hundreds.

The latest of which has garnered a gem of an answer "Looks great to me! Do you have a reason to think something is wrong here?" made all the worse because there is an apparent mistake...

Looking way back in the user's history, they were indeed asking OK questions at some point.

It looks like maybe this binge has only been going on a year or two.