« first day (2676 days earlier)      last day (934 days later) » 

1:13 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in body (62): Can we find an elementary solution to Fermat's Last Theorem? Let's try! ✏️ by Edward Solomon on math.SE
 
 
5 hours later…
user131753
6:38 AM
@JyrkiLahtonen: Although I am sure you are aware of this room as per @MartinSleziak's suggestion in the other room I am pinging you again regarding my last comment to you. I hope you will excuse my being unreasonable earlier and not including a link to the said room when I pinged you the first time.
 
6:59 AM
@user170039 Moving the discussion there is better than having it here. Sorry about not acknowledging that right away.
 
 
2 hours later…
@quid @AlexanderGruber @XanderHenderson @JoséCarlosSantos @RRL: I think we need to enforce more strongly that unsupported insinuations and snide remarks are not acceptable. I will be removing a few from the most recent conversations. If you or any other moderator disagree with any removal, feel free to explain why we should allow them. Thanks. I still think everything else related to CRUDE should be allowed, but stars should be reserved for constructive messages. What do you think?
4 messages moved to ­Trash
I have also unstarred the message that BD just mentioned as a "doozy". (Stating this for the record as per @quid's suggestion.)
@user170039 If I unstar messages, I unstar them impartially based on their content and not their author. Given recent accusations that I am biased, I think you're indeed wrong in saying I should just act. However, since a moderator has fulfilled your request, I will unstar some of your comments that have been starred again.
@JoséCarlosSantos The second one is an interesting careless mistake.
 
9:24 AM
@user21820 The user who wrote it was thinking about z*sin(1/z), of course.
 
@SmokeDetector @JoséCarlosSantos @RRL @XanderHenderson: Unclear question from the same crank.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:36 AM
@user21820 that description is hard to make actionable. I'd recommend this room restricts to it's initial purpose, and discusses posts one at a time. General discussions could happen elsewhere. The advantage of it happening elsewhere is that this room is by now somewhat well-known and thus might be visited by users that just want some post handled occasionally, and it's not ideal if they have to wade through all kinds of talk.
If nothing else create a "CRUDE policies" room or something like this.
In the end I won't tell the regulars here how they should run the thing, but I as a maybe a semi-regular have the impression that the increased amount of talk here, actually distracts from thing getting done.
3
 
11:52 AM
@quid I share that opinion, and you're right that sticking to on-topic discussion is easier to enforce. I was trying (as usual) to accommodate others. But if other room owners prefer a less-talk-more-work policy, count me in. =)
 
user131753
12:08 PM
@user21820 In any case I will just point out that I explicitly mentioned only the remval of the stars of my comment by Jyrki earlier. I didn't say anything about the second starring. So its removal is entirely your choice (since you have already done that).
 
I agree with quid. Policy discussions/arguments make this room less efficient / useful. I hope to be able to show more restraint in the future.
 
user131753
It was wonderful of you to trash my remark. I was hoping you to do that sooner or later. Many thanks @user21820.
 
I'll assume you're not trying to be sarcastic. Any way you know what kind of remarks to avoid next time, and it goes for everybody.
 
user131753
@user21820 Aye, aye sir.
 
@JyrkiLahtonen Thanks for your input.
@user170039 What makes you think I'm a "sir"? Anyway, off-topic.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:16 PM
@user21820 Less talk. More work. Sounds good.
5
 
1:34 PM
D1, D2, D3.
D4, D5, D6.
D7, D8, D9.
C1, C2, C3.
C4, C5, C6.
 
@XanderHenderson I agree.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:48 PM
@RRL @XanderHenderson @JoséCarlosSantos @TheSimpliFire @YuiToCheng @Shaun: This terribly wrong post has 17 upvotes!!
 
@user21820 I downvoted it after reading this HNQ and a link took me there
 
@TheSimpliFire Yep same reason why I saw it.
 
3:20 PM
Bad answer on the HNQ.
 
@user21820 In case it's not deleted, can you post a correct answer? (according to here)
 
@YuiToCheng Let's see how it goes. 4 more downvotes to go!
C7, C8, C9.
By the way, in case everyone has forgotten:
 
 
2 hours later…
5:57 PM
@JoséCarlosSantos @RRL: The wrong post is up for deletion now.
 
6:15 PM
@user21820 Fortunately, I still had 2 deletion votes left. ;-)
 
@JoséCarlosSantos Unfortunately, I didn't.
 

« first day (2676 days earlier)      last day (934 days later) »