Ah... I tried to watch spice and wolf once

I couldn't get into it, but a friend of my wife's recommended it, so we gave it a try.

I think the show is good, but I am close to a "fanboy" for the novel(Although I understand why it can bored some people)

Ah. That is reasonable.

Um... what?!

A protected PSQ!

That was protected?

one needed

This rather old question is not about math.

Close? 1, 2, 3, 4.

Delete? 1, 2, 3.

4, 5, 6.

@XanderHenderson The saddle points can be found inside the big donut that is in the making!

Delete?

Nearly zero mathematics.

I think that this should go to hsm but in the [This question belongs on another site in the Stack Exchange network] it doesn't give that option

@Holo You can flag for moderator attention.

@user21820 thanks for reminding me

You're welcome!

@Holo Fun fact: [hsm.se] expands to History of Science and Mathematics

(both in chat and on the main page)

Nice

How does this answer the question at all? Also, it is arguably without real content.

@user21820 It's open for deletion.

→ 3 messages moved to trash

2 more close votes

This needs to be closed

This really needs to be closed. 3 upvotes, what are people thinking?

@TheSimpliFire cast a downvote; it seems I previously also voted to close. I'm wondering if the question has since been reopened. If so, what were the upvoters/reopeners thinking!?!

@amWhy Timeline here

@TheSimpliFire 'Tis closed!!

Doesn't look like it'd been reopened

Primarily opinion based?

(HNQ)

@TheSimpliFire I'm guessing, then, that in one of the review queues, I voted to close it as off topic/lacking context, cuz I don't have the option to vote (again). One more close vote needed!

@SimplyBeautifulArt Either opinion based or seeking personal advice. It should be closed in either event.

@SimplyBeautifulArt, @XanderHenderson. It seems it's been closed as "off-topic, missing context" which is fair, because no answer to the question can begin to be helpful unless more information is given about the type of problem the OP has in mind.

@TheSimpliFire closed.

Found this on the review queue just now. Voted to close.

One more delete vote

@SimplyBeautifulArt I don't get it; you keep sending me to non-existent posts! :P

:P

This shows no effort, and should probably be closed. It is probably a duplicate of something, but I doubt that it is useful to flag it as such.

In case anyone has missed this: this question needs to first be closed

@XanderHenderson I voted to close as lacking context.

@XanderHenderson Yeah, it is indeed a duplicate of this question

Argh!!! question and answer on this post frustrate me.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Repeating characters in answer: Covering any rectangle with this shape is not possible by user584569 on math.SE