Good night, @DanielFischer!

@SimplyBeautifulArt Vote now! :P

(or, y'know, don't)

You are a free person.

am I?

Question for you, @SimplyBeautifulArt, since you are into big numbers: is this question intrinsically interesting, or is it just a PSQ?

It has the form of a PSQ, but I'm willing to give a pass for intrinsically interesting questions. I just don't know the theory well enough to judge (I'm inclined to close for lack of context).

It's kinda meh, but also that there's very little you can do as far as adding more to it, being so isolated of a topic.

I'd say it's interesting enough

I'll trust you judgement, then, and leave it alone. Thanks. ;)

no problem

Very poor question.

This poor HNQ is up for deletion.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, toxic answer detected: Prove that the foot of the perpendicular from the focus to any tangent of a parabola lies on the tangent to the vertex by Akash Katekar on math.SE

HNQ for closure

well, it's no longer an HNQ as there's now tex in the title

@amWhy perhaps it's because quite a lot of maths HNQs are straightforward and are asked by low-rep users?

New question please reopen math.stackexchange.com/questions/2875728

@XanderHenderson @amWhy @AndrésE.Caicedo: This is wrong and this does not answer the question, as indicated by Asaf's respective comments.

@BCLC Wait, you erased your previously closed question to replace it with two different ones? Why would you do this instead of asking a new question (or in this case, two new questions)?

Bad HNQ.

This appears to be nonsense.

Please review the following and cast votes if you see fit:

1, 2, 3, 4

5, 6, 7, 8

9, 10, 11, 12

13, 14‌​, 15, 16

17, 18, 19

Is there an "abstract duplicate" target for questions of the form "How do I factor this polynomial?"

For example...

Maybe this question...?

Or maybe this one is better?

I've voted to close the question as a duplicate.

PSQ for closure

Ugh... the comment thread here.

PSQ.

Ehhhhh, ... probably off topic: How do you define something?

But maybe not, ... I'm kinda torn

@MikePierce I am not at all clear what their question even is, so I've voted to close as unclear.

I think I've seen a question on here like that one before. Where an engineering sort of person wants to compare mathematical definitions to stuff like inventions or scientific discoveries. Like Patentable stuff.

This is open again, and on the HNQ. The edits make it slightly more clear, but I still don't really see what the asker is after, and it seems crazy broad to me.

Not to mention the fact that there are two or three good dupe targets in the comments.

(The fact that several answers begin with "I don't know if this answers your question..." kind of indicates that the question is unclear.)

This question along with all it's dup targets have very disjoint answers. It's seems weird to call any one a dup of another. Merger? They all have the feel of a general question titled something like What are examples of non-constructive proofs

@XanderHenderson I stretched it, perhaps with the texifying, but the title didn't make clear that the conjecture was the thing that was proven to be solvable.... I can't vote to close.