[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url in title (95): prove that the given triangle is PAB is equilateral i.stack.imgur.com/8rQiL.png by Aayush Snehashis on math.SE

I've flagged math.stackexchange.com/questions/4278063 for moderators attention as it seems like plagiatorism in a sense (it's exact copy of an old MO post), I am not sure why someone would do this (my theory is the person with poor quality posts want to get some reputation points...) Posting it here just to bring more attention.

math.stackexchange.com/questions/1853137/… delete

poor question with seven downvotes!

but not deleted for 5 years!!

@Math I suppose you wanted to link to the question rather to one of the answers...? The question is: Is $\sum_{n=0}^\infty$ a misleading notation?

If you suggest to delete the linked answer without deleting the question, IIRC that requires the answer to have negative score. (And I am not sure whether it is even possible for an accepted answer. In this case, user21820's answer is accepted and has positive score.)

Delete math.stackexchange.com/questions/1853137/…

Poor question

I agree the answer is fine

@MartinSleziak

@Math Why the ping? That seems a bit aggressive.

BTW the question you linked has score -6 with 7 upvotes and 13 downvotes. You probably meant score when you said downvotes.

@user21820 Last two or three Ds only have two delete votes each, the rest are GONE!

C

@MartinSleziak I am not being agrressive to anyone and cant even see how it can even be inetrpteded that way ,all im saying is that the question should be deleted

The link here is apparently still present. Some users marked it as problematic since it is linked to feminism. If the link is problematic, it should vanish.

Also , the question should be at least closed.

D

D

C/D

C/D

C/D

D

D

@Peter The three C/D are open for deletion.

@amWhy As far as I can see, two of them are open for deletion.

bountied low quality question - "almost prime" was only defined in a comment and moreover the question contains a spoiler.

C

@Peter The question is unclear in multiple ways. There are different definitions of almost primeness, and different questions in the title and in the body.

@MartinR I agree. What about the still open C/D and the C ?

@Peter Not my area of expertise, so that's undecidable(!) for me. – But note that you linked to a comment to an answer, so it is not clear if you refer to the comment, to the answer, or to the question.

The "C" is meant for the question.

@Peter I don't know how I missed that one. (The third now needs one more delete vote.)

D1, D2, D3.

D4, D5, D6.

D7, D8, D9.

D10, D11, D12.

C1, C2, C3.

C4, C5, C6.

@Peter I pinned your this message because we can't do anything with the bounty there right now.

@TeresaLisbon Thanks!

@Sil There are many weird users on SE that do crazy things. Anyway one more downvote and it will be up for deletion.

@MartinSleziak One more delete-vote needed.

@Math Gone!

:5937726, @user21820 Open for deletion.

@Sil ^^^

@Peter Thank you's once in a while would be a nice switch. Don't worry about me, but others here.

@Peter You're welcome! I've also dealt with the third, as I said in my response to you. The glass in this case, even with my miss on the third, was 2/3 full, but you seemed to be dissatisfied.

pls close

C/D

Why does this chatroom empty out so early? (Early in my day (before noon) and even earlier in @Xander's day!!

@amWhy And... Plagiarism Gone! @Sil

@user21820 Yay!!

D1, D2, D3, D4

@Sil: By the way, did you flag that plagiarism for moderator attention? Even though it's deleted, but one of us should flag so that there is a record that moderators can easily see.

D5, D6, D7

@user21820 Great! Yeah I did flag it, btw since then the same user posted another exact copy: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4278156/approximate-proof , that one I only flagged for closure

@user21820, @TeresaLisbon The Post immediately above is now closed, 3 downvotes, one delete vote from me. Needs to go. The OP posted a copy of a question earlier asked and then deleted. I'll flag, as well, for @Xander & company

@Sil My personal opinion is that you should flag every single copy (and let us know when you request closure/deletion so we don't also flag), because I think moderators would love to have those flags for reference, otherwise they may miss the repetition of the problem behaviour.

@user21820 sure I was kind of expecting that when dealing with similar flag, moderator will check other posts of the users around the time, but I can flag all of them (originally i wasn't really sure whether it is worthy of moderators attention tbh)

@Sil Good work! It surely was worthy of flagging.

@amWhy Thanks, good to know :)

this low-quality post is short from reopened.

@Peter Dang. I've already downvoted. :(

Thanks Teresa and Peter on my C/D request! Now gone.

Thanks also for help on my pls close request!

@amWhy Does the link still contain the feminism aspect ? If yes, why is it ignored that links to such sources do not belong on this site ?

@Peter Which link?

In the almost reopened question above

@Peter, Yes, your linked post still contains the Link. Likely ought to be flagged.

Some user said he/she would flag it, perhaps it was declined ?

There was a heavy debate about the link, sadly most users did not see any problems with this link :(

D - actually I ran out of delete-votes. Happens very rarely.

@Peter Just need one more del vote now. I'm getting very low myself! Actually, I now have none left! It's all good, though!

@amWhy Can we see whether a post has been flagged by someone ?

@Peter I don't thinks so. If there is, I'm clueless what it is.

c - too vague

Close PSQ.

@KReiser Used my last close vote on the question you linked.

Regarding my last link, @Xander, I've also flagged a rude comment from the OP, for moderator attention

^^^^^OP deleted the question. The rude comment was handled. Thanks to the Mystery Mod! :)

Hello, @jasmine :)

Hi @amWhy

How are you doing, @jasmine?

I like the quotes in your profile. I've collected quotes, myself, over many years, so many I'd end up printing a huge volume of hundreds of pages of them!

Hi, @Jyrki !

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted user (71): What does the cardinal of these sequences converge to? $A_0$ is any set and $A_{n+1} = (x \in A_n, |x - a_n| \leq \sigma_n)$ by Pablo Menéndez on math.SE

Getting late in your neck of the words, @JyrkiLahtonen, no?

Good and what about you ? @amWhy okay. Ya I love quotes on mathematics and science. Sophie German question has been reopened

@jasmine Ahh. Your interests are very evident in the quotes you cite! :-)

okay ,thanks you @amWhy

Is there anything to be done when two reviewers make an egregiously wrong mistake? I don't see any way to flag or anything: math.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/1679995

Somewhat interestingly, the reviewers making the mistake have made many more reviews than the reviewer who made the right decision.

@rschwieb Yikes! I've been asking for the ability to flag mods from the suggested review queue, for reasons like this, and also wrt the quality of suggested edits.

@rschwieb The only reply of gotten from mods regarding "is there anything that can be done" is there suggest to flag the post edited for mod attention, in which one needs to point out the concern is a suggested edit on the post being flagged, while also being sure to include, in the field "for mod attention" the link to the suggested edit+summary. I am not happy with the need to have multiple tabs open to do so, but...

(sorry for the typos: meant "their" and not "there")