Sigh...

An old PSQ. It seems that this user posted a bunch of inequalities and claim to have tried some famous inequalities in a few lines in these questions without any concrete try at all.

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected, toxic body detected: Multiples in subsets of integers by user567182 on math.SE

@Did @DanielFischer @JyrkiLahtonen: Can any one of you help to delete this non-answer and this wrong answer? For the second one, I have more than explained here and here.

@amWhy @XanderHenderson: Open for deletion now.

This meta-questioner is really f'ing condescending.

"I don't know why I should have to define my terms! Everyone should know all of the terminology from related fields."

@user21820 I've done all that can for this answer.

@XanderHenderson I know that's why I was pinging you about a different one. =)

Lousy PSQ.

@XanderHenderson Part of the problem is that the community did not prevent PSQs from populating the site like rabbits, and so PSQ writers can point to an ample number of ancient questions that are worse than theirs...

@user21820 Indeed. It took time for standards to develop. On the other hand, I quite am sure that linked question will be gone in a couple of days.

@XanderHenderson Don't be so sure. There is often trouble with highly upvoted questions. For one, they need more votes to delete.

For deletion: 1, 2, 3,

4, 5

@Xander @Alex @amWhy @ZacharySelk: PSQs: A, B, C, D.

E, F, G, H

@user21820 Too bad I've used up today's votes…

@AlexFrancisco I hit the limit too sometimes. No hurry. =)

@user21820 Most need one more delete vote, though one is deleted, and two need more downvotes (after being closed), or a couple of days, prior to being open for deletion.

@amWhy Okay great!

@AlexFrancisco All five are now deleted. Thanks for posting them.

PSQs: this, that, and the other, and yet another.

@user21820, @XanderHenderson, @AlexFrancisco, @Did, @ZacharySelk, @all, including bored mods who like to hang out here :): see the four PSQ's listed above. Each needs to be closed, and then, ??.

@user21820 both are now deleted!

and STILL ANOTHER!

If I were up for some rep whoring, I could easily answer this question; dollars to donuts it ends up on the HNQ :\

@XanderHenderson I won't let it get to HNQ!!

@XanderHenderson Let me know if you think the "new and improved(?) title" isn't too awkward.

@XanderHenderson ... or not...

Oh, sorry. I was not here

It looks fine.

@amWhy (ping ping pong)

@Xander pingy-pongy pings!

Hey there, @robjohn!! I haven't run into you for awhile.

@amWhy I guess we're not traveling in the same circles these days.

@robjohn It's been a while since I've been at the mathematics chatroom, likely because I hadn't seen you there much for a span of time. Do you now check in there, here and there?

It's hard to keep on top of too many chatrooms, though!

@amWhy Yes. I am there when I can. I've been there today for a while, for example.

@robjohn I'm checking out the room now; and will do so more frequently. And please feel free to check in to CRUDE, as well. It's always good to have input from many perspectives.