12:25 PM
@user21820 indeed that's a priori not unlikely. Thus it was reasonable to ask for it to e checked. I did that and it turns out it isn't.
@user21820 they do not get that impression, because they were now informed that they should not do this and they also will note that it is noted when they do. Of course a second time we would be less generous in our interpretation of the facts.
@user21820 it's not clear to what extent it was dishonest. Indeed, different people have different perceptions and standards. As for me, there is also a difference between what I personally find good conduct and what I consider as useful to pursue and point out.
I try not to start a battle over every molehill. If this locally seems lax, so be it. I think globally it is the right approach.