Due to instructions from a math.se moderator, only profiles attacking a specific user are out of bounds. Go to it mods: math.stackexchange.com/users/1281/tim
And this profile is not the only behavior from this user, whose rants have often attacked specific users.
Note this user's vitriol expressed against two users, here, and with any semblance of research, a mod can see that the two behaviors I've linked to, repeat a pattern of behavior of this user and his harassment against specific users.
With no consequences faced by the user who has rspeatedly don the same on meta.math. You'd suspend me forthwith, on spot, if I were to have carried on like the user in the link I posted. Can we have some consistency to dole out consequences to all and anyone who publicly rants about any specific user/users.?
I've never done so on meta, or other very public places, mostly only in your chat, with a few exceptions in the mod office, and such. But you've done your share of ranting at me and about me in public chats, including privately. You've yet to suspend yourself.
That's a privilege a moderator has: they can violate the norms that they suspend users for not following, and virtually never suffer any consequences for the many times to to violate the COC and other norms. And they can look the other way about some users transgressions, while holding a magnifying glass to examine each and every comment of users they target.
Absolutely, but most of them only see the consequences dished out by mods who cannot justify, in a shroud of secrecy. "Action taken, there must be a reason?" boloney. And I don't reproduce much at all of your vitriol aimed at me for two years. And that's what I mean by hiding behind the title. Just like Donny T hides behind is office to desecrate all who object to even one little policy he supports. You've got power, and I think mods need more oversight from an external source other
other than the ole boys' club that has always been the math.se mod team.
