8:22 PM
@JyrkiLahtonen I think your last comment here was uncalled for, because it blames the voters who voted to delete the post did so because Jack edited the post. That's absurd, had nothing to do with it. At least for me it did not. To suggest otherwise is pretty darn biased.
In any case, @Jyrki, you've made your viewpoint clear, and contributed, yet again, to the attack of users wanting very badly to maintain, let alone increase, the quality on this site. You were successfully manipulated by folks who want to banish any expectations of askers, and want to open the flood gates to a site I know you do not want to be a part of.
8:45 PM
@amWhy Noted. I have been largely on your side in the disagreements with Jack. The site is in dire need of measures like what you have been doing. But, this question was mostly harmless. Not a great question by any stretch of imagination. I was hoping to convey to the OP that this is their one and only chance to improve the question. I honestly think that the deletion came a bit too soon, and that is my main concern here.
@JyrkiLahtonen 1. What rep is necessary before being able to post images? 2. Sorry Jyrki but questions based on offsite material are (and always have been) a big no-no in the SE ecosystem. Disappointing to see a mod actively disobeying the principle. 3. I wish you would abstain from routinely voicing wild interpretations about the (necessarily irrational) motivations of closevoters. Maybe the users who voted to close this question did so simply because, after a rational examination, they thought ...
9:06 PM
« first day (1134 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (2243 days later) »