« first day (3332 days earlier)      last day (45 days later) » 

12:49 PM
Paramanand Singh tells me that "I think you are misinterpreting my comment. If you have to challenge any action of a moderator then you don't have to report it to any of the mods, but rather use 'contact' form which is handled by SE employees and not by any mod." That is a sham. The community managers' purpose is to protect the company from legal, political, or commercial liabilities, not to correct abuses by moderators.
Paramanand Singh also says a rule against discussion of past suspensions is about respect. But it is about preventing abusive and dishonest behavior by moderators from being seen in public.
 
1:21 PM
Paramanad Singh wrote: "There is another problem which I can see with this post. It discusses about your past suspensions and again users (including mods) are not supposed to discuss suspensions of individual users in public on meta site." That is not about respect; that is about a regime of lèse-majesté for the moderators. A sort of compulsory and false show of public respect for the moderators regardless of what they do.
Is there anyone among the moderators who values my genuine respect that would consist of putting my confidence in their competence and their honesty?
 

« first day (3332 days earlier)      last day (45 days later) »