« first day (1786 days earlier)      last day (1596 days later) » 

12:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-11T00:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
2 hours later…
2:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-11T02:00:00.001Z and @Duga is alive
ML Classification 0.0020760617778642445 (Old classification 0.43)
@user4581301 The crux of the matter here is: how do YOU manage to write code that isn't based on sequentially consistent operations and STILL be able to have CONFIDENCE on your algorithms. It may look like a poll but it isn't, I'm looking for practical guidelines that programmers can use w/o being abstraction experts; who the hell is capable of writing whole programs (non trivial ones) under the thread formalism (happen-before, modification order, value seen...) presented in the C++ std? — curiousguy 36 secs ago
 
2:24 AM
ML Classification 0.30949769988852077 (Old classification 0.0)
 
2:43 AM
ML Classification 0.015605139974646586 (Old classification 0.0)
Welcome to StackOverflow! We are NOT a free homework service, and your 'question' doesn't show any attempt whatsoever. Please review this letter and update your question to at least showcase an attempt in a minimal, complete, and verifiable example. For further information, please see how to ask good questions, and take the tour of the siteObsidian Age 29 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
4:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-11T04:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
4:20 AM
Edits fetched for 233811: 2. quota remaining 9168
 
4:35 AM
Edits fetched for 233814: 5. quota remaining 9149
 
 
1 hour later…
6:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-11T06:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
6:10 AM
ML Classification 0.5485349815782388 (Old classification 0.0)
See this post for why this question is difficult to answer as it stands: softwareengineering.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6166/…yshavit 59 secs ago
 
6:22 AM
ML Classification 0.01908872389745911 (Old classification 0.4)
Something internal to jQuery-UI is setting c to null when it should be an array or string. Only the jQuery programmers could tell what's going on. But they won't bother with such an old browser. — Barmar 24 secs ago
 
 
2 hours later…
8:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-11T08:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
Edits fetched for 233770: 2. quota remaining 8902
Edits fetched for 233770: 2. quota remaining 8893
 
8:40 AM
Edits fetched for 233770: 4. quota remaining 8851
 
9:25 AM
Edits fetched for 233844: 2. quota remaining 8797
 
10:00 AM
The time is 2019-12-11T10:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
10:23 AM
ML Classification 6.341803088383936E-4 (Old classification 0.45000002)
Wow 7 lines of code to get the current cell value and it returns NULL. Any idea who designed this poor excuse for a grid. I guess all the good programmers that Microsoft used to have went to Google or AWS. — Paul McCarthy 20 secs ago
 
11:09 AM
ML Classification 0.1791563521922911 (Old classification 0.0)
@Rosme I think it’s the right place here: this is really a practical issue about writing c++ code and not really a software engineering question — Christophe 1 min ago
 
12:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-11T12:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
1 hour later…
1:20 PM
ML Classification 0.28348925536657665 (Old classification 0.0)
ML Classification 0.16123561259021954 (Old classification 0.65)
This question is off-topic for SO. This site is for specific questions related to programming (code) or use of programmers tools. You can find more information about this site by taking the tour and reading the help center pages. — Ken White 38 secs ago
Edits fetched for 232155: 3. quota remaining 8508
 
1:46 PM
ML Classification 0.0036955882720763793 (Old classification 0.4)
That's a liability of depending on MinGW, they did not manage to reverse-engineer it (yet). These open source projects progress by taking contributions from programmers that have a need to fill, you're it right now. Good luck. — Hans Passant 24 secs ago
 
2:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-11T14:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
2:56 PM
ML Classification 0.01584114975183282 (Old classification 0.42)
@kaya3 this question is a poor fit over there for the same reasons as here. Please abstain of recommending sites you're not familiar with. See What goes on Software Engineering (previously known as Programmers)? A guide for Stack Overflowgnat 40 secs ago
 
3:06 PM
ML Classification 0.5094813108630959 (Old classification 0.0)
This question is probably better asked on the Software Engineering community site. At a glance it sounds like the right solution is to have a separate React frontend that comsumes a PHP backend API. — nevada_scout 1 min ago
 
3:48 PM
ML Classification 0.0014502038721759141 (Old classification 0.4)
There are multiple reasons, hard to be sure when you don't show the exception's stack trace. The Bitmap class is the one class where .NET programmers have to stop pretending that calling Dispose() is not necessary. So you must call Dispose() on the previous PictureBox.Image. But I'll put a buck on FileSystemWatcher, it works too well. You can't load an image from a file while the app that creates it is still busy writing to the file. Yes, the exception you get for that is often very confuzzling. — Hans Passant 13 secs ago
ML Classification 0.1364035052814443 (Old classification 0.0)
@gnat Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are already similar questions on SE.SE with answers which should answer this question too - for example, softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/178317/…kaya3 55 secs ago
The time is 2019-12-11T16:00:00.008Z and @Duga is alive
 
4:52 PM
2019-12-11T16:52:00.450Z Quota has been reset. Was 8259 is now 9999
ML Classification 0.19244510494043515 (Old classification 0.4)
Ah. A classic trap for new c programmers. — dmckee 59 secs ago
 
5:07 PM
ML Classification 0.670600138007152 (Old classification 0.0)
Welcome to StackOverflow! But this is not the right place to ask this question. Rather post it on softwareengineering.stackexchange.comvendettamit 54 secs ago
 
5:26 PM
ML Classification 0.007081970237471999 (Old classification 0.4)
It's good that you're considering names with "non-Latin" characters, be careful that there are a lot of other incorrect assumptions you may be making about people's names: kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/…Jordan Running 54 secs ago
You might try Software Recommendations, but (as you should before posting at any site) I'd suggest you review their guidelines (available in their help center) before posting. — Ken White 45 secs ago
ML Classification 0.013179648249600894 (Old classification 0.5)
This question is off-topic because a) it's entirely opinion-based, which is not appropriate here; and b) it's not a specific question related to programming (code) or use of a programmers tool (IDE, compiler, etc.). Your experiences here will be much better if you spend some time taking the tour and reading the help center pages, especially What topics can I ask about here? and What types of question should I avoid asking?. — Ken White 17 secs ago
ML Classification 0.24965609715767745 (Old classification 0.70000005)
Well, I did not know that. I really hoped to get some wise advice about the topic. I did not know a better place than a platform full of experienced programmers. Thanks anyway! — Ishaan007 23 secs ago
The time is 2019-12-11T18:00:00.008Z and @Duga is alive
 
6:17 PM
ML Classification 6.431321341475629E-5 (Old classification 0.4)
The Origin is where something starts. Array indexes start at 0 and are valid up to the size of the array minus 1. That's [0,N) in interval notation. When you try to use arrays based on an origin of 1 you need to translate from 1-based indexes to 0-based indexes and introduce an unnecessary potential point of failure. Even if you do it right, you waste time testing that you got it right AND explaining to other programmers why you did it and proving to them that you got it right. — user4581301 5 secs ago
 
 
2 hours later…
7:56 PM
ML Classification 0.007460454433171817 (Old classification 0.0)
Hello, Thanks for the quick reply. I haven't built the UWP Viewer yet. I wanted to know whether it works before start building the App. If not I want to whether there are any rules to follow when building a dll for UWP. ( I'm new to software engineering, have an electrical engineering background, So pardon me, if my questions don't make any sense. ) — Gayashan Rathnavibushana just now
The time is 2019-12-11T20:00:00Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
1 hour later…
9:18 PM
ML Classification 0.018301273844186568 (Old classification 0.0)
Welcome to Stack Overflow. Please read Open Letter to Students with Homework Problems. We're not here to provide tutorials. It's also a good idea to take the tour, read about what's on-topic in the help center, and How to Ask. — Chris 1 min ago
ML Classification 0.0011826277058709666 (Old classification 0.45000002)
@Barmar: Stack Overflow is not a site “to ask questions about specific code that you've written.” That is a subset of what questions can be asked. The Help Center says that, generally, questions about specific programming problems, software algorithms, software tools commonly used by programmers, and practical, answerable problems unique to software development are appropriate. Certainly questions about algorithm design are within those general areas, although it is better if they are somewhat more specific than this one. — Eric Postpischil 20 secs ago
Recommendations are off-topic for StackOverlow. Peruse Software Recommendations before posting there. — Thomas Matthews 11 secs ago
 
10:00 PM
The time is 2019-12-11T22:00:00.008Z and @Duga is alive
 
 
1 hour later…
11:27 PM
ML Classification 7.97850271199255E-5 (Old classification 0.4)
Catching runtime exception is not always a bad practice, this should be done with care on specific exceptions. Most of the most used frameworks (e.g. Camel, Spring, and so on) does that and programmers continue to use them without thinking if it's a good practice or not. Catching the Throwable or the root Exception is definitively not a good practice but I have some cases where the 3rd party throws that kind of exception and I have no choice than catching the class Exception in my code. Look at this answer. — рüффп 16 secs ago
 
11:39 PM
ML Classification 0.4521815872795923 (Old classification 0.0)
@Enigmativity more info on it is now here: softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/402381/…WDUK 1 min ago
Mathieu Guindon vs. Simon Forsberg: 17262 diff. Year: +1242. Quarter: +509. Month: +129. Week: +99. Day: +20.
 

« first day (1786 days earlier)      last day (1596 days later) »