I followed these steps: Install linuxbrew from github. Ensure wget is installed via linuxbrew. Install hadoop via linuxbrew. My hadoop configuration files were in a different location than the tutorial I was following suggested. Also, it appears to be a pretty bad tutorial,because it uses sudo to edit ~/.profile and misspells profile as profil, but I sorted that part out.
When I tried to run the included startup scripts, they weren't in my $PATH, so I added them.
@Seth signing the non-disclosure form, and took the day to do the interview next week. can't tell you anything after that, but it should be interesting - the other question should I spend the 40 pounds towards the mx5 pro to flash to ubuntu ;)
@Windows3.1 because some might forget a name that begins with J if your name now begins with W and then changes quickly to something else
The setuid permission bit tells Linux to run a program with the effective user id of the owner instead of the executor:
> cat setuid-test.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
printf("%d", geteuid());
return 0;
}
> gcc -o setuid-test setuid-test.c
>...
@edwinksl nah , it's a script for the "single click expo" question. It sort of works, but . . . i cannot disable single window click minimization. As for that linked question , it could be done, but it's very if not impossible to completely emulate what OP wants in shell. They'd need a C app with ncurses
I've often come across posts on forums or other websites where you see people joking in such a manner about running/logging in as root as if it's something awful and everyone ought to know about it. However, there isn't much that a search reveals on the matter.
It may be widely known to Linux e...
The abstract question is:
If script x calls program y, do I need a NOPASSWD entry in /etc/sudoers for x, y or both x & y? (And can x then call sudo -v without a password?)
Details:
I'm trying to figure out what should go into the /etc/sudoers file to allow a user on Ubuntu (i.e., user ID 1000 ...
I was stumbling around and happened onto this essay by Bruce Schneier claiming that the XKCD password scheme was effectively dead.
Modern password crackers combine different words from their dictionaries: [...]
This is why the oft-cited XKCD scheme for generating passwords -- string toge...
@KazWolfe I bet I could make a good password this way: turn on a Persian keyboard and type normal words in English. The English equivalent would be like "sdfhiueaghvhfsdhajldskhgiuas"
The setuid permission bit tells Linux to run a program with the effective user id of the owner instead of the executor:
> cat setuid-test.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
printf("%d", geteuid());
return 0;
}
> gcc -o setuid-test setuid-test.c
>...
The abstract question is:
If script x calls program y, do I need a NOPASSWD entry in /etc/sudoers for x, y or both x & y? (And can x then call sudo -v without a password?)
Details:
I'm trying to figure out what should go into the /etc/sudoers file to allow a user on Ubuntu (i.e., user ID 1000 ...
I was stumbling around and happened onto this essay by Bruce Schneier claiming that the XKCD password scheme was effectively dead.
Modern password crackers combine different words from their dictionaries: [...]
This is why the oft-cited XKCD scheme for generating passwords -- string toge...
