« first day (977 days earlier)      last day (1410 days later) » 

12:06 PM
@Martin Sleziak Why you did not ask me about these things? Why are you doing this behind my back? I think it's not fair. — Michael Rozenberg 1 hour ago
@MichaelRozenberg I do not think that what you are saying is accurate. The whole discussion started by the tags (a.m.-g.m.-inequality) created by Harsh Kumar, and (young-inequality) created by Leila. (I believe I notified Harsh Kumar about my post in tag management thread. So the tag creator was aware of this.) The post was publicly visible here on meta, and it appeared even in community bulletin. Anyway, if needed, we can discuss this in chat. — Martin Sleziak 2 mins ago
Michael, if you wish we can discuss in chat whether I did something unfair or not. However, today I'll be travelling for the rest of the day - I am not sure I'll have access to internet. Starting tomorrow I should be online quite a lot.
 
12:23 PM
@MartinSleziak OK!
 
 
2 hours later…
2:20 PM
@MartinSleziak: Did you know what that user just did in the CRUDE room? He kept repeating chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/39275008#39275008. First time I trashed it. Second time I flagged it as spam and it was deleted. Third time I flagged again and a moderator deleted the lot. There is no point in engaging the user any further, in my opinion.
 
Maybe later today I will be online again. Tomorrow I should have my usual access to internet.
@MichaelRozenberg It seems that I have wifi connection in the train. So if it works ok, I should be online for the next two hours.
Anyway, I am not sure whether there is too much to discuss there. The discussion about inequality-related tags started by a tag created by Harsh Kumar (about AM-GM-inequality). I think I notified him.
The second tag mentioned in the post was (young-inequality) created by Leila. I am not sure whether I pinged her - in fact I think she might already been suspended by the time the discussion started.
It is true that some tags created by you were mentioned later - in the addition to the post. But when the discussion started, no tags you have created were mentioned there.
So I am sorry you feel that I made that meta post behind your back - it was definitely not my intention.
I believe this relatively recent addition was the first time when some tags created by you were mentioned. (Correct me if I am wrong.)
> EDIT: Recently (end of July 2017) two new inequality-related tags were created, namely and . The list of questions currently having these tags can be found here.
@user21820 Personally I think that the question about MSE university could be left open. (Although I would welcome a different more polite wording.)
Of course, I mostly expect answer explaining why it is not a workable idea.
 
2:43 PM
I meant to write answers, not answer - sorry for the typo.
 
3:23 PM
It seems that we have a bit more drama in chat and on meta these days. (Not so long ago, drama was much more prominent on meta.MO than on this site.)
 
@MartinSleziak I don't have a preference whether it's left open or not, which is why I didn't vote to delete it. However, given the observed behaviour it is definitely justifiable to close and delete. Seriously, though, what just happened was just strange.
 
I definitely do not defend the OP's behavior.
All I am saying that I can imagine a reasonable question along the lines of: How can we create a free university within MSE?
 
3:52 PM
@MartinSleziak For me all this all correct, but in my opinion we can not delete bags, which I created. If I created some bag I think before and I think that all these bags are very useful for the forum. Thank you for your understanding.
 
Do you mean tags (rather than bags)?
 
@MartinSleziak Yes indeed. It would be a nice idea if it had been properly raised.
(Despite being unsuitable for Math SE, of course. Niceness is orthogonal to fit.)
(Well, not quite orthogonal I guess! =P)
 
@MichaelRozenberg I am definitely not claiming that you created those tag with bad intentions. However, it is good to know whether other users consider thos tag useful, too.
However, it seems that so far there wasn't very big opposition against the new tags.
in Tagging, Jun 1 at 11:40, by Martin Sleziak
Not too long ago the tag has been created. Then discussion on meta led to removal of the tag. But since the tag-creator already added the tag to many questions, more than 70 questions were bumped twice. (Once when the tag was added, once when it was removed.) See also here: http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/3740/2017/1/4
I guess we do not want to repeat the situation I mentioned in the previous message - that's why it is good to discuss the tags before they grow too big. (Since the removal is more difficult then.)
 

« first day (977 days earlier)      last day (1410 days later) »