You know when you rely on a tool, but the tool does not work exactly how you think it works...

TIL that you can't rely on the task manager to figure out if your app is going to run out of memory...

@Jimmy i agree and that was partially my dilemma, since the code that examined my state transitions was only triggered by user actions it seemed unnatural for there to be a state that could start and finish without any user action

I am a bit confused in my attempt to implement the Command pattern into a card game I am writing

If i am spawning IActions, that have their functionality embedded, how do i then verify the action?

verify that the action is correct

@AlexandreVaillancourt I suspect I've never quite understood how virtual memory works

There's this weird venn diagram of private bytes, reserved memory, working set etc.

where can I get tutorials for convex decomposition. All the things I see are just peoples code.

@Tyyppi_77 because I am trying to create my own implementation not copy someones code.

@TheMaskedRebel use someone else's code and create a tutorial about it :p

@Jimmy yeah, I guess it something like "if it's not broken, don't look into it"... I never had to look into this before last week, where I was not able to request 364 bytes..

I'm still not clear on all of this either...

Hi Alexandre and Almo! Long time no see :P

When implementing the icommand and state patterns, where should command verification take place? For example, if I am programming a card game that translates typed commands into program commands, I want to be verify that the actual command is allowed based on game/state rules, but I am not sure how to handle that verification. If i put it in the command, I need to know state implementation details, and if I put it in the state, I need to know command execution details.

no you split it

Personally, I'd have a verification thing just after player input

no invalid commands should hit the network

but that does not mean the network should trust all input

@cubesnyc you can also put an additional class that knows the command and the state and that bridges the two software parts.

@Pip hi! How are you?

I'm good! Just popping in to see how y'all are doing

Got nostalgic

is 2D ACD(approximate convex decomposition) the same as 3D ACD. The only diffference I see is changing the 2d vectors to 3d vectors. Here is some code

o/

(Hello)

@AlexandreVaillancourt I thought of that but then i realized that the only real way to validate a command would be to know the implementation details of the command

and every command has different implementation details

in a card game example, i shouldnt be able to raise to X amount if X is less than my balance or the current state of the minimum amount in the pot

yea i thought of that, but then i would have to know what state im in?

perhaps my state interface is not well defined enough

@Tyyppi_77 are there any algorithms for ACD(approximate convex decomposition).

Who do you guys think would win: Thanos vs. Super Sonic

@FreezePhoenix thanos

@TheMaskedRebel um... where is your profile picture on the user list?

Or are you using an FKEY?

FKEY,

@TheMaskedRebel Interesting opinion. Will write down.

Here is the keil algorithm